• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

289 engine build

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1fstpony
  • Start date Start date Feb 10, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

1fstpony

Member
Apr 12, 2005
76
0
6
Iowa
Feb 10, 2007
#1
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #1
What do you guys think is the best engine build is for a 289.I am rebuilding my 289 but want to upgrade the performance but not to crazy. I want to be around 300 hp. Not wanting to spend a ton of money either.Is there a engine kit that would get me around there.Please give me some ideas.Thanks
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 10, 2007
#2
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #2
there is a pretty simple recipe for 300 horse. This includes nice aluminum heads, better intake (RPM, Stealth, etc.), and a matching cam. Along as you have the other compliments such as a properly tuned carb, headers, etc. That should get you to 300 horse. As far as money is concerned, horsepower costs money so you'll need to spend some of it. Typically aluminum heads run 1000, intake 175, cam 200 (all rough estimates). Not to mention all of the little stuff such as gaskets, rocker arms, pushrods, etc. I'm not trying to discourage you just be realistic going in. Builds usually cost more than expected. Ask me how I know! Also, what are your goals (drag, street/strip, autocross, sreet) for the car. That will help the guys when making parts recommendations. Also, tell us if it's a stick or auto, whether it has gears, all the good info. All together 300 hp isn't too difficult, just takes the right planned out approach.
 

1fstpony

Member
Apr 12, 2005
76
0
6
Iowa
Feb 10, 2007
#3
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #3
Is there a way without having to get aluminum heads?Is there a cast iron head that gives you a good flow and power increase?And this will be going into a automatic.Thanks
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 10, 2007
#4
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #4
sure, there are world jrs/roush 180's. Usually the base aluminum heads are out flowing these, but that's design not material. Oh yeah RHS has a set of 180cc. If you don't mind me asking, why do you not want aluminum heads? If it's cash, don't let that sway you. I decided to go cheap and have iron heads ported/polished/milled and now I wish I would have gone aluminum. Once again the difference is not based in the material, just usually the design (typically, not always though).
 

1fstpony

Member
Apr 12, 2005
76
0
6
Iowa
Feb 10, 2007
#5
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #5
How much more power do you really gain between the two, is it worth the 3 or 400 more dollars?
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 10, 2007
#6
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #6
it all depends who you talk to LOL. If I could do it all over I would just went ahead and got aluminums. Typically the aforementioned iron heads need work to flow the same as say afrs or twisted wedge heads. Typically you can run more timing/compression with aluminums. Also, with the less flow offered by the roush/world heads you need to run a bigger cam to make the same horsepower. Also remember that these are generalizations at this point. I'm trying to point you in the right direction. Another thing to remember is that the key, at least to me, to making horsepower with a small block ford is in a good cylinder head. Just me though.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Feb 10, 2007
#7
  • Feb 10, 2007
  • #7
I think you could get 300hp with a basically stock motor, something like a Comp Cams 268H cam, a good intake, with a 600cfm vacuum-secondary carb and tri-Y headers. I don't know what your budget is, but that's a low-dollar combo that will perform well, give you great mileage and be dead reliable.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 11, 2007
#8
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #8
zookeeper said:
I think you could get 300hp with a basically stock motor, something like a Comp Cams 268H cam, a good intake, with a 600cfm vacuum-secondary carb and tri-Y headers. I don't know what your budget is, but that's a low-dollar combo that will perform well, give you great mileage and be dead reliable.
Click to expand...

heads or head work will probably still be needed.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 11, 2007
#9
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #9
Do what Zookeper suggested. He's dead on. The 289 Hi-po's Shelby used had nothing other than an intake and exhaust upgrade and these were "rated" at 306 at the flywheel. Bolt on a Ford Racing A321 intake (this is basically a repop of the Shelby intake) Holley 600 carb, Tri-Y headers, upgrade the cam per Zookeeper's suggestion, and open the exhaust ports on the heads then blend down into the bowls. Do this on the sides and roof, leave the floor as is. Port match the intake sides. Smooth off any rough surfaces in the chambers. If you want to spend more and go with a bigger cam, upgrade to screw in studs and guide plates. Going the aluminum head route will run you $1500 once you factor in a set of roller rockers and new pushrods. Less if you shop around.
 

1fstpony

Member
Apr 12, 2005
76
0
6
Iowa
Feb 11, 2007
#10
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #10
Is that H cam very radical.I don't want a real lopy cam.I had a 93 mustang that had an Ford motorsports E cam and that was perfect.Is the H close to that?Thanks
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Feb 11, 2007
#11
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #11
No, the 268H is a very mild cam, I have that in my car and it's great for the street. It has a ton of low-end (for a 302) and even gets better mileage than stock. How much better could it get? BTW, don't get too hung up on numbers. Instead of saying you want 300hp, ask yourself what you want the car to do. My goal was to have my car perform as well as my '88GT with a 5.0, no better and no worse. I wanted streetability and reliability and the car will probably never see a racetrack so big numbers and high rpm's aren't what I need. If you set performance goals rather than random numbers, you'll be a lot happier.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 11, 2007
#12
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #12
are we talking flywheel horse power or rear wheel horse power? Because if we're talking rear wheel I still highly doubt he's getting there with stock heads. Oh course what do I know, I'm the young one of the group LOL
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 11, 2007
#13
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #13
Apparently you didn't comprehend what I posted before. Go back a reread it. I was very clear.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 11, 2007
#14
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #14
oh yeah LOL. I mean I have 10:1, stealth intake, between mild and wild cam, 600 cfm holley, long tubes, ported heads. That's good for probably 300 at the flywheel but not at the wheels right? I was just giving him my experience, for future growth I would just have gotten aluminum heads. sorry for the confusion D!
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 11, 2007
#15
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #15
Well the real issue here in doing iron factory heads and aluminum aftemarket is economics. To see which is more cost effective, depends on what it cost's to do what you want done with the iron heads. Start with bare junkyard cores, and you're right, it's probably better to go with aftermarket heads. If you're starting with a serviceable set of iron heads, doing what needs done could be less than $4-500 easily. When I did the overhaul on my 68 Merc, it turned out the heads only cost me $100 or so. These had 60K miles on them and all they really needed was new seals. I splurged for new springs. I've done a set of junkyard E7's for about $200. That was porting myself, plus the valve job and new springs. I've got $1500 in my Canfield heads. $1100 for the heads and another $275 for the roller rockers plus another $50 to mill them down to 57 ccs. They were supposed to be 58 cc heads but the actual ccs was 64. Back in the 80's I spent $700 to get a set of 428CJ heads back in shape, new seals, guides, seats, springs, retainers,etc.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 11, 2007
#16
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #16
And there's nothing wrong with a 300 flywheel horse 289/302, these I've learned are the most enjoyable to drive, for daily drivers. My 331 was fun in the Ranger, but I also enjoy the day to day reliablity of the 275 or so hp 5.0 that's there now. It's plenty fun with the Toploader 4 speed and 3.73 rear. In a 800 lb lighter car it'd be a blast too.
 

WantaGT

Member
Jul 13, 2003
336
0
16
ohio
Feb 11, 2007
#17
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #17
see that's why I was asking what his goals for the car were. I was just trying to get him in the right general direction. I'll bow to the experience and let you take over d!
 

Shakin66

Founding Member
Jan 19, 2001
628
1
19
Waycross, Ga / Lake James, NC
Feb 11, 2007
#18
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #18
Engine builders tip...

If you are going to be doing rocker arm adjustments DONT get the bright idea to prime up your oil before hand. If you do this the lifter's plunger doesnt relax which causes the valve spring to open instead. Anyone know how long it takes the lifters to relax or any tips to bleed them down so I can set move on? Its been 2 hours and I really want the car running tonight....
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 11, 2007
#19
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #19
Lifter pump up shouldn't be an issue. Unless you've got anti pump up aftermarket lifters or something. I've bolted down lots of non adjustable rockers with hydraulic lifters and they were fine. Even with the Crane rollers in my 331, there were no issues after adjusting them with the lifters full of oil.
 

Shakin66

Founding Member
Jan 19, 2001
628
1
19
Waycross, Ga / Lake James, NC
Feb 11, 2007
#20
  • Feb 11, 2007
  • #20
Im sorry I thought I was doing a new post on that...Its been two hours and it they are rock hard. I'm checking P2V clearance with these new Dart heads so I guess I will move on to another cylinder and see if its locked down.
They are lifters that came from Anderson Motorsports so they may be anti pump ups....Great, Its my one day off and I cant move forward.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Help Me Build a 289
  • 66Stang1
  • Sep 18, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
312
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Sep 18, 2025
Noobz347
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
845
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
581
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
F
289 to 302 Engine
  • Fri Guy
  • Feb 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
632
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2025
Fri Guy
F
SBF rebuild with no oil pressure NEED HELP
  • Falcon67
  • May 27, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
272
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 27, 2025
horse sence
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?