• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

1968 DO0E heads better than E7TE's ????

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaidedeye
  • Start date Start date Aug 24, 2008

jaidedeye

Member
Apr 4, 2004
627
0
16
Goldsboro nc
Aug 24, 2008
#1
  • Aug 24, 2008
  • #1
im rebuilding my 68 302. i have the 58cc chamber DO0E 302 heads on the motor.

trying to figure out if i should spend the money and have the original heads rebuilt with new hardened valve seats or just look for a nice used set of E7TE's?

ive been quoted $280 for a valve job and hardened seats...but "what if" i need other head work? are the DO0E heads worth the extra exspense?

also, on a 68 302 block are there any drawbacks to using the E7's? i know i read on 289's there are.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 24, 2008
#2
  • Aug 24, 2008
  • #2
There were no 1968 D0OE heads. You have a later set of heads there. The "D0" means they were first produced in the 1970 model year, so the earliest they will have been cast was late 1969. Look in the rocker valley. Cast there you will find eitehr 302 or 351. If they're 351 heads, they'll have the slightly larger valves and ports (1.84/1.54 vs the 302's 1.78/1.48) The 351's will also have 8 intake bolts per side with "L" shaped coolant ports. These D0OE heads are a litlte better head than E7TE's. If they're 302 heas, then you might start a bit ahead with E7TE's (then port them before using)
 

jaidedeye

Member
Apr 4, 2004
627
0
16
Goldsboro nc
Aug 24, 2008
#3
  • Aug 24, 2008
  • #3
D.Hearne said:
There were no 1968 D0OE heads. You have a later set of heads there. The "D0" means they were first produced in the 1970 model year, so the earliest they will have been cast was late 1969. Look in the rocker valley. Cast there you will find eitehr 302 or 351. If they're 351 heads, they'll have the slightly larger valves and ports (1.84/1.54 vs the 302's 1.78/1.48) The 351's will also have 8 intake bolts per side with "L" shaped coolant ports. These D0OE heads are a litlte better head than E7TE's. If they're 302 heas, then you might start a bit ahead with E7TE's (then port them before using)
Click to expand...

well they say 302 cast into the head and D0OE in another area. so are the e7's better?

wil i lose alot of compression going to E7's?
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Aug 25, 2008
#4
  • Aug 25, 2008
  • #4
jaidedeye said:
well they say 302 cast into the head and D0OE in another area. so are the e7's better?

wil i lose alot of compression going to E7's?
Click to expand...



you will lose a ton of compression with the E7 heads, they have 64cc chambers vs the D0 heads' 58cc chambers. if it was me i'd do a mild home porting job and have the D0 heads redone, the E7's aren't a whole lot better than what you already have flow wise
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 25, 2008
#5
  • Aug 25, 2008
  • #5
Ditto, you might be just as better off doing the D0OE's. Or better yet shopping for a good used set of aluminum or already worked factory heads. By the time you spend money on machinework, screw in studs, guide plates, new valves (if they need em) springs & retainers, you can well have more money invested than just hunting down a used set. I did a set of E7's myself. Ported the exhaust sides, bowl blended them, cleanup & bowls on the intake sides and only needed a $80 valve job and new springs, all total I spent maybe $250 on em, plus another $120 for a set of used1.7 Cobra rockers. It all depends on what shape the heads are that you start with and how much of the work you do yourself. On the other hand I bought a used set of GT40Y's last year for $600 for my son. Seen other similarly priced sets of Ford Racing and Edelbrock heads too. It's not hard to spend that much or more on iron factory heads.
 

jaidedeye

Member
Apr 4, 2004
627
0
16
Goldsboro nc
Aug 27, 2008
#6
  • Aug 27, 2008
  • #6
im picking up a set of E7's for 50 bux. they have been rebuilt abd the guy did a headswap so he wants to get rid of them.

how much compression am i looking at loosing? will having the head shaved down a bit counter-act that? or should i look at getting a set of newer 302 pistons?
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Aug 27, 2008
#7
  • Aug 27, 2008
  • #7
going from a 58cc chamber to a 64 cc chamber you'll lose somewhere in the neighborhood of half a point to a full point
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 27, 2008
#8
  • Aug 27, 2008
  • #8
You can mill the E7's .040 and that'll get the chambers down to 57.8 cc's. If you want more removed then you may get into intake fitment issues, mainly due to the intake bolts moving toward the centerline of the engine. In that case you can "waller" the bolt holes in the intake to compensate for this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
275
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
945
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
P
Best heads for my build?
  • pettyeod
  • Nov 13, 2023
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 16, 2023
LILCBRA
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?