• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

1965 289 / 4spd

  • Thread starter Thread starter oldcarguy
  • Start date Start date Jul 12, 2009

oldcarguy

New Member
Jul 6, 2009
3
0
0
Jul 12, 2009
#1
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #1
Went to get a new clutch & pressure plate, prior to removal, and they listed a 10", a 10.5" & 11".
NAPA guy said it appeared the 10" was most common ( more sales) so, which one would be correct ?
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jul 12, 2009
#2
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #2
oldcarguy said:
Went to get a new clutch & pressure plate, prior to removal, and they listed a 10", a 10.5" & 11".
NAPA guy said it appeared the 10" was most common ( more sales) so, which one would be correct ?
Click to expand...

The 260, 289 2V, and 289 4V had the 10", and the 289HP had 10.5" No factory 11" for the 289.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 12, 2009
#3
  • Jul 12, 2009
  • #3
2+2GT said:
The 260, 289 2V, and 289 4V had the 10", and the 289HP had 10.5" No factory 11" for the 289.
Click to expand...

The 10.5 didn't come along till the 302HO in the late 70's early 80's. The 11" would have been with the 164 tooth truck bell or in a big car like a Galaxie.
 

oldcarguy

New Member
Jul 6, 2009
3
0
0
Jul 13, 2009
#4
  • Jul 13, 2009
  • #4
OK, thanks

would the 10.5 be a up grade, or a better choice, since it was behind a little higher HP ? This isn't a perfect car, just a good driver, so I 'm for upgrades.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Jul 13, 2009
#5
  • Jul 13, 2009
  • #5
oldcarguy said:
OK, thanks

would the 10.5 be a up grade, or a better choice, since it was behind a little higher HP ? This isn't a perfect car, just a good driver, so I 'm for upgrades.
Click to expand...

You should be able to use the 10.5, that was the 289HP / BOSS 302 clutch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Vibration after new clutch
  • nipple_looker
  • Sep 20, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
655
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 26, 2026
fasterthangas
F
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
583
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
A
1987 5.0 speed density Foxbody crank no start
  • Alan2204
  • May 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
552
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 30, 2026
Mcmahst
M
1996 GT Speedometer electrical nightmare
  • moon96gt
  • Oct 7, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
164
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 17, 2026
CAMTWO1070
T
Drivetrain TREMEC TKX 1–2 Grinding Issue at ~4,000 Miles + Poor Warranty/Customer Service Experience
  • Ttopfoxguy
  • Oct 10, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
288
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 15, 2026
JMG9350
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?