• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

185 AFR heads on 302

  • Thread starter Thread starter stang302v8
  • Start date Start date Sep 25, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Sep 28, 2005
#21
  • Sep 28, 2005
  • #21
Yes you will have to notch the pistons to clear the large valve.
 
X

xarnyz

New Member
Sep 8, 2005
19
0
0
Sep 28, 2005
#22
  • Sep 28, 2005
  • #22
Thanks man
Whoever told me these 302's were way easier to work on than the gsx I had was lying.
 

Lyncher

New Member
Jun 14, 2005
434
0
0
Sep 28, 2005
#23
  • Sep 28, 2005
  • #23
^^^ Try working on an ls1...
 
I

ifucan

Founding Member
Mar 27, 2002
85
0
0
central jersey
Sep 28, 2005
#24
  • Sep 28, 2005
  • #24
ive done this...i used 1.6 rr and a stock cam...let me be emphatic...NO BOTTOM END, car would pull like crazy from 3500 up but didn't have any guts down low=bad short times, i can best equate it to a two stroke dirtbike...obviously like rick said, it ain't worth it w/o the supporting hardware...reason i did it was because i bought them for a 351w and just wanted to 'play' w/them on the smaller displacement engine till i got my new bullet done...in the end tho, i took them off for some p heads and im much happier...p heads have tq all over the afr's and still pull respectable up top(because they are a better match for my combo)...good luck...o and no flycutting here
 
X

xarnyz

New Member
Sep 8, 2005
19
0
0
Sep 28, 2005
#25
  • Sep 28, 2005
  • #25
ifucan said:
ive done this...i used 1.6 rr and a stock cam...let me be emphatic...NO BOTTOM END, car would pull like crazy from 3500 up but didn't have any guts down low=bad short times, i can best equate it to a two stroke dirtbike...obviously like rick said, it ain't worth it w/o the supporting hardware...reason i did it was because i bought them for a 351w and just wanted to 'play' w/them on the smaller displacement engine till i got my new bullet done...in the end tho, i took them off for some p heads and im much happier...p heads have tq all over the afr's and still pull respectable up top(because they are a better match for my combo)...good luck...o and no flycutting here
Click to expand...

Sorry, but what's flycutting? Anyhow, you did this without re-notching your pistons? Were they stock pistons?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Sep 28, 2005
#26
  • Sep 28, 2005
  • #26
He used a stock cam, if he would have floated the valves it would have hit on the outside edges of the eyebrows/valve reliefs.

Personally a stock cam has no place with a head like that, you are wasting a ton of power. I understand why he did it since he was building something else.

Flycutting is notching
 

lickem

New Member
Sep 11, 2005
62
0
0
lake elsinore ca
Sep 28, 2005
#27
  • Sep 28, 2005
  • #27
ive got a stock 91 lx with a 302 and got a good deal on some 1.7 roller rockers and thought about putting them on to get alittle more fun out of it, am i going to have clearance problems by installing them? im not sure if i have the dish hyper's or the flat tops.

also a question on the afr 185's and 165's what is everyones thoughts on a supercharger application, still go with the 165's?

thanks
 
I

ifucan

Founding Member
Mar 27, 2002
85
0
0
central jersey
Sep 28, 2005
#28
  • Sep 28, 2005
  • #28
stock 120k shortblock no flycutting
 

ImportEater98

New Member
Mar 17, 2003
708
0
0
Worcester, MA
Oct 5, 2005
#29
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #29
To cut or not to cut.....thats my question!

I'm still unclear on this, so forgive me if this has been answered...but...I am building up a 306. It has Keith Black Flat Top hypers in it. I would like to run an AFR 185. I know from previous searching that the 2.02 valve will infact hit a stock piston...do these aftermarket slugs have more of a relief in them to accomidate the bigger valve? I really don't want to flycut these pistons...i think it makes them weaker...they are as thick as they are for a reason IMO.
I would like to run the Comp Cams XE282HR cam 565/574 lift, 232/240 @0.50"
The AFR sight claims with 10.1:1 (I have about 9.6) this combo is capable of 455 fwhp......please steer me in the right direction!
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Oct 5, 2005
#30
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #30
A good aftermarket slug will have a deeper relief. Try calling kieth black and asking them. If you have the clearance, thats a great head for your 306.
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Oct 5, 2005
#31
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #31
The best bet for large valves (with the exception of the TFS heads) such as 2.02" and greater is that it is best to install heads of this nature during a rebuild. No point in spending the money at a machine shop to flycut the factory pistons when you will be having to buy new pistons (possibly again) for a rebuild anyway. The valve reliefs on the stock pistons simply are not large enough. We are talking about going from a stock 1.78" intake valve to a 2.02" valve size - don't see a problem? Only other ways around it are makeing sure the came is very carefully selected or lowering compression by increasing PTV clearances.

As with the AFR 165 vs. 185 heads, for smaller engines and/or low-revving engines the 165's are better because they have a better port velocity than their bigger cousin. As always with engines, things must be matched well for things to work well and port velocity must match power and RPM demands and needs or else the combination doesn't end up working its best.
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Oct 5, 2005
#32
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #32
To state it clearly, when I clayed my GT40s with my TRW forged flat tops (L2482F)with valve reliefs, the closest approach was at the edge of the valve, much closer than I expected. I had plenty of vertical clearance. This was with the 1.84 intakes, etc.

Just install a head and check it to be sure.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 5, 2005
#33
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #33
Depends on what kind of piston you have whether it will have a deeper relief or not. No matter if it is good or bad. Quality or not.

ImportEater - Don't expect 455fwhp with accessories and tranny attached
 

Hissing Cobra

Founding Member
Jan 4, 2002
798
0
17
Massachusetts
Oct 5, 2005
#34
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • #34
ImportEater98 said:
I'm still unclear on this, so forgive me if this has been answered...but...I am building up a 306. It has Keith Black Flat Top hypers in it. I would like to run an AFR 185. I know from previous searching that the 2.02 valve will infact hit a stock piston...do these aftermarket slugs have more of a relief in them to accomidate the bigger valve? I really don't want to flycut these pistons...i think it makes them weaker...they are as thick as they are for a reason IMO.
I would like to run the Comp Cams XE282HR cam 565/574 lift, 232/240 @0.50"
The AFR sight claims with 10.1:1 (I have about 9.6) this combo is capable of 455 fwhp......please steer me in the right direction!
Click to expand...

John, I got your e-mail and for some reason, I can't send outgoing mail. Therefore, I'll reply here.

Your combo sounds almost exactly like mine. As you know, I too, have a 306 with the Keith Black hyperutectic pistons. Their notches must be deep enough because I have the AFR 185's (58 cc's) and they fit without a problem. Also, my block was decked to create 10:8:1 compression. Definitely check with my brother (Retro 5.0 or Rick91GT) as they know their stuff about measurements.

As for the cam, I'm not too sure how big you can go. I've got an Elgin Pro Stock cam in mine (248 INT/258 EXH @ .50, .536 INT/.560 EXH) and it runs great on the street and on the track (12.42 @ 109) on 93 octane.

I do not believe that you'll get 455 flywheel horsepower but I could be wrong. Mine made 307 at the wheels, which would be somewhere in the 360-370 flywheel horsepower range. Of course, I may also be costing myself some horsepower because of my twin four barrel setup.

Good luck!
 
T

Topdowncruise

New Member
Apr 7, 2005
207
0
0
Canada
Oct 6, 2005
#35
  • Oct 6, 2005
  • #35
lickem said:
ive got a stock 91 lx with a 302 and got a good deal on some 1.7 roller rockers and thought about putting them on to get alittle more fun out of it, am i going to have clearance problems by installing them? im not sure if i have the dish hyper's or the flat tops.

also a question on the afr 185's and 165's what is everyones thoughts on a supercharger application, still go with the 165's?

thanks
Click to expand...
No clearance problems with my setup with the stock cam.
 

ImportEater98

New Member
Mar 17, 2003
708
0
0
Worcester, MA
Oct 6, 2005
#36
  • Oct 6, 2005
  • #36
Hissing Cobra said:
John, I got your e-mail and for some reason, I can't send outgoing mail. Therefore, I'll reply here.

Your combo sounds almost exactly like mine. As you know, I too, have a 306 with the Keith Black hyperutectic pistons. Their notches must be deep enough because I have the AFR 185's (58 cc's) and they fit without a problem. Also, my block was decked to create 10:8:1 compression. Definitely check with my brother (Retro 5.0 or Rick91GT) as they know their stuff about measurements.

As for the cam, I'm not too sure how big you can go. I've got an Elgin Pro Stock cam in mine (248 INT/258 EXH @ .50, .536 INT/.560 EXH) and it runs great on the street and on the track (12.42 @ 109) on 93 octane.

I do not believe that you'll get 455 flywheel horsepower but I could be wrong. Mine made 307 at the wheels, which would be somewhere in the 360-370 flywheel horsepower range. Of course, I may also be costing myself some horsepower because of my twin four barrel setup.

Good luck!
Click to expand...

Thanks for the comforting info Pete...this takes a lot of my guesswork out!
Take Care!
John
 

aleborjas

New Member
Sep 11, 2005
610
0
0
Oct 6, 2005
#37
  • Oct 6, 2005
  • #37
i have a 306 and i am buying a pair of 185's with RPMII intake its little big but im planing on a stroker in future!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
893
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
930
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Engine 302 production block selection
  • FastDriver
  • May 19, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2025
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?