• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

1.6 vs 1.7 rockers

  • Thread starter Thread starter coupecop
  • Start date Start date May 24, 2007
C

coupecop

New Member
Aug 9, 2006
166
0
0
mission texas
May 24, 2007
#1
  • May 24, 2007
  • #1
I just have a question way will be the deference betwen the 1.6 and 1.7 rocker in power how much more power one from the other
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
May 24, 2007
#2
  • May 24, 2007
  • #2
Why cause potential valve train strain with a higher ratio rocker when you can get the same effect from the right cam?

Stick with 1.6s and get a higher lift cam.


What will the power difference be? I don't recall how .1 lift equates to exactly how much more lift, but compare it to basically just having a bit more lift on your cam, and that's how much more you'll make. Basically unless you get 1.7s super super cheap and can't afford a new cam, IMO they're a waste of time. UNLESS you're really old school and just doing a super low dollar build, and then you can get 1.7 stamped steel rockers off of a 460 and get a little more out of a stock cam.
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
May 25, 2007
#3
  • May 25, 2007
  • #3
1.7's AND a cam can likely result in piston/valve clearance issues.

stick with the 1.6's as mentioned that way you can run a proper cam. wish to hell I would have done my homework b4 bolting on my 1.7's.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
May 25, 2007
#4
  • May 25, 2007
  • #4
Supposidly within a couple HP of each other. Not worth the risk of breakage or hitting your piston, just get a more aggressive cam.
Kevin
 
S

smallstang393

Member
Oct 18, 2004
75
0
6
May 25, 2007
#5
  • May 25, 2007
  • #5
If you take your total valve lift and divide it buy 1.6 then take your total and multiply it buy 1.7 and get your new lift with 1.7's

Example .498/1.6=311.25 then 311.25 x 1.7=529.125
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
May 25, 2007
#6
  • May 25, 2007
  • #6
i got a good deal on a B-cam for cheap. it has low lift, .480 with 1.6s

the b-cam has pretty nice duration for a street mustang, 224* @.050 on both sides

i traded some 1.6s i had for some 1.7s, now the lift on the b- cam is around .510 - .512, helps it out a little bit.
 

ronburgundy

Member
Nov 19, 2006
179
0
16
BC coast
May 25, 2007
#7
  • May 25, 2007
  • #7
it all depends on your cam grind and your flow chart for your heads. some heads flow no better at 550 lift than at 500. stick with what your cam grinder/manufacturer recommends.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
May 25, 2007
#8
  • May 25, 2007
  • #8
Foxfan88 said:
i got a good deal on a B-cam for cheap. it has low lift, .480 with 1.6s

the b-cam has pretty nice duration for a street mustang, 224* @.050 on both sides

i traded some 1.6s i had for some 1.7s, now the lift on the b- cam is around .510 - .512, helps it out a little bit.
Click to expand...


See, as far as lift goes, that brings you right on par with an F303.
 
C

coupecop

New Member
Aug 9, 2006
166
0
0
mission texas
May 25, 2007
#9
  • May 25, 2007
  • #9
Do you think it would me a good gain if I put the 1.7 rokers on with the heads and cam that I have . I have the cast iron gt 40 and a e 303.
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
May 26, 2007
#10
  • May 26, 2007
  • #10
I agree with ya'll !! IF you have the 1.7 rockers and a small lift cam, and want to raise the lift on your cam... then install the 1.7. IF you are GOING to buy the 1.7's cause "everyone uses them", then I say NO!! Cost is an issue... 250-325 for a set of 1.7s and gain 10 HP on the cam, vs 200.00 for a Camshaft that will give 35-40 HP!! See where I am going... dont Bandied the valve train!! On the tests run in a few mags.. the HP increase wa less than 10 HP!!!

Just me........................................

Thumper
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
713
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
614
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jun 19, 2026
spencergt66
S
Custom tune?
  • Nostang25
  • Jul 13, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
592
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 17, 2025
FastDriver
A
90 Fox Manuel steering
  • adimice
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
101
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 2, 2026
Bullitt347
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
242
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?