• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

2.3L to 351w carbed

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahrpr
  • Start date Start date Aug 1, 2007

ahrpr

New Member
Sep 20, 2004
7
0
0
Aug 1, 2007
#1
  • Aug 1, 2007
  • #1
I am looking at a 4cyl to a 350w EFI swap.

I was wondering if anyone had a guide or step-by-step to this swap. I am kind of on a tight budget too, so the cheapest possible swap would be the best?

Would it be cheaper to go carbed, or more expensive?

I have swapped motors before, but it was a Honda and I am just now getting into bigger V8s and domestic cars.

Thanks for your information in advance.
 

KAILUAZ

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
333
0
0
St Pete, FL via Kailua, HI
Aug 1, 2007
#2
  • Aug 1, 2007
  • #2
Here is one of many threads on the subject (this one is in the FAQ):
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=589036
 

88mouse

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
630
0
0
Mooresville nc
Aug 1, 2007
#3
  • Aug 1, 2007
  • #3
If your on a buget would be cheaper to go with a 302. I just did a 4cyl to 302 swap then blowed the motor up. So now im going to go 351w. You will need a different oil pan, headers, motor mounts, fuel lines, and a few other small things.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Aug 1, 2007
#4
  • Aug 1, 2007
  • #4
88mouse said:
If your on a buget would be cheaper to go with a 302. I just did a 4cyl to 302 swap then blowed the motor up. So now im going to go 351w. You will need a different oil pan, headers, motor mounts, fuel lines, and a few other small things.
Click to expand...

same motor mounts. But you will need to cut a hole in the hood or get a cowl hood.
 

ahrpr

New Member
Sep 20, 2004
7
0
0
Aug 1, 2007
#5
  • Aug 1, 2007
  • #5
Is there any difference between EFI and Carbed?

Would I find more hp for less dollar out of carbed and would it effect the swap any?
 

ahrpr

New Member
Sep 20, 2004
7
0
0
Aug 1, 2007
#6
  • Aug 1, 2007
  • #6
ahrpr said:
Is there any difference between EFI and Carbed?

Would I find more hp for less dollar out of carbed and would it effect the swap any?
Click to expand...

I was looking at longblocks, and I was wondering what you guys thought about this?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Remanufactured-77-93-Ford-351-Windsor-Long-Block-Engine_W0QQitemZ290143481911QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item290143481911
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Aug 1, 2007
#7
  • Aug 1, 2007
  • #7
It may be cheaper to start with a 351W if you're going to buy an aftermarket intake and headers....since if you buy that stuff for a 302 and then turn around and swap to a 351 you'll be buying parts twice.

Also you can make it fit under a stock hood....you just have to use a Performer intake and one of those cheap triangle breathers...but i'd just go without a breather personally.
 

88mouse

New Member
Apr 18, 2007
630
0
0
Mooresville nc
Aug 1, 2007
#8
  • Aug 1, 2007
  • #8
86bluecobra said:
same motor mounts. But you will need to cut a hole in the hood or get a cowl hood.
Click to expand...

Ever body has been telling me that i would have to change to a different set. But I didn't think so, Thanks for the info.
 

Mustang78

New Member
Feb 8, 2006
486
0
0
Aberdeen, WA
Aug 1, 2007
#9
  • Aug 1, 2007
  • #9
i used lowered solid mounts(3/4" lower), edelbrock performer intake and an edelbrock 650 carb with no spacer, also my air cleaner has a 5/8" rise base(you can buy a lowered base) and a 2" element, the 351w clears by 2" at the front edge of the air cleaner lid with the pace car scoop, i'd imagine there would be about an inch under a stock hood

~Mark~
 

ahrpr

New Member
Sep 20, 2004
7
0
0
Aug 1, 2007
#10
  • Aug 1, 2007
  • #10
Mustang78 said:
i used lowered solid mounts(3/4" lower), edelbrock performer intake and an edelbrock 650 carb with no spacer, also my air cleaner has a 5/8" rise base(you can buy a lowered base) and a 2" element, the 351w clears by 2" at the front edge of the air cleaner lid with the pace car scoop, i'd imagine there would be about an inch under a stock hood

~Mark~
Click to expand...

So, I understand that the carbed motor would be easy to install, because i will be using a manual T-5 transmission so I won't have to deal with the computer, although I am wondering how you rewired the ignition to work with the carbed motor?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
322
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
J
Fox body - godzilla, coyote, or 408w stroker - Best route for budget build?
  • jaygee15
  • Jan 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2025
2000xp8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
887
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?