i'm not sure what was done to it. if it had a turbo, maybe he had the boost turned up a little.axeman said:last month at the track there was one running 13.5's. i though they were turbo charged.i'm not sure what was done to it. if it had a turbo, maybe he had the boost turned up a little.
MAC'n89Blckstng said:I say the N/A vs. N/A is really close if the car is stock. I've seen those Neons run 14.3. And I say the 100 shot leaves the neon in the dust.

speedytang said:My sons 2004 SRT-4 runs 13.2 at 105mph and it is 100% stock..
on that one too.
Imports such as Hondas were born here as gas savers and new cars for poor people, it should have stayed that way 
speedytang said:My sons 2004 SRT-4 runs 13.2 at 105mph and it is 100% stock. They even did more improvements on the SRT-4 for 2004 and with the Trac-Loc style front end now it just gets it. The best so far is a 1.85 60ft. This car I hate to say because of my earlier days of building Turbo 2.2 Shelby Chargers the SRT-4 is the cheapest,fastest car for the bucks. $20200 total + tax.
speedytang said:My sons 2004 SRT-4 runs 13.2 at 105mph and it is 100% stock. They even did more improvements on the SRT-4 for 2004 and with the Trac-Loc style front end now it just gets it. The best so far is a 1.85 60ft. This car I hate to say because of my earlier days of building Turbo 2.2 Shelby Chargers the SRT-4 is the cheapest,fastest car for the bucks. $20200 total + tax.
on that one.