• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

289 improvement ideas

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cdaniel
  • Start date Start date Nov 17, 2018

Cdaniel

Founding Member
Nov 29, 2001
220
0
16
Arizona
Nov 17, 2018
#1
  • Nov 17, 2018
  • #1
What I have: 289 C code with about 40k on a stock rebuild that was bored .030 over.

What I'm thinking about doing:
Basically a 4V carb and dual exhaust keeping the stock appearance, heads and exhaust manifolds. Possibly add headers, but doubt the heads will flow to make it worthwhile.

Worth the trouble for a little extra power?
Are the stock 2V heads a restriction for a 4V?
Is there a mild cam improvement worth doing?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Nov 18, 2018
#2
  • Nov 18, 2018
  • #2
the stock heads an handle a decent amount of power, though at some point they do become a restriction. that said a 4V carb upgrade, use the performer rpm or weiand stealth intake manifold and a 600 cfm carb, i prefer the edelbrock 1406, but there are a number of good carbs out there to use.

dual exhaust is great, add a set of tri-y headers to round out the exhaust, they are designed to operate in the mid ranges and will add power to the engine.

for a cam upgrade, look at cams that operate in the 1000-5000 rpm range. that is where your engine will operate about 80% of the time.

remember shelby used the stock heads on the GT-350s, even the race cars, though he did port them for racing, and the shelbys dominated their class in SCCA racing, sometimes even beating A production cobras. so since oyu are not going to make around 400hp, your stock heads will do just fine.
 
Reactions: Cdaniel

Cdaniel

Founding Member
Nov 29, 2001
220
0
16
Arizona
Nov 18, 2018
#3
  • Nov 18, 2018
  • #3
Thanks. I've been looking at the edelbrock carb intake package deals. Seems like a good way to go. Maybe add their cam as well. This engine has never been very smooth at idle since new and I've always suspected the generic stock cam might be at fault. I just finished a compression check and all is good internally.

Any experience with tri-y header install and fit? Pain in the keester?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Nov 18, 2018
#4
  • Nov 18, 2018
  • #4
i havent put my tri-ys in yet, but i think they will fit better than the 4-1 tubes i had in the car, and they fit pretty well. as for your not so smooth idle, you might have a vacuum leak in the stock engine, rather common issue as the intake gets a bit loose over time. i have had that happen a few times over the years. it stopped when i went with fords suggestion of torquing the intake to 30ft/lbs, and changing the pattern i used to torque the intake down, starting with the four corners in a criss cross pattern, then using the stock ford pattern to torque the intake down. that prevents the inner bolts from loosening up when the outer bots get torqued down.
 

Cdaniel

Founding Member
Nov 29, 2001
220
0
16
Arizona
Dec 8, 2018
#5
  • Dec 8, 2018
  • #5
Comp cams selector sodftware recommends their 252H. Anyone with opinions/experience with it in this scenario?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Dec 9, 2018
#6
  • Dec 9, 2018
  • #6
the cam manufacturers tend to be conservative when recommending cams, personally i would go with either the 260h or the 268h grind. i think for your application the 260h would do you just fine. the 252h is perhaps a tiny bit better than stock.
 

Cdaniel

Founding Member
Nov 29, 2001
220
0
16
Arizona
Dec 9, 2018
#7
  • Dec 9, 2018
  • #7
Thanks. I have a 260h comp cam in an SBC stroker for a 4x4 rock crawler with efi and it's great for that.

For the mustang it's just needs a little wake up, but I want to maintain a civilized idle.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Dec 10, 2018
#8
  • Dec 10, 2018
  • #8
then the 260h cam is for you. the 268h idle tends to be a bit lumpy, but then it was designed that way, and still give good mid range power.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
949
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
615
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
WTB/Trade Looking for a T-Top Hatch. Possible convertible trade? (Rhode Island)
  • 7upper
  • Mar 18, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
331
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Mar 18, 2025
7upper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?