• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

245/50-17 Will it fit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GusinCA
  • Start date Start date Feb 18, 2006
G

GusinCA

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
170
1
18
Newport Beach
Feb 18, 2006
#1
  • Feb 18, 2006
  • #1
I know, odd question.
I'm trying to smooth out the ride a little on my 00 GT vert.
My guess is a tiny bit more sidewall will make a big difference, without hurting performance too much.
So would a 245/50-17 tire fit (stock suspension)? Am I correct in assuming this has the same contact patch, but a little taller sidewall?

Thanks.
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Feb 18, 2006
#2
  • Feb 18, 2006
  • #2
just a bigger sidewall, check out a tire size calc(google that phrase) and it will show you the difference in different aspect ratios on tires
 
G

GusinCA

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
170
1
18
Newport Beach
Feb 18, 2006
#3
  • Feb 18, 2006
  • #3
Do you think there will be any rubbing/clearance problems?
I assume no, since people put much bigger wheels on lowered cars, and mine is stock, but you guys know way more about this stuff...
 
G

GusinCA

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
170
1
18
Newport Beach
Feb 18, 2006
#4
  • Feb 18, 2006
  • #4
So I went to a tire calc site, and this is what it came up with:
The total diameter goes up about 1 inch.
This can't be a big deal, right?
It also states that the speedo will be 3.8% off.
So I'm assuming the car will also accelerate 4% slower, but have 4% better mileage?
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Feb 18, 2006
#5
  • Feb 18, 2006
  • #5
i dont think the acceleration and mpg will be so linear. it shouldnt do anything but what you said, there is a crapload of clearance in the wheel wells. people run 28" tall tires on these cars problem free
 
0

'03GTinFLA

Member
May 29, 2004
486
0
17
St. Petersburg, FL
Feb 18, 2006
#6
  • Feb 18, 2006
  • #6
I think you should do it and then write a review and take pictures. I've thought about doing this before, but never got beyond the thought.
 

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Feb 18, 2006
#7
  • Feb 18, 2006
  • #7
Biggist contributer to our harsh ride on Mustang is shock/spring. when I had my stock spring/shock, it rode like F250. then I replaced with sportline and Bilstein, and it ride 100% better.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,236
17,922
224
Massachusetts
Feb 18, 2006
#8
  • Feb 18, 2006
  • #8
GusinCA said:
So I went to a tire calc site, and this is what it came up with:
The total diameter goes up about 1 inch.
This can't be a big deal, right?
It also states that the speedo will be 3.8% off.
So I'm assuming the car will also accelerate 4% slower, but have 4% better mileage?
Click to expand...


Doesn't work like that.

You are right, the acceleration will be slower, but your gas milage will be worse if anything due to spinning larger tires. It takes more energy.

You will gail milage on the highway though once at speed. Less RPM to go 65MPH. That's about the only benefit really.

Don't expect much of a difference in ride quality though. Invest the money into a quality shock like a bilstien. Something adjustable will help out greatly.
 

ponysarepretty

New Member
Jul 25, 2005
578
0
0
Feb 18, 2006
#9
  • Feb 18, 2006
  • #9
Our tires are not what I would call "low" profile, by any means, a lot of cars that are a lot less harsh have less sidewall. The main problem is the shocks and springs.
 
G

GusinCA

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
170
1
18
Newport Beach
Feb 18, 2006
#10
  • Feb 18, 2006
  • #10
Yep, this is one of several mods I am planning in the next few months.
#1 - Full length crossmembers under the car.
#2 - shock tower brace.
#3 - tokico 5-way adjustable shocks
#4 - tires
#5 - IRS (maybe)...

I don't want to lower the car. Any springs out there better than stock which don't lower the car?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Seemingly random 'will it fit' and 'how well does it work' kinds of questions...
  • JasonRP
  • Jul 3, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 14, 2021
2000xp8
Progress Thread Project 2nd Chance Pony - Status Update
  • JKWilson61
  • Dec 14, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2020
JKWilson61
K
Project Ideas (2006 S197)
  • Kitsune187
  • Apr 22, 2019
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2019
Kitsune187
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?