• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

2011 Mustang on the Dyno!!! 395 rwhp

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kdubslugga
  • Start date Start date Mar 25, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 26, 2010
#41
  • Mar 26, 2010
  • #41
S&B said:
there comes a time in a mans life when fast doesnt really matter anymore, it kinda like when you date a girl with D cups for a year or two, big kazongas don't matter much anymore after that because you've had em and you know the problems with em.
Click to expand...


I just wanna clarify, big kazongas always matter. ALWAYS. Always. I mean ALWAYS. Trust me. Always. Because, like my Festiva, what happens when you find yourself without them? You realize you've taken them for granted and then that's all you want. They matter. They always matter. Always.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Mar 26, 2010
#42
  • Mar 26, 2010
  • #42
Bewbies are important.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 26, 2010
#43
  • Mar 26, 2010
  • #43
ill advised said:
And you were doing so well, Gearbanger. lol
Click to expand...

Just doing my part to shut down the dumb ass "pushrods rule"...."yeah, but all I have to do is build a stroker"...."LSX swap blah, blah, blah" comments before they start.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 26, 2010
#44
  • Mar 26, 2010
  • #44
Yeah well i'm swapping LSX heads onto my stroker so watch out
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 26, 2010
#45
  • Mar 26, 2010
  • #45
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Yeah well i'm swapping LSX heads onto my stroker so watch out
Click to expand...

Please post vids of initial start up.
 

1990Coupe

Founding Member
Mar 11, 2002
1,462
132
114
Toms River NJ
Mar 26, 2010
#46
  • Mar 26, 2010
  • #46
NikwoaC said:
Yea, I believe this platform will be around for a while, but I'd be willing to bet that this NA, traditionally-injected engine won't be around for too long. They intentionally designed this engine with provisions for design changes down the road, so I would be surprised if this Coyote lasts 5 years without some sort of a change. I mean, words like "boost" and "direct injection" have been tossed around a LOT in the interviews with the engineers behind the Coyote.
Click to expand...

I think you may be missing the point a little.. Just trying to understand so don't take this as me attacking whatsoever.

I think the engine will be around for a long time, - if they do head revisions, add boost, or DI, that does not change the basics of this engine. I'm sure our 5.0's and windsor engines went through changes in less then 5 years. I wouldn't be surprised if in a year or two a revised coyote came out. Hell the 5.0 in our foxes between 87-93 changed quite a bit. Heads, EGR stuff, cam's etc.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 26, 2010
#47
  • Mar 26, 2010
  • #47
If you guys think back to the '60s, engines came and gone is a matter of a few years. Look how long the Cammer 427 lasted and how badass that was. Granted it never got into a production car but still. Look at how the 427/428/429 engines came and went. Anyone wanna count how many different engines the Fox Mustang alone had? Still, i think this engine will be around at least a decade. The 4.6 was, and i've read that the Coyote has direct injection and ecoboost in its future and that alone will give it some longevity.
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Mar 26, 2010
#48
  • Mar 26, 2010
  • #48
Gearbanger 101 said:
Just doing my part to shut down the dumb ass "pushrods rule"...."yeah, but all I have to do is build a stroker"...."LSX swap blah, blah, blah" comments before they start.
Click to expand...

The new 5.0 is quite impressive. I'm interested to see how it responds to thing like heads, cams and an intake.

As long as we're still on the same page that LSX still owns everything. Other than bbc anyway.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 27, 2010
#49
  • Mar 27, 2010
  • #49
blackened88lx said:
The new 5.0 is quite impressive. I'm interested to see how it responds to thing like heads, cams and an intake.

As long as we're still on the same page that LSX still owns everything. Other than bbc anyway.
Click to expand...

Actually, I don't think we're on the same page at all?

Aftermarket cam grinds down the road I could see, but why would it need heads, or an intake? You do realize that the new 4V Coyote heads are the best flowing off the shelf heads Ford has produced to date, right? As it is, they outflow the current GT500 heads by 3%. That's nearly 340cfm? Why in gods name at this stage of the game would you need them to move any more than that? That's capable of moving more volume than any off the shelf and even most ported LS 1, 2, or 3 castings available.

And you just had to add that last part, didn't you? You LSX fan boys would love to believe that their engines are still cream of the crop, but at peaks levels, the LSX engines (depending on the head configuration and displacement) are reaching 70-90% volumetric efficiency at best. That doesn't quite cut it when you consider this new Coyote is seeing upwards of 90-100% volumetric efficiency for more than half its power band and upwards of 110% volumetric efficiency at peak torque.

Make all the excuses and all the "what if's" you'd like, but there's a reason that the 5.0L Coyote is making as much horsepower and torque as the current 6.2L LS3 with a full 1.2L less displacement.
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Mar 27, 2010
#50
  • Mar 27, 2010
  • #50
Gearbanger 101 said:
That's capable of moving more volume than any off the shelf and even most ported LS 1, 2, or 3 castings available.
Click to expand...
You don't know much about factory LS7 heads huh...
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Mar 27, 2010
#51
  • Mar 27, 2010
  • #51
This should be very interesting. I'm guessing 111-112mph trap speeds stock.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 27, 2010
#52
  • Mar 27, 2010
  • #52
blackened88lx said:
You don't know much about factory LS7 heads huh...
Click to expand...

You don't know much about reading comprehension, huh? Show me where I mentioned the LS7 heads?

Its funny you needed to pull heads feeding a 427ci ZO6, to an even bigger 454ci big bore/stroked crate engine to compete with the heads on a little 302ci Ford mill. And even then they only outflow the Coyote heads by 3% for all that displacement they feed.

Tell me again why I should be impressed that a big inch engine is fed by big inch heads again?
 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Mar 27, 2010
#53
  • Mar 27, 2010
  • #53
blackened88lx said:
You don't know much about factory LS7 heads huh...
Click to expand...

Will they outflow a set of Yates NASCAR heads? Because the Coyote's heads do!
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Mar 27, 2010
#54
  • Mar 27, 2010
  • #54
anyone have flow numbers for the coyote heads?
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Mar 27, 2010
#55
  • Mar 27, 2010
  • #55
im doing this because i can, pushrods rule
All hale the ford and LSx pushrod engine
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 27, 2010
#56
  • Mar 27, 2010
  • #56
90lxcoupe said:
anyone have flow numbers for the coyote heads?
Click to expand...

The Coyote head is said to outflow the Yates D3 heads, which flow 355cfm @ .475, so count on 360cfm or more from these new castings.

For comparision sake, off the shelf L92 heads flow about 325-330cfm on average.
Shaolin Crane said:
im doing this because i can, pushrods rule
All hale the ford and LSx pushrod engine
Click to expand...

Guess it was only a matter of time.
 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Mar 27, 2010
#57
  • Mar 27, 2010
  • #57
This is scary! I'm on Gearbanger's side!

Then again, it IS hard to argue with cold hard facts.

VERY cold facts for LS_ people.
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Mar 27, 2010
#58
  • Mar 27, 2010
  • #58
Gearbanger 101 said:
The Coyote head is said to outflow the Yates D3 heads, which flow 355cfm @ .475, so count on 360cfm or more from these new castings.

For comparision sake, off the shelf L92 heads flow about 325-330cfm on average.


Guess it was only a matter of time.
Click to expand...

yep im bored, and my car is getting painted so there is nothing else to do
 

foxforce33

New Member
Mar 25, 2010
82
0
0
Orange County, CA
Mar 27, 2010
#59
  • Mar 27, 2010
  • #59
I haven't been excited about a new Mustang in some time.

You can bet your a$$ I'll be at the Ford dealer test driving the new 5.0 when it arrives

Still, I grew up with the Fox cars so they will always be my favorite, regardless of what comes down the pike.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Mar 28, 2010
#60
  • Mar 28, 2010
  • #60
Duncan McDougal said:
Can someone who is a dyno operator please explain how a dynojet works if you are not using a gear that is 1:1?

Quote:
"Peak numbers are 365 lb-ft of torque at 4,350 rpm and 395 hp at 6,600 rpm. All of these at-the-wheels figures were obtained in 4th gear on a Dynojet 248 chassis dyno and include a 3% SAE weather correction factor."

From the Ford Spec sheet.

1st 3.66
2nd 2.43
3rd 1.69
4th 1.32
5th 1.00
6th 0.65
Final drive 3.31:1


http://media.ford.com/images/10031/2011_Mustang_GT_Specs.pdf
Click to expand...

There's a simple reason why the dyno run was done in 4th. It's the highest gear that could be used and still take the engine to the 7000rpm redline. Fifth gear would have fallen short and not given full dyno curves.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Intake
  • James S
  • Jul 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
262
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2026
James S
J
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
415
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
670
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
J
MEED HELP!! 86 mustang
  • Jacob0121
  • Jan 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
398
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
F
Fox 1990 Mustang GT 5.0 A9L – Engine suddenly shuts off but immediately restarts when key turned
  • FishermansFriend
  • Aug 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
509
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?