• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

22HP from customer tune, axleback, and midpipe

  • Thread starter Thread starter kenaimone
  • Start date Start date Oct 20, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
K

kenaimone

Member
Jun 8, 2004
85
0
6
Oct 20, 2007
#1
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #1
well i got my car up to the pro dyno yesterday. the current mods are steeda udps, c&l intake, brenspeed 93 octane tune, 4.10's, and a pypes violater axle back. the car made a best of 300 to the wheels. not that bad but it gets better. i have a great relationship the a shop in sumter south carolina called Macon Moore Performance. it turns out that the owner dave moore has been working hand in hand with an exhaust guy in california. well the prototype came in yesterday. so we put it on. it is a 3" mid pype and mufflers that have a four inch tip. well the sound is amazing not to mention what it made on the first pull we saw 312hp and 329tq. i was happy with that. well the second time it made 314hp and 330tq . everybody was happy except rob and dan at pro dyno. the air fuel was at 13.5 so he wanted to change it alittle. so i told him if he could beat brenspeed i will buy lunch. so i go to get the food and come back in shock. 322hp and 336tq. that is insane. pro-dyno is the best dyno shop in the south, rob and dan are great. i had a great time and now my car runs like a raped ape. as far as the exhaust the price is being worked out but i can tell you that you will get a stainless 3" mid pipe and a beautiful welded muffler a lot less than a bassini or magna flow. not to mention the fit. it was hung perfect in about 30 min. the tips fit perfect. i could not be happier. the exhaust has no real drone but you get a great sound under a hard exceleration. when i get back from korea the girl is going to get the kooks and high flow cats. we are really excited about what that might sound like. badassfast.com is the shop's website and pro-dyno.com is the dyno. i should be getting the dyno sheets and the pics by the end of the weekend. i am happy. i have to thank dave, matt, and todd at macon moore performance. also rob and dan at pro dyno, aka the best sct tuner in the country. they were all very generous.
ken
 
A

anticubicle

New Member
Jul 30, 2007
268
0
0
Oct 20, 2007
#2
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #2
Those are some nice #'s.

So let me get this straight, you gained 22 RWHP by switching out the mid-pipe AND axle-back combo? What brand is this?
 
K

kkdoughboy

New Member
Jul 20, 2007
212
0
0
Pennsylvania
Oct 20, 2007
#3
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #3
Sounds like the 98 octane really helped.
 

Leftoverchinese

Member
Apr 16, 2005
71
2
9
El Monte,CA
Oct 20, 2007
#4
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #4
22 whp from an axel back huh? I call
 
K

kenaimone

Member
Jun 8, 2004
85
0
6
Oct 20, 2007
#5
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #5
well everybody has an opinion and frankly yours sucks. i am telling that i got 22 with the cat back and a custom pro dyno tune. i will have the dyno graph soon but that might not be enough.

there is really no name for the exhaust. we are working on one now. i like the name KCB by Macon Moore Performance. ken's cat back.
 
R

RhinoGT

Member
May 23, 2006
46
0
6
Vilonia, AR
Oct 20, 2007
#6
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #6
Don't take Leftover's reaction personal. Everyone on these forums are sceptical of such claims. You have to understand that in the 3 years since the s197 has come out, no axle back, catback, or mid pipe combo has caused that much HP gain. In fact, it has been the consensous on all the forums that axle backs are for sound only, the best gain you may get is a few HP. The mid pipes typically gain between 5-15 HP over stock. Brenspeed is pretty hard to beat on their tunes and if all that gain was in the tune I'd be worried for the safety of your motor. Once again, It's not personal, we have just seen it time and time again.
 
K

kenaimone

Member
Jun 8, 2004
85
0
6
Oct 21, 2007
#7
  • Oct 21, 2007
  • #7
well than i am spot on. the axle back and mid pipe together made 17 hp on the brenspeed tune. the key might be that it is a 3" pipe vs the typical 2.5 now to tell you the truth the brenspeed tune leaned out. the tune on my car now makes more power and is safer. i dont want to bash brenspeed, they have been great to me, but unless you actually put the car on the dyno it is hard to get the tune perfect. safety with pro-dyno have never been in question.

oh and i had a feeling that some people would try to call bs but i left him the numbers for both shops and i challenge him to call. but i doubt that he will. another internet genius
 
S

ski

Member
Dec 14, 2004
380
2
18
Oct 21, 2007
#8
  • Oct 21, 2007
  • #8
Assuming all runs before and after the new exhaust install were SAE adjusted, then kudos on the numbers.
But are you saying that the Brenspeed tune also ran lean prior to the install? Because I can see it running lean(13.5) after the install due to the larger diameter on the exhaust.
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Oct 21, 2007
#9
  • Oct 21, 2007
  • #9
Did you get the 300 HP dyno result just before installation of the axle backs and then redynoed and tuned it on the same day? If not, there is no real accurate way to say how much they actually gained you. No doubt it did give a nice bump in power.
 
K

kenaimone

Member
Jun 8, 2004
85
0
6
Oct 21, 2007
#10
  • Oct 21, 2007
  • #10
no, the dyno compro was not done on the same day. the conditions on the good pull was better but you are right it is a great bump. to tell you the truth, to drive the car after the tune is night and day. no matter what, the car makes a ton more power and sounds great.
 

JTGrant

New Member
Aug 2, 2005
775
0
0
GA
Oct 21, 2007
#11
  • Oct 21, 2007
  • #11
kenaimone said:
well than i am spot on. the axle back and mid pipe together made 17 hp on the brenspeed tune. the key might be that it is a 3" pipe vs the typical 2.5 now to tell you the truth the brenspeed tune leaned out. the tune on my car now makes more power and is safer. i dont want to bash brenspeed, they have been great to me, but unless you actually put the car on the dyno it is hard to get the tune perfect. safety with pro-dyno have never been in question.

oh and i had a feeling that some people would try to call bs but i left him the numbers for both shops and i challenge him to call. but i doubt that he will. another internet genius
Click to expand...

To say that the brenspeed tune leaned out, I find that hard to beleive. I know that every car is different, but the tunes I received from Brenspeed and Bamachips were both on the rich side. I run a wideband and it is calibrated correctly (Lm1). A lot of times the dyno's calibration is off on their wideband. I had to lean out the tunes, I also had bamachips and brenspeed revise their tunes. Also I would think that without forced induction you would loose Hp and torque with a 3in system at lower to midrange RPM, given the displacement of our engines. 17HP from a mid-pipe on the Brenspeed tune is a huge gain, if this is true then the has to be the best exhaust design ever for the s197. I'll take one.
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Oct 21, 2007
#12
  • Oct 21, 2007
  • #12
JTGrant said:
To say that the brenspeed tune leaned out, I find that hard to beleive. I know that every car is different, but the tunes I received from Brenspeed and Bamachips were both on the rich side. I run a wideband and it is calibrated correctly (Lm1). A lot of times the dyno's calibration is off on their wideband. I had to lean out the tunes, I also had bamachips and brenspeed revise their tunes. Also I would think that without forced induction you would loose Hp and torque with a 3in system at lower to midrange RPM, given the displacement of our engines. 17HP from a mid-pipe on the Brenspeed tune is a huge gain, if this is true then the has to be the best exhaust design ever for the s197. I'll take one.
Click to expand...

I've had tunes from Brent and Doug both on both of our cars. On my '05, Doug's tunes were lean. On my '07, Doug's tunes were rich. In fact, at one point it dropped down to 9:1 and they stopped the dyno. Brent's tunes on both cars are dead on at 13:1, but that doesn't mean you couldn't run lean or rich with his tunes. They just happen to be perfect on our cars. It's VERY possible for one car to go lean with a tuner's tune, and another car to go rich.
 

blacksheep06

New Member
Jan 31, 2006
288
0
0
Oct 21, 2007
#13
  • Oct 21, 2007
  • #13
JTGrant said:
To say that the brenspeed tune leaned out, I find that hard to beleive. I know that every car is different, but the tunes I received from Brenspeed and Bamachips were both on the rich side. I run a wideband and it is calibrated correctly (Lm1). A lot of times the dyno's calibration is off on their wideband. I had to lean out the tunes, I also had bamachips and brenspeed revise their tunes. Also I would think that without forced induction you would loose Hp and torque with a 3in system at lower to midrange RPM, given the displacement of our engines. 17HP from a mid-pipe on the Brenspeed tune is a huge gain, if this is true then the has to be the best exhaust design ever for the s197. I'll take one.
Click to expand...

I agree. I'm not bashing but a 3" pipe would have to cause a drop in performance in the lower RPM's on a near stock 4.6. I'm not saying it wouldn't give a gain in the uppers but you will probably notice a little sluggishness in the lower rpm's.
 

stangdude2000

Founding Member
Jun 23, 2001
1,727
0
0
Northern VA
Oct 21, 2007
#14
  • Oct 21, 2007
  • #14
Kenaimone, are you saying the gain is from the axle back, the tune, or the combo of both? Or did you also add in a mid-pipe? I'm not doubting your gains by any means, but your story seems to be reworded each time you post, and I'm quite confused at to what you are claiming. I'm sure we'd all like to know exactly what you were running before and after.

Also, you are new to this board. Coming on and telling people their opinions suck is not a good way to make friends to to make yourself welcome here. Please use more diplomacy in the future when you disagree with someone. *EDIT* I stand corrected. You aren't that new by your join date, but with 25 posts, clearly you don't contribute often. Please show respect to everyone, new member or not.
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Oct 21, 2007
#15
  • Oct 21, 2007
  • #15
stangdude2000 said:
Kenaimone, are you saying the gain is from the axle back, the tune, or the combo of both? Or did you also add in a mid-pipe?
Click to expand...

The thread title was "22 hp off axle back" which is totaly misleading. Seems like good gains for the new mods however with 12 baseline then an additional 10 from tuning. I do agree that 3" maybe a bit large for the near stock engine. F/I will definitely love that size.
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Oct 21, 2007
#16
  • Oct 21, 2007
  • #16
I dunno guys!! I'm new to the s-197 but even a jump to a 3" mid pipe and axle back won't generate 22 REAR WHEEL HP!! Not on a stock application especially when there are tons of guys here that got around that much power using long tube headers, catless mid pipes etc....! Just going but what I've read on here. What he should've done is retune his flash tune first, sounds like he just made two regular pulls. I think the HP gain is from a more accurate re-tune on the dyno.
 

Leftoverchinese

Member
Apr 16, 2005
71
2
9
El Monte,CA
Oct 22, 2007
#17
  • Oct 22, 2007
  • #17
With the 322hp and 336tq your making with this exhaust combo you will no doubt be running low 12's. My slow little turd is only running 12.8's with a pathetic 293/306 power level. Keep us posted.
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Oct 22, 2007
#18
  • Oct 22, 2007
  • #18
Leftoverchinese said:
With the 322hp and 336tq your making with this exhaust combo you will no doubt be running low 12's. My slow little turd is only running 12.8's with a pathetic 293/306 power level. Keep us posted.
Click to expand...

Sad thing about the power levels mentioned above is that spyder7724 in his automatic and stock longblock with bolt ons is running 12.0s(I personaly saw him run a 12.15)with only 297 RWHP. That is one guy who's a very good racer and knows the tricks of the trade. These Stangs are 1 helluva fast car if prepped right and have favorable weather conditions.
 

Leftoverchinese

Member
Apr 16, 2005
71
2
9
El Monte,CA
Oct 22, 2007
#19
  • Oct 22, 2007
  • #19
kooldawg6 said:
Sad thing about the power levels mentioned above is that spyder7724 in his automatic and stock longblock with bolt ons is running 12.0s(I personaly saw him run a 12.15)with only 297 RWHP. That is one guy who's a very good racer and knows the tricks of the trade. These Stangs are 1 helluva fast car if prepped right and have favorable weather conditions.
Click to expand...


No doubt that guy is a master at the game. Unlike him though, im still running the stock torque converter and not a 3800 stall TCI unit. Im still a noob when it comes to modding my car and ill be the 1st to admit that, but ive seen many dyno sheets that seem to convey the fact that axel backs alone (like stated in the title of this thread) dont seem to put out the numbers we'd like. Which is why i kept my stock ones in place.
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Oct 23, 2007
#20
  • Oct 23, 2007
  • #20
leftover, when I ran my car back in the spring, I had the stock mufflers on with the O/R H, 4.10s, CAI and 93 octane tune and ran the 13.345. There is no doubt the stock mufflers perform well, just too quiet. I doubt the Flows would have gained me any time on the track.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Yesterday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
Foxtoberfest 2022
  • FastDriver
  • Sep 6, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2022
Ford Moore
F
R
89' Stang - MS2PNP - Post tune - Surging issues
  • rushcanuck
  • May 8, 2020
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
5
Views
2K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 9, 2020
a91what
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?