• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

1987 lincoln

  • Thread starter Thread starter anderson sc
  • Start date Start date Feb 7, 2009

anderson sc

New Member
Feb 6, 2009
14
0
0
anderson sc
Feb 7, 2009
#1
  • Feb 7, 2009
  • #1
what can I use off an 1987 lincoln, on my 67 coup 6 cly. Brakes, motor,tranny steering column, axles, ect? Thanks for any input!!
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Feb 8, 2009
#2
  • Feb 8, 2009
  • #2
I use the 8.8" rear end with rear disc fom an '84 lincoln...you might be able to do the same, though the spring perches ned to be re-welded....also you will wantto measure the width to be sure....most likely you'll be able to use the engine and tranny too...if you take the ECU and wiring harnesses from the lincoln...I doubt you'll be able to use the front disc stuff though
 

calpolymustang

Member
Feb 1, 2004
217
0
16
Santa Rosa, CA
Feb 8, 2009
#3
  • Feb 8, 2009
  • #3
I have an engine, AOD transmission, and driveshaft from an 87. I know my profile says 88, but its a very late 87, which has the "E code" 225hp 5.0 HO motor with E7TE heads. This is the same bottom end as an 88 mustang or mark vii. I'm using a carb, so i didnt care about the speed-density fuel injection, which is inferior to the later model mass-air design.

The majority of the 87 mark vii's have the "M code" 200hp engine with e6 heads, which dont flow as well. but, if you get some AFR 165cc heads or equivalent, you're in good shape.

You can decode your VIN here:
http://thelincolnmarkviiclub.org/documents/tech/vehicleIdentificationNumber.pdf

As far as the driveshaft goes, I had my driveshaft shortened and the end was modified to work with my 8" rear end.
Also, it has a harmonic dampener on the transmission yolk, and supports much stronger u-joints than the 66 setup. (i used spicer joints)
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Feb 8, 2009
#4
  • Feb 8, 2009
  • #4
I think the 87 still had speed density EFI instead of a mass air flow setup. I would switch it to carb and bolt it in. Check the V8 swap sticky for more info on that.
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Feb 8, 2009
#5
  • Feb 8, 2009
  • #5
people always rag on speed density, but the truth is mass air only has one advantage, and thats automatically adapting to minor(I stress the minor part here) mods....speed density is fine....if you dont like it you can convert to mass air....personally I will never use a mass air setup, I think the mass air sensor is another useless sensor that contributes to throttle hesitation on EFI cars.(at least from my understanding, the lag between the time the air is measured and actually enters the intake ports, at least naturally aspirated speaking) To me, the best system is a programmable speed density setup....true, you have to re-tune for every mod(for an ideal tune anyway) but you dont have to deal with MAF sensor costing hundreds of dollars you have to upgrade...the throttle hesitation doesnt exist, and its a simpler system and I am all for keeping EFI simple...the OEMs try to complicate it too much)

From my understanding, hardware to re-flash ford ECUs(speed density or mass air) is readily available
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Feb 8, 2009
#6
  • Feb 8, 2009
  • #6
Aftermarket speed density setups are just fine but the Ford speed density system from the 80 sux. If I was going speed density in a classic, I'd just the Ford ECU and use a megasquirt.
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Feb 8, 2009
#7
  • Feb 8, 2009
  • #7
megasquirt ftw any day, but even stock speed density is better than a carb if you ask me....but then, I understand EFI a lot better than I used to now
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Feb 8, 2009
#8
  • Feb 8, 2009
  • #8
Honestly, I'd say it really depends on which carb and who tunes it. The newer carbs like the Street Avengers are really nice. I think I'd take a Street Avenger over a stock Ford Speed density system. Now a Street Avenger over a good MS speed density setup ? I don't know about that, I think the MS wins that battle.
 

anderson sc

New Member
Feb 6, 2009
14
0
0
anderson sc
Feb 8, 2009
#9
  • Feb 8, 2009
  • #9
Thanks all for your imput!!!!
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,213
17,895
224
Massachusetts
Feb 8, 2009
#10
  • Feb 8, 2009
  • #10
Is it a Lincoln town car? Or a Mark 7?

Makes a difference
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Drivetrain 1987 Mustang notch drive questions
  • Shannonfox123
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
119
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 12, 2026
AeroCoupe
J
can you use the heads off a H O 302 to put on a regular 302 engine
  • Jan H
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
294
Other Auto Tech May 17, 2026
nickyb
T
Need help locating 67 dash horn wire
  • THS70
  • Nov 21, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
209
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Dec 5, 2025
THS70
T
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
476
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
T
1967 coupe gearing
  • TMVT
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
111
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 6, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?