• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Engine 2000 gt p0172 p0175 nightmare...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Richi22
  • Start date Start date Dec 23, 2018
R

Richi22

New Member
Dec 23, 2018
3
0
1
97112
Dec 23, 2018
#1
  • Dec 23, 2018
  • #1
New pcm, injectors, plugs, coil packs, engine coolant temp sensor, MAF, thermostat, both up stream o2s, iac,.
 

wmburns

SN Certified Technician
Aug 14, 2009
5,892
514
204
Houston Texas
Dec 23, 2018
#2
  • Dec 23, 2018
  • #2
Have you replaced all of those parts in an attempt to "fix" the base problem?

We need to get you to put down the "parts changer" and test more.

Do you have an ODB2 scanner? Even better an ODB2 scanner with graphing capabilities.

ForScan ODB2 scanner w ELM327 USB
https://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/resources/forscan-odb2-scanner-w-elm327-usb.57/

If this were my car I would start by getting some base readings of the MAF, fuel pressure, and RPM's.

>>From Ford service manual
P0172 - System to Rich (Bank 1)
P0175 - System to Rich (Bank 2)


The Adaptive Fuel Strategy continuously monitors the fuel delivery hardware. The test fails when the adaptive fuel tables reach a lean calibrated limit. Refer to Section 1 , Powertrain Control Software, Fuel Trim for more information

Air Measurement System
  • MAF sensor (contaminated, damaged, corroded connector, etc.).
Fuel System
  • Fuel pressure regulator (vacuum hose off, diaphragm leak, malfunctioning, etc.).
  • Leaking fuel injectors.
  • Fuel return line restricted.
  • Fuel rail pressure sensor (incorrect reading).
  • EVAP canister purge valve leak (when canister is full).
Base engine
  • Engine oil contamination.
 
R

Richi22

New Member
Dec 23, 2018
3
0
1
97112
Dec 23, 2018
#3
  • Dec 23, 2018
  • #3
I have a scanner and the short term and long term are - 20. I have taken car to two dealership mechanics (which they both had for a week) and they had no clue. All sensors were tested ...I'm about to go get a vacuum smoke test done to see if I'm leaking anywhere but I'm lost
 
R

Richi22

New Member
Dec 23, 2018
3
0
1
97112
Dec 23, 2018
#4
  • Dec 23, 2018
  • #4
I bought the car like 7 months ago thinking it just needed a tune up with just over 102,000 miles but problem getting worse even after new parts.
 

OneSick99GT

Active Member
Nov 20, 2018
364
46
38
Dayton, Ohio
Dec 24, 2018
#5
  • Dec 24, 2018
  • #5
Richie,
Does this car have aftermarket parts. Did the original owner upload a tune to the vehicle. Why did you replace the CPM? The forscan software burns posted is a lifesaver. I downloaded it and bought the adapter online to observe my bank 1 and 2 fuel trims while tuning, after burns recommended it. Download the software, buy the adapter, run the program and watch the bank 1 and 2 fuel trims and post the results here. If you have questions on how to graph the data I can help. I'm really familiar with forscan after using it for the past 3 weeks every single day dialing in my tune.

Before you get a vacuum smoke test done buy the adapter and download the software. The software is free and the adapter is less than 30 bucks on amazon.
 
Reactions: wmburns and Neuron

wmburns

SN Certified Technician
Aug 14, 2009
5,892
514
204
Houston Texas
Dec 24, 2018
#6
  • Dec 24, 2018
  • #6
Richi22 said:
I have a scanner and the short term and long term are - 20. I have taken car to two dealership mechanics (which they both had for a week) and they had no clue. All sensors were tested ...I'm about to go get a vacuum smoke test done to see if I'm leaking anywhere but I'm lost
Click to expand...
FWIIW, With negative LTFT's the PCM is attempting to take away fuel (rich). A vacuum leak isn't likely to cause this. The LTFT's should be positive when there's a vacuum leak. So if this were my car I wouldn't spend my $$'s on a smoke test just yet.

Some example of things that might cause large negative LTFT's are:
  • MAF over reporting air flow.
  • FRPS: disconnected or leaking FRPS intake vacuum reference line
  • FRPS reporting wrong values to PCM. Cross check with an external gauge.
  • PCM set up for stock fuel injectors where larger units actually installed.
  • Leaking fuel injectors.
  • Fuel injectors stuck open mechanically or electrically. Test with a "noid" style test light.
  • O2 sensors stuck rich. Test by using an ODB2 scanner to look for lean/rich switch frequency. Easily seen on graph. Be careful here. IF the mixture is truly rich then it would be expected to not have any O2 rich/lean switches.
  • bad PCM
  • EVAP system drawing in gas vapors from fuel tank. To rule out block off EVAP line and see if anything changes.
  • Base motor problem. Out of time. Leaking valves.
Do you want to remain lost and blame the dealer or are you looking for help to find the answer yourself?

With the large number of parts already replaced with no "fix" and the fact that "professional" mechanics couldn't find the problem likely means that this problem will require some thinking "outside the box". Seems unlikely it will be something a simple as a bad sensor. Perhaps check the base motor's health with a compression test and/or leak down test. While we are on the base motor, what about the possibility that the motor has skipped time?

Sappy saying for the day: There is no elevator to success. You have to take the steps.
 
Last edited: Dec 25, 2018
Reactions: OneSick99GT

wmburns

SN Certified Technician
Aug 14, 2009
5,892
514
204
Houston Texas
Dec 25, 2018
#7
  • Dec 25, 2018
  • #7
Onesick99GT said:
I'm really familiar with forscan after using it for the past 3 weeks every single day dialing in my tune
Click to expand...
Onesick99GT, It might be useful if you were to update and link one of your threads with some of your direct experiences using an advanced ODB2 scanner (like ForScan) to solve real world problems.

For example:
  • Some lessons learned
  • Example of how having quick access to data changed how you went about the trouble shooting "process".
  • How the forums help
  • Biggest surprise
  • Anything else that you can think of that someone else that is not familiar with ODB2 diagnosis can learn from.
 

OneSick99GT

Active Member
Nov 20, 2018
364
46
38
Dayton, Ohio
Dec 25, 2018
#8
  • Dec 25, 2018
  • #8
Here is one thread from trying to troubleshoot a start and stall issue. Only after downloading the software and buying the adapter did I figure it out that my tune was in fact corrupted and I needed a new tune. None of the parts I replaced needed replaced to begin with. The software and adapter burns linked above gave me everything I needed to observe, troubleshoot, identify the issue, then remedy the issue.

https://www.stangnet.com/mustang-forums/threads/99-gt-no-idle.907196/#post-9148062

The tune for my maf sensor was incorrect. This can happen after upgrading to a different maf sensor which in my case that's exactly what I did. Or by drastically changing the airflow or fuel system, which would require a new tune. Remember maf sensors are used for measuring the amount of air coming in to the intake. My tune got corrupted in my case and I didn't realize this until after replacing my IAC, TPS, and maf sensor. I went through weeks of testing each individual piece according to my ford mustang manual thinking I also had an electrical issue. If I had only downloaded the software earlier and reviewed the maf airflow to voltage and a few other graphs I would have had this problem solved much earlier without throwing money at it. Ill post some pictures of my before and after using the software to diagnose my maf sensor issue. It just needed calibrated which any tuner can do that owns the software.

Below is a picture before the tune. Notice how much distortion there was on the bank 1 and 2 fuel trims. They were super high and super low. Once I posted this on this forum @a91what was able to tell me my tune was off. All for 30 bucks I solved my problem and knew what I needed to do to fix it.

The actual forum of my problem and how I resolved the start and stall issue can be seen below.

https://stangnet.com/mustang-forums/threads/sct-advantage-iii-racer-pro-software.907433/

 
Last edited: Dec 25, 2018
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Help! 2003 GT misfire when hot
  • Modular03
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
387
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 13, 2026
Mustang5L5
A
P0036 P0056 P0137 P0157 2020 Ford Mustang GT
  • AmkoA
  • Jun 16, 2026
  • 2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
106
2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk Jun 16, 2026
AmkoA
A
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
344
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
C
99 mustang gt no signal to fire coils
  • Cerana04
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
133
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 4, 2025
Cerana04
C
G
Idle surging after warm up
  • GALLY3309
  • Jun 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
122
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 10, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?