• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

1966 mustang 289 Balance mystery

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wardy
  • Start date Start date Aug 15, 2019
W

Wardy

Member
Aug 15, 2019
4
1
13
Delaware
Aug 15, 2019
#1
  • Aug 15, 2019
  • #1
I have a 1966 mustang with a 289 and a balance issue. i have replaced the motor with engine code (05AE 6015E) i believe this motor is from a 64-65 Comet or Galaxy . So here is where it gets confusing, i am know i used the harmonic balancer from the 66 and put it onto the 64 motor. Since the i purchased a new harmonic balancer thinking that would solve the problem.. no it did not. Now i have moved to the flywheel. I believe i have a 50oz flywheel. To try to solve this mystery i have removed the trans and i intend on starting the car without the flywheel to see if i need to purchase a 0 balance flywheel. Is there a way i can determine what harmonic ballad and flywheel go with this crank without tearing the entire motor apart? Please help!

FYI.. I created this problem when i was 18, now here i am at 50 trying to fix it..lol

Wardy
 

horse sence

15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
12,289
8,146
233
Wile Coyote's stunt double
Aug 15, 2019
#2
  • Aug 15, 2019
  • #2
Um ...how will you start the motor with out a fly wheel ?
 
Reactions: 2Blue2

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Aug 16, 2019
#3
  • Aug 16, 2019
  • #3
horse sence said:
Um ...how will you start the motor with out a fly wheel ?
Click to expand...

Valid point . . . . .

Since it was not mentioned, all small block Fords from their introduction in the early 60's until about 1981 have a 28oz imbalance. From then on the 351w retained the 28 ounce but the 303 went to 50oz imbalance. From then on the 351w retained the 28 ounce but the 302 went to 50oz imbalance. None ever came with 0 balance from the factory (which is a performance mod). I suggest finding the block casting # to help narrow down the year of the block or pulling the oil pan to get the casting # off the crank (preferred.)

Here's an idea--if you remove the flywheel, look to see if you can prominately see the motor's rear main seal. If can see it it is more than likely a 1 piece seal used from 1981 and newer (50oz imbalance.) If you can only see the rear main cap it is the older 28oz design crank.

One final note is that both the balancer and the flywheel must match in imbalance and any other combos will not work smoothly. The matched pair must also match the imbalance of the crank being used.

There is a little more involved concerning crank interchange and aftermarket cranks but I'd first verify the info above before spending more money.
 
W

Wardy

Member
Aug 15, 2019
4
1
13
Delaware
Aug 16, 2019
#4
  • Aug 16, 2019
  • #4
dennis112 said:
Valid point . . . . .

Since it was not mentioned, all small block Fords from their introduction in the early 60's until about 1981 have a 28oz imbalance. From then on the 351w retained the 28 ounce but the 303 went to 50oz imbalance. From then on the 351w retained the 28 ounce but the 302 went to 50oz imbalance. None ever came with 0 balance from the factory (which is a performance mod). I suggest finding the block casting # to help narrow down the year of the block or pulling the oil pan to get the casting # off the crank (preferred.)

Here's an idea--if you remove the flywheel, look to see if you can prominately see the motor's rear main seal. If can see it it is more than likely a 1 piece seal used from 1981 and newer (50oz imbalance.) If you can only see the rear main cap it is the older 28oz design crank.

One final note is that both the balancer and the flywheel must match in imbalance and any other combos will not work smoothly. The matched pair must also match the imbalance of the crank being used.

There is a little more involved concerning crank interchange and aftermarket cranks but I'd first verify the info above before spending more money.
Click to expand...
Dennis, Thank you for your response. I am fully aware you cannot start the car without the flywheel. My intent was to figure out what I have in interchange the flywheel to see what one removes the vibration. This is the most expensive path.

Next question: is the flex plate and the Harmonic balance labeled to indicate the weight?

Thanks
 

2Blue2

will be trying this sex one when I can find it
Mod Dude
Mar 5, 2019
4,430
2,893
163
Oahu
Aug 16, 2019
#5
  • Aug 16, 2019
  • #5
Since you have had this combo for 32 years (since 87 or so) and I assume it was used then.
C6Ae block most likely will need 28 imbalance damper and flex plate
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Aug 16, 2019
#6
  • Aug 16, 2019
  • #6
Wardy said:
Next question: is the flex plate and the Harmonic balance labeled to indicate the weight?

Thanks
Click to expand...

There are no stampings used that would indicate weight.

If you can find a casting # it might help to identify the year. Front and rear photos may be compared to those found on the web. If you are going to buy parts and you are sure you have a 289, get them for 28oz imbalance.

Are you sure the motor doesn't have a miss instead?
 
W

Wardy

Member
Aug 15, 2019
4
1
13
Delaware
Aug 17, 2019
#7
  • Aug 17, 2019
  • #7
Dennis, thanks agin for you response. This is what i learned today.

Casting # C5AE 6015E this is a 289 for a 1965 Ford Galaxie.
Date code is # 4K24 this was manufactured on October 2nd in 1964.

1. I have removed the flex plate, it is a 157 tooth that measures 13 and 1/4". this is for the small bell housing of the C4 trans. The flex plate has no part numbers at all. I still do not know if this is a 28 or 50 OZ plate.

2. I inspected the rear end of the crank, no part numbers.

3. The harmonic Balancer had part # 594-269. i font this online to be a direct replacement for stock 289 -1966 Mustang and the 1964 Galixie but the weight spec was not shown online.

Do you think it is safe to say my 1964-289 requires a 28 oz flywheel?

any help is appreciated.

Thanks

Wardy
 

2Blue2

will be trying this sex one when I can find it
Mod Dude
Mar 5, 2019
4,430
2,893
163
Oahu
Aug 17, 2019
#8
  • Aug 17, 2019
  • #8
Wardy said:
it is safe to say my 1964-289 requires a 28 oz flywheel?
Click to expand...

It is safe to say a 289 needs a 28 0z flywheel or flex plate and harmonic balancer, Disclaimer~ unless the crank was swapped for a 5.0 crank (which is doubtful but not impossible)

Post a pic of your mustang, We all live for mustang pics here.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Aug 17, 2019
#9
  • Aug 17, 2019
  • #9
Yes it should be 28oz imbalance.

I doubt that the crank has been swapped out for a newer 5.0 as it (the 5.0) is designed to use a 1 piece crank seal. I don't think one can be used in the early block that you have.
 

2Blue2

will be trying this sex one when I can find it
Mod Dude
Mar 5, 2019
4,430
2,893
163
Oahu
Aug 20, 2019
#10
  • Aug 20, 2019
  • #10
update?
 
W

Wardy

Member
Aug 15, 2019
4
1
13
Delaware
Aug 20, 2019
#11
  • Aug 20, 2019
  • #11
2Blue2 said:
update?
Click to expand...
No flywheel came in today. I hope to get it on this weekend.
 
Reactions: 2Blue2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
922
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Wanting to replace my BOSS 351C Engine Harmonic Balancer - Questions about 'Balance?'
  • 69machmike
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
612
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 5, 2024
Realmongo
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
71
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
D
Brakes 1966 Mustang convertible 289, Auto - Disc brake conversion issues
  • DRGunn427
  • Feb 26, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
686
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jul 23, 2026
All Stock93
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
521
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?