• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

1970 block, newer GT40p heads, EFI help

  • Thread starter Thread starter Js5ohLX
  • Start date Start date Apr 30, 2004
J

Js5ohLX

Member
Apr 5, 2004
287
0
16
Ohio
Apr 30, 2004
#1
  • Apr 30, 2004
  • #1
Ok, I'm helping my friend turn a 4cyl into injected 5.0. The motor he has is a 1970 block with new gt40p heads. My concern is, can this motor be made to use roller lifters? If not, is there HO firing order cams for non roller applications? Any help would be appreciated, thanks.
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Apr 30, 2004
#2
  • Apr 30, 2004
  • #2
yeah, im pretty sure you can run a roller cam in it. like you said it just needs roller lifters. i dont think there is any differences structurally in the block. but i could be wrong. we need michael yount or some of those other smart guys
 
J

Js5ohLX

Member
Apr 5, 2004
287
0
16
Ohio
Apr 30, 2004
#3
  • Apr 30, 2004
  • #3
I know roller lifters will go in it, but you need a way to hold them from turning. That's where I'm a little concerned.
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Apr 30, 2004
#4
  • Apr 30, 2004
  • #4
yeah, if you get a set of roller lifters off of a 5.0 engine in a junk yard grab the little spider that connects to all of them..its just a metal piece that holds them. i think that is what you need
 
J

Js5ohLX

Member
Apr 5, 2004
287
0
16
Ohio
Apr 30, 2004
#5
  • Apr 30, 2004
  • #5
cool, I saw that, but I didn't know that it would work with all the fomoco blocks, thanks
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Apr 30, 2004
#6
  • Apr 30, 2004
  • #6
Houston we have a problem. The roller lifters are longer than standard flat tappets. So my understanding is that when you use them in an early block with a standard base circle roller cam it pushes them up too high - they interfere with the dog bones. So, you either need to use a smaller base circle cam (which lowers the lifters - the block will have to be drilled in the lifter valley so the spider which holds down the dog bones can be installed), or go with a set of aftermarket linked lifters (expensive). The cam you pick will determine the firing order. If you intend to use efi - you need to match the computer you're using to the cam in terms of firing order. So, a computer out of an HO (Mustang, Lincoln) will be needed to use an HO-based firing order cam. Clear as mud?
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Apr 30, 2004
#7
  • Apr 30, 2004
  • #7
double post
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Apr 30, 2004
#8
  • Apr 30, 2004
  • #8
Houston we have a problem. The roller lifters are longer than standard flat tappets. So my understanding is that when you use them in an early block with a standard base circle roller cam it pushes them up too high - they interfere with the dog bones. So, you either need to use a smaller base circle cam (which lowers the lifters - the block will have to be drilled in the lifter valley so the spider which holds down the dog bones can be installed), or go with a set of aftermarket linked lifters (expensive). And after you go through all that, you'll likely need custom length pushrods as well. The cam you pick will determine the firing order. If you intend to use efi - you need to match the computer you're using to the cam in terms of firing order. So, a computer out of an HO (Mustang, Lincoln) will be needed to use an HO-based firing order cam. Clear as mud? You'll have to talk to the cam companies about HO firing order cams in a flat tappet grind. Be VERY specific about the firing order you want and the fact that it's not a roller, if you end up going that route.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
336
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
416
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
G
Engine Is this a HO or non-ho?
  • Gnfanatic
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
240
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2024
Gnfanatic
G
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
292
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
1970 Boss block
  • Sparky714
  • Dec 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
684
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 7, 2024
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?