• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

2001 GT vs. 2001 Cobra...

  • Thread starter Thread starter SVTStang03
  • Start date Start date Mar 26, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
S

SVTStang03

Banned
Dec 14, 2003
341
0
0
Fountain Hills, Arizona
Mar 26, 2004
#1
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #1
Hey, I know there have probably been a thousand + threads asking this. But what are the numbers on these two cars with THE SAME DRIVER? 1/4 mile and 0-60, etc?

Thanks guys!
 

xtrm281gt

New Member
Jul 31, 2003
152
0
0
Sacramento, CA
Mar 26, 2004
#2
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #2
i dunno man...

perhaps someone should lend me their cobra so we can get this guy some answers!
 
S

SVTStang03

Banned
Dec 14, 2003
341
0
0
Fountain Hills, Arizona
Mar 26, 2004
#3
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #3
There ya go
 
S

Solid Snake

Banned
Nov 26, 2002
940
0
0
GA
Mar 26, 2004
#4
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #4
Same driver in each car....... atleast a good .6-.8 sec and 3-6mph difference in the quarter.
 
S

SVTStang03

Banned
Dec 14, 2003
341
0
0
Fountain Hills, Arizona
Mar 26, 2004
#5
  • Mar 26, 2004
  • #5
Nice, any idea on 0-60?
 
S

Solid Snake

Banned
Nov 26, 2002
940
0
0
GA
Mar 27, 2004
#6
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #6
Well, according to the info I could find online, both go 0-60 in 5.4, although I suspect the Cobra is a tad quicker
 
S

SVTStang03

Banned
Dec 14, 2003
341
0
0
Fountain Hills, Arizona
Mar 27, 2004
#7
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #7
Hmmmmmm. Interesting. You'd think with the power/torque difference there would be some lower #'s on a 4v...
 
S

Solid Snake

Banned
Nov 26, 2002
940
0
0
GA
Mar 27, 2004
#8
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #8
SVTStang03 said:
Hmmmmmm. Interesting. You'd think with the power/torque difference there would be some lower #'s on a 4v...
Click to expand...

Thats the funny thing. The 4V makes a heck of a lot more power, but it comes higher in the RPM range. The 4V also lacks TQ in the lower RPM's. The 2V GT, on the other hand, makes it's TQ lower in the RPM range, therefor it can keep up 0-60, but after 60mph the GT see's Cobra taillights
 
B

Badd GT

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
418
0
17
Kansas City
Mar 27, 2004
#9
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #9
i would beat a buddy of mine in his 01 cobra when i had my late build 01 GT.
cobra was stock except for K&N.
my GT had a cai with a rotated maf (leaned car out),
pullies, NGK iridiums & a short throw. it dyno'd @ 245hp/295tq

i would beat him by about 1/2 car length. i would pull a car to 1 1/2 cars on him by end of 2nd gear, then he would gain about a car thru 3rd & shutting down after about 1-2 seconds in 4th gear. this was slightly longer than a 1/4 mile probably about 1450ft.

i still won by 1/2 car in little over 1/4 mile (powershifting)
he would be gaining from middle of 3rd gear
i ran a best of 13.60 @ 102.5 (average was 13.75)
i never cut a 60ft lower than 2.0 (average was 2.1)
i dont remember my 1/8 mile
elevation in K.C. is about 1000ft above sea level

they will beat a GT stock for stock same driver but lightly to mildly modded it is very even in 1320ft after that it is all cobra............. unless GT is heavily modded like my 02 (may 8th i will be dyno tuned, 4.10's, uca/lca & welded up torque boxes.

hope this helps some
 

dkshadow

Banned
May 12, 2003
952
0
0
TEXAS
Mar 27, 2004
#10
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #10
From a dead stop with an aggressive launch and good bolt ons.... You shouldnt have that much problems on the street with a stock cobra. From a roll thats a different story
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Mar 27, 2004
#11
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #11
Plus, the Cobra has IRS, it's not as good for drag racing. So it hurts the Cobra from a stop.
 
S

Solid Snake

Banned
Nov 26, 2002
940
0
0
GA
Mar 27, 2004
#12
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #12
Badd GT said:
i would beat a buddy of mine in his 01 cobra when i had my late build 01 GT.
Click to expand...

Be a pal and buy him some freakin driving lessons
 
S

SVTStang03

Banned
Dec 14, 2003
341
0
0
Fountain Hills, Arizona
Mar 27, 2004
#13
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #13
Yeah really, haha
 

23 Stang

New Member
Nov 5, 2003
41
0
0
Chicago, IL
Mar 27, 2004
#14
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #14
So true, 01 GT > 01 Cobra wtf?
 
S

SVTStang03

Banned
Dec 14, 2003
341
0
0
Fountain Hills, Arizona
Mar 27, 2004
#15
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #15
No, just the two cars both have their good areas... It's kinda a wash for the everyday driver seems like.
 

Black2001GT

Founding Member
Feb 12, 2001
1,267
0
36
Saints fan Stuck in FalCANTs country
Mar 27, 2004
#16
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #16
I have a hard time believing that a GT has more low end TQ than a Cobra. Any one have a Dyno of a 99 or 2001 Cobra?
 

Redfire03GT

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
395
0
0
Newark, CA.
Mar 27, 2004
#17
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #17
01 and below cobra's aren't known for their low end grunt. Hell, they don't even make a lot of peak torque. That's just by their design. But it goes both ways, by design, the cobra will make more peak hp with the same if not slightly lower peak torque, where as the 2v generally speaking, will make more torque with less hp. Mind you this is in an n/a application. Once blown, everything goes out the door.

Gears usually become a cobra's best friend because it damn near eliminates any low end problems. Basically, once the modding begins, it'll almost always be cobra > gt
 

Yellow01GT

Founding Member
Dec 14, 2001
1,127
0
36
Jefferson City, MO
Mar 27, 2004
#18
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #18
Redfire03GT said:
Basically, once the modding begins, it'll almost always be cobra > gt
Click to expand...

 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Mar 27, 2004
#19
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #19
Black2001GT said:
I have a hard time believing that a GT has more low end TQ than a Cobra. Any one have a Dyno of a 99 or 2001 Cobra?
Click to expand...
I don't have a dyno but that's 1 of the things about the Mach 1 engine, they improved it over the 99/01 Cobra engine to have more low end.
 

White360RFnSwee

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
869
0
0
West Palm Beach FL
Mar 27, 2004
#20
  • Mar 27, 2004
  • #20
Solid Snake said:
Same driver in each car....... atleast a good .6-.8 sec and 3-6mph difference in the quarter.
Click to expand...


wow.. that was a shot in the dark If Ive ever seen one lol....

The difference? about 4 mph... or about half a second in the 1/4 mile..

-Ryan
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
419
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
M
Help! 2003 GT misfire when hot
  • Modular03
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
326
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 13, 2026
Mustang5L5
B
2001 roush stage 3 - sat for 5 years
  • Brando_05
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
235
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
Brando_05
B
What's it Worth? 2000 GT
  • Mustang5L5
  • May 8, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
6
Views
246
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 13, 2026
KRUISR
Who the hell puts the wrong spark plugs in a 3.8L?
  • snowstang
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
387
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?