• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

2 vacuum advance hose connections on a 289?

  • Thread starter Thread starter garystocker
  • Start date Start date Oct 17, 2006

garystocker

Member
Jan 2, 2005
305
0
17
New Jersey
Oct 17, 2006
#1
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #1
I have the base timing at 6BTC with the vacuum advance line disconnected and plugged. When reconnected the timing advances 20 degrees at idle! I am told this is due to a vacuum advance connection with a constant vacuum source as opposed to ported, which will give me no vacuum at idle.

The edelbrock carb has 2 vacuum connections on the front. The one on the left is ported. Both lines are connected to the distributor.

The right side (constant vacuum, even at idle) is connected to the outside diaphrame connection. The left side (ported) on the carb is also connected to the diaphram unit, only more toward the distributor.

Do I need to switch those lines? Do stock 289 distributors have 2 vacuum lines connected to the carb? If so, how are they connected? Which side is ported? UGH!!

Here is my theory. The constant vacuum should be connected to the inner port on the distributor diaphram unit which keeps a suction on the diaphram toward the distributor, preventing vacuum advance. The other side of the diaphram has a ported connection which does not pull until hihs RPMs are achieved. Then the diaphram is sucked away from the distributor, pulling the breaker plate and advancing the timing.

What do you all think about this?

I need a push in the right direction...
 

GoinBroke

New Member
Jul 13, 2006
109
0
0
Joliet, Il
Oct 17, 2006
#2
  • Oct 17, 2006
  • #2
The manifold vacume should be to the inboard port on the dizzy and the ported vacume should be on the outside port.
 

jcode68

Active Member
Jul 15, 2003
892
1
29
Massachussetts
Oct 18, 2006
#3
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #3
I had a dual diaphram advance on my original 302 for my 68 Mustang. If I recall properly, the connections were made to a ported vaccum source on one side at the carb(don't recall which) and the other was connected to a thermostatically controlled port off the manifold. I guess when the temp reached a certain point, it would open or close the port for vacuum. I know my response probably only adds more confusion and not a solution. I don't think the dual diaphram units added any real benefit, so if your not hung up on being original, I would replace the advance with a single unit available from most parts stores. Cost should be $20 or less and will simplify the hookup and probably be more reliable, especially if yours is the original unit.
 
R

Rapid

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
297
1
0
Columbia, SC
Oct 18, 2006
#4
  • Oct 18, 2006
  • #4
My Edelbrock has the ported vent on the passenger side of he carb. I am running that side on my 289. I understand that base timeing, about 10-12 at idle no vac.Vacume advance is for idle and total timing which should be around 34 at 3500 rpm. The vac advance takes over after idle and gets the engine going till the centrifical weights take over. I have mine set about 12 at idle, 19 total advance with vacume and weights that advance the rest of the way by 3500 rpm. It runs well with no pinging and great throttle response.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
312
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
827
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
H
Engine 1987 5.0 HO vacuum hose locations
  • harryhaber
  • Jun 20, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
514
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 21, 2025
limp
Weber Carburetor tuning help
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 6, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
90
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 19, 2026
SchwarzStock
D
Engine 85 GT Backfires through Carb
  • DienstXIV
  • Oct 3, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
706
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 7, 2025
85GTStangGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?