• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

14.45@102

  • Thread starter Thread starter MadHandle8169
  • Start date Start date May 13, 2005
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
May 13, 2005
#1
  • May 13, 2005
  • #1
Now to start it off I ran this with the mods in my sig however it was on a G-Tech. I know these are not terrible accurate however, I bought mostly as a comparison. Well I only ran it like 3 time before the intake and the best I got was a 14.5@98. After my intake install I ran it again on the same road and got a 14.45@102. That is a 4MPH increase with the intake which makes me go like this.

My times suck because I can't launch the thing just says "GO" so I know I can get the actual seconds down and I'm happy with the MPH.

I'm hoping for Low 14s @100 when I finally make it to the track. Because I know the MPH is higher for the G-Tech.

 

slo65

New Member
May 26, 2003
448
0
0
Southern California
May 13, 2005
#2
  • May 13, 2005
  • #2
from what i hear the mph is off on those, and that mph seems really high for that e.t.
 
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
May 13, 2005
#3
  • May 13, 2005
  • #3
My E.T. sucks because it just says GO. The MPH is usually a couple MPH higher and they explain why because at tracks they take and average or something and the G-Tech takes the actual speed you cross the line. They are pretty accurate if you do it on a flat road and set it right. I'm more happy because I went up 4MPH with the intake swap.
 

slo65

New Member
May 26, 2003
448
0
0
Southern California
May 13, 2005
#4
  • May 13, 2005
  • #4
yea i'm gonna do the mass air conversion (my car's a speed density) then do my upper/lower, hopefully i'll feel the same gain u did, could u tell the difference?
 
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
May 13, 2005
#5
  • May 13, 2005
  • #5
Yeah I can definitely tell the difference. That's also why I got the G-Tech. Even though it isn't terribly accurate I atleast have something to compare my car with the intake and without it. Even if the numbers aren't what I will run I know that the intake definitely made my car faster.
 
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
May 13, 2005
#6
  • May 13, 2005
  • #6
iono 4mph from an intake, iono about that, but id say the butt dyno can be accurate at feeling the gains enough
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
May 13, 2005
#7
  • May 13, 2005
  • #7
igotyofire said:
iono 4mph from an intake, iono about that, but id say the butt dyno can be accurate at feeling the gains enough
Click to expand...

I went from 14.8 @ 95.27mph to a 14.17 @ 98.99 with my intake and tb. It's not to unlikely. Those Gtech meters usually read about 2mph faster than a track trap speed.
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
May 13, 2005
#8
  • May 13, 2005
  • #8
Yeah, 102 mph at 14.5 is bogus.
 
B

bdub02

New Member
May 2, 2005
13
0
0
Evansville/Logansport Indiana
May 13, 2005
#9
  • May 13, 2005
  • #9
just a little FYI it says go, but it just means its ready for you to go. you can take the time to 'launch' the car if you wish. just dont roll forward or you will have to reset the G Tech.

just thought i would let ya know
 
M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member
May 5, 2002
432
0
0
Brick, NJ
May 13, 2005
#10
  • May 13, 2005
  • #10
LOL thanks I wasn't sure if you had to go when it said "GO". I don't care that about my E.T. I am just happy my MPH increased by 4 after the swap.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
Help with 1986 GT 5 Speed Please
  • Lcasada1999
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
184
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 21, 2026
General karthief
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
474
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
288
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
H
Brand New Built 302 overheating
  • hassler
  • Sep 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
Rcdgl
R
J
Emission problems
  • jls.zmmr
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
213
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?