• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Electrical 1987 - IAC valve (Diode & Ohms)

  • Thread starter Thread starter R82148V
  • Start date Start date Nov 12, 2021
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Nov 23, 2021
#21
  • Nov 23, 2021
  • #21
Consider building a smoke machine. Not that complicated to make and comes in very handy.

View: https://youtu.be/crc6CJ_ni2w


I’m actually building one right now. Just waiting on a few parts from Amazon to show up.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Nov 23, 2021
#22
  • Nov 23, 2021
  • #22
Mustang5L5 said:
Consider building a smoke machine. Not that complicated to make and comes in very handy.

View: https://youtu.be/crc6CJ_ni2w


I’m actually building one right now. Just waiting on a few parts from Amazon to show up.
Click to expand...
How do you fell of your homemade smoke machine is burning up?
The PVC case on the videos I have watched made that a serious question.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Nov 23, 2021
#23
  • Nov 23, 2021
  • #23
7991LXnSHO said:
How do you fell of your homemade smoke machine is burning up?
The PVC case on the videos I have watched made that a serious question.
Click to expand...

Don’t temp me with over engineering a $40 DIY machine into a $400 machine. Because I can
 
Reactions: General karthief and 7991LXnSHO

R82148V

Active Member
May 26, 2020
256
59
38
.....
Nov 24, 2021
#24
  • Nov 24, 2021
  • #24
That thing is fantastic! Smoke machine, where have you been! Absolutely I'm going to build one for vac leak testing..
 

R82148V

Active Member
May 26, 2020
256
59
38
.....
Dec 1, 2021
#25
  • Dec 1, 2021
  • #25
UPDATE

I was able to confirm that the Cruise control Servo and brake booster holds vac very well. No leaks there.
I did however find a major leak within the HVAC line and narrowed it down to the line that is inside the car. I capped off the main line from the vac tree and retested the idle.. WOW what a difference in idle! No surging or hunting or anything! I went to set base idle again and was able to get the idle lower with the IAC unplugged but still not low enough. I looked for more vac leaks and discovered a slight leak at the EGR valve. Between the plunger and diaphragm. I sprayed a little brake cleaner in there while it was running and it changed idle speed. A new EGR should be arriving today from RockAuto.

I also performed a KOER test for codes. Came back with code 44 & 94. Tab and Tad solenoids are working, crossover pipe and engine ports are clean. Bypass and Diverter valves are functioning when applying manual vacuum. Air pump is moving air when car is running but I dont know how much it should be. When I went to check on the vac lines coming from the tab and tad solenoids, the hard lines snapped. So I'm guessing vac leaks there are causing the 44 & 94.. I cant think of anything else.

Any other ideas?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Dec 1, 2021
#26
  • Dec 1, 2021
  • #26
Biggest culprit is the ports inside the heads themselves get clogged up. The path runs front to back through the head with perpendicular pathways to the exhaust ports.


And yeah...it's amazing how sensitive these cars are to vacuum leaks, especially 86-88 speed density cars as their fuel/timing curves are based primarily on manifold pressure. A small leak will change that
 
Reactions: R82148V

R82148V

Active Member
May 26, 2020
256
59
38
.....
Dec 1, 2021
#27
  • Dec 1, 2021
  • #27
Mustang5L5 said:
Biggest culprit is the ports inside the heads themselves get clogged up. The path runs front to back through the head with perpendicular pathways to the exhaust ports.


And yeah...it's amazing how sensitive these cars are to vacuum leaks, especially 86-88 speed density cars as their fuel/timing curves are based primarily on manifold pressure. A small leak will change that
Click to expand...
I had no idea, these years especially, were that sensitive to vac leaks. That's all you hear/ read about is vac leaks if you have surging, hunting idle. Everyone was so right!

That must be basically impossible to fully clean out.. I tried cleaning the openings to the heads about 3 inches in.. That was as far as I was able to reach..
I guess as long as air is being pumped into the exhaust, Shouldn't worry about the codes so much?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Dec 1, 2021
#28
  • Dec 1, 2021
  • #28
The answer to that question all depends on if you have cats. And if you do, do you have a stock 4-cat H-pipe or 2-cats?

If you don't have cats. None of that stuff matters at all. Plug it all up, disconnect the TAD/TAB and live with the codes. They don't set off the CEL and don't alter the way the ECU functions.


If you have a 2-cat H-pipe, it also doesn't matter. Here's why. The air pump system supplies o2 to the converters to make them more effective. These old cats relied on heat and O2 to be efficient. When you first start a cold Mustang, the cats simply aren't warm enough to do their job. SO ford added two small cats close to the headers so they would heat up quickly and do their job more efficiently. As a result, when you first start the car the TAD and TAB direct the airflow to the heads (specifically the exhaust ports) where the O2 flows into the headers and down into the first set of cats to help them be more efficient.

Once the vehicle is warmed up, the TAD switches the routing of the air from the air pump down to the lower set of main cats and this is where it will stay until the vehicle cools down again. This is why the heads and crossover tube tend to fill up with carbon. They only flow for a short period of time.

For the 2-cat pipes, you replumb the air pump if you'd like to just function for the main cats. This all depends on the setup of course, as my catted Bassani X-pipe has the air pump tube enter AFTER the cats rendering it completely useless. But if you wanted, you can just remove the diverter valve and the crossover tube plumbing and just cap off the TAD vacuum port. Leave the TAB and bypass valve in place and the car will just enter bypass the air to atmosphere or send it down to the H-pipe.

If you don't want to deal with the codes, a pair of 65-90ohm resistors should take care of the KOEO codes (81 & 81 i think) but you will still get the 41 & 91 when you do the Engine running codes.

Not a big deal.


Long winded i know, but helps to know how the air pump system work and what it's intent was.
 

R82148V

Active Member
May 26, 2020
256
59
38
.....
Dec 1, 2021
#29
  • Dec 1, 2021
  • #29
5L5, I love all your info. I’m learning a ton! I really do appreciate it and your time.

I just looked and I have the 4 cat H-pipe.

I’m wondering if perhaps I have the tab and tad vacs switched. which is the tab and which is the tad? My haynes manual shows the tab is closest the fender and tad is closest the engine? Every where I look online though they are saying the opposite.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Dec 1, 2021
#30
  • Dec 1, 2021
  • #30
Per the factory EVTM

TAB is towards the outside of the car and TAD is closest to the engine.

TAB is white/red wire to pin 51 on the ECU
TAD is light green/black wire to pin 11

Those are ECU controlled grounds. The other wire should have constant 12V



 
Last edited: Dec 1, 2021
Reactions: 7991LXnSHO

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Dec 1, 2021
#31
  • Dec 1, 2021
  • #31
I dunno if you've seen this diagram, but this will visualize the air pump system. Flow is to the heads during warmup to feed the first cats (not shown here) and then it's directed to the main pair of cats when the vehicle is warm. I believe at WOT, the bypass dumps all the O2 to atmosphere.

 
Reactions: 7991LXnSHO

R82148V

Active Member
May 26, 2020
256
59
38
.....
Dec 2, 2021
#32
  • Dec 2, 2021
  • #32
Mustang5L5 said:
I dunno if you've seen this diagram, but this will visualize the air pump system. Flow is to the heads during warmup to feed the first cats (not shown here) and then it's directed to the main pair of cats when the vehicle is warm. I believe at WOT, the bypass dumps all the O2 to atmosphere.

Click to expand...
Excellent diagram! After studying this, the factory EVTM pic you sent, using the wiring diagram and item description pic from my haynes manual, I come to realize the tab and tad wiring and vac lines were reversed. Your stating TAB is towards the outside of the car and TAD is closest to the engine. My manual showed that too..

Per the wiring diagram from Haynes, had the wiring reversed.
I had the RED and GREEN wires going to the TAB.. In this diagram, it shows the RED and GREEN is supposed to go to the TAD.
Doing KOEO, I always pull Code 11, but KOER its always 44 & 94. Cant wait to try this reversal tonight!!

 

R82148V

Active Member
May 26, 2020
256
59
38
.....
Dec 13, 2021
#33
  • Dec 13, 2021
  • #33
UPDATE

So I was able to check all the wiring from the PCM back to the TAD. Verified the tad was receiving 12 volts and that the solenoid worked by grounding it out. You can hear it clicking on and off. Started the car and was able to confirm both TAB and TAD valves were receiving vacuum during warmup. SO the TAD solenoid is confirmed working! I think it was a bad connection on the PCM pin that did it.
Anyway, I ran the car to opt temp and performed the code reader. It still came back with codes 94 and 44 even though the tad is working.
I checked the air pump and it blows air. How strong it supposed to be I have no idea but you can definitely feel air blowing out. TAB AND TAD valves open and close without issue when putting a hand vac to them. Crossover tube is clear and clean. I took off the crossover pipe last night and confirmed.
The ports on the back of the heads are clean but only about 3 inches in. I was able to use a long drywall screw to see if its still packed in there and it is. I can screw in the screw and pull out this moist black crud. I have no idea how that stuff gets packed in there. But I'm sure that is my issue.

know the ports run from back to front of the heads and with the ports being so close to the firewall, how do you clean that stuff out!
I think I read somewhere that you can clean out the ports from the front of the engine too? Is that true and where do I look?
I was also looking for a diagram of what the ports look like.
Any ideas!


Thank you!!!
 

R82148V

Active Member
May 26, 2020
256
59
38
.....
Oct 9, 2023
#34
  • Oct 9, 2023
  • #34
Hello.

just a confusing question on this IAC diode dilemma. Everyone says that 87-88 foxes have an IAC diode in the wiring harness at the valve electrical connection. 89 - 93 have them in the valve and not the harness. Mine is in the harness. Everybody also says you can no longer purchase an IAC valve without a diode built into the valve. That all new re manufactures come with diodes and you’re not supposed to have a diode in the valve and the wiring harness. To know if you have a diode in the valve, there will be a D on the plastic connection part of the valve. My valve shows a 4D. Here is the strange part. To double check there is a diode in the valve, you use an ohms meter on the valve connector tabs. One direction should show 7-13 ohms and the other direction would be OL. If the valve doesn’t have a diode built in the test would show 7-13ohms both ways. When I test mine, it’s showing 10 ohms both ways. How can this be when there is a 4D stamped on it ? This is part number F0AE-9F715-B1A. I purposely purchased this one since its for an 89 so I would be able to snip out the one on the harness But now I don’t know if I should. Does the 4D Mean it has the diode built in even though ohms testing tells otherwise?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Oct 9, 2023
#35
  • Oct 9, 2023
  • #35
The F0 part number is a 1990 engineering part number, signifying that part was made in 1990 or later. It will have a diode in it.

The diode and solenoid are in parallel, so you are still reading through the solenoid in both directions.
 

R82148V

Active Member
May 26, 2020
256
59
38
.....
Oct 10, 2023
#36
  • Oct 10, 2023
  • #36
Mustang5L5 said:
The F0 part number is a 1990 engineering part number, signifying that part was made in 1990 or later. It will have a diode in it.

The diode and solenoid are in parallel, so you are still reading through the solenoid in both directions.
Click to expand...
Ah that makes complete sense after you explain it that way.. I couldnt for the life of me figure out why the ohms read the same no matter how the meter probes where even with that D on there.

I snipped out the diode in the harness a while back since there was a D on it. Then I started to have second thoughts about it and did the ohms test to clarify.. When I saw the same reading both ways. I panicked and put the diode back in line.. Now the idle hangs above 1000, there is a little surging and is not a clean drop in rpm when off the throttle. It wasnt like this when the diode was out but I was too nervous to take it out up until your explanation.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Oct 10, 2023
#37
  • Oct 10, 2023
  • #37
The reason it's in parallel is to basically short circuit the coil when it's deenergized and lets the internal resistance of the coil deplete the energy stored. Basically it's a constant loop until depleted. Without it, you get voltage spikes back to the ECU.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Alternative IACs?
  • Ethereal_Zer0
  • May 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
567
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 7, 2025
CAMTWO1070
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1996–1998 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
727
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
888
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
F
Resolved Stumble issue upon acceleration (1987 GT)
  • FoxDude87
  • Sep 16, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
54
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 3, 2024
FastDriver
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
340
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?