• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

3.05 with kenne bell 1.7?

  • Thread starter Thread starter what9612
  • Start date Start date Feb 19, 2008

what9612

Member
Apr 11, 2005
43
0
7
Warren, MI
Feb 19, 2008
#1
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #1
i had 4.10s installed in my automatic last summer. right now my car is at the shop for my kb 1.7 install, and they said they didnt want me to have to pay for a gear again, so they r gonna install a 3.05 from a 93 cobra or something. what do u think of a 3.05..... its going backward from stock even with more power will i be fine?
 

BennyBlown2v

New Member
Dec 9, 2004
1,233
1
0
Carmel, INdiana
Feb 19, 2008
#2
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #2
They had 3.08 gears that year. I think stock gears for your car (3.27) would be fine, or 3.55's.
 
R

rugster

New Member
Aug 31, 2004
156
0
0
Feb 19, 2008
#3
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #3
3.08 seems a bit low to me
 

what9612

Member
Apr 11, 2005
43
0
7
Warren, MI
Feb 19, 2008
#4
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #4
we were going to put them back to stock, but since he had that gear layin around he was jus gonna stick that in there and not charge me for it. then if i dont like it then bring it back...... jus go with it or have something different to start with?
 

blkhorse

Founding Member
Oct 30, 1999
345
1
18
Feb 19, 2008
#5
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #5
you won't be happy with the 3:08's.get 3:73's or just leave the 4:10's in for now.
 

four six

Member
Jan 19, 2006
506
2
18
Hobart, IN
Feb 19, 2008
#6
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #6
3:55
 
J

jprovence

New Member
May 20, 2007
195
0
0
Albany, OR
Feb 19, 2008
#7
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #7
Just imagine your top speed in 4th gear. That thing would be a roll racing king.
 

DCjuggalo

Member
May 18, 2003
169
0
16
Charlotte, NC
Feb 19, 2008
#8
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #8
four six said:
3:55
Click to expand...

i concur
 

ErikTheBeast

Member
Apr 12, 2006
124
0
16
Kansas City MO
Feb 19, 2008
#9
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #9
Id keep the gears you got man
 

MyBloodRunsBlue

New Member
Feb 1, 2007
127
0
0
Feb 19, 2008
#10
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #10
i have 4.10s w/ my vortech and i couldn't be happier...it's still pretty good up top too
 

jivepepper

Founding Member
Jun 19, 2002
776
5
18
Under a Sombrero. in WV.
Feb 19, 2008
#11
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #11
Are you sure he didn't say 3.55's?

MyBloodRunsBlue said:
i have 4.10s w/ my vortech and i couldn't be happier...it's still pretty good up top too
Click to expand...

I'm almost at the end on 3.73's now in the 1/4 at 6400 rpms. I've hit the rev limiter a couple time just after the traps. It depends on how much power he plans on putting down.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Feb 19, 2008
#12
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #12
no more than 3.55's if you want any traction
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Feb 19, 2008
#13
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #13
3.27's would be the lowest.

You could probaly hit mach-1 in 5th gear with 3.08's, hahaha.
 
J

justinschmidt1

Member
Jun 15, 2005
349
0
16
Feb 19, 2008
#14
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #14
BurningRubber said:
3.27's would be the lowest.

You could probaly hit mach-1 in 5th gear with 3.08's, hahaha.
Click to expand...

I loved the 3.08s in my stock 96..I could do massive first gear burnouts

with the auto I swear I was almost touchin 100 in second.


it felt like it would pull forever in first and second though..I kinda liked it.

Would the car really be any slower with 3.08s than 3.27s or 3.55s?

the kennebelles make so much damn torque down low..I just dont see how 3.08s gonna make it feel slow.

I was lightin em up at 30-40 mph in my npi in first gear...( I did have some real bad tires, but still)
 

kj99

Founding Member
Sep 2, 1999
346
0
0
Spartanburg SC
Feb 20, 2008
#15
  • Feb 20, 2008
  • #15
I would also say leave your 4:10s in untill you get some 3:73s later on.



I have had my 4:10s with my KB for almost a year now and I still love them.

No traction issues since I put on M/T DR..
 

what9612

Member
Apr 11, 2005
43
0
7
Warren, MI
Feb 20, 2008
#16
  • Feb 20, 2008
  • #16
well i called there earlier and........... he was saying THREE FIVE as in 3.55 not 3.05. I was so relieved when i heard that. But he did also tell me my posi is messed up and i need a new one. Does that sound right for only 27k miles. I did notice some one wheel burnouts tho.
 

jivepepper

Founding Member
Jun 19, 2002
776
5
18
Under a Sombrero. in WV.
Feb 20, 2008
#17
  • Feb 20, 2008
  • #17
what9612 said:
well i called there earlier and........... he was saying THREE FIVE as in 3.55 not 3.05. I was so relieved when i heard that. But he did also tell me my posi is messed up and i need a new one. Does that sound right for only 27k miles. I did notice some one wheel burnouts tho.
Click to expand...

Thats cool. You don't need a new one just reclutch the old diff.
 
0

'03GTinFLA

Member
May 29, 2004
486
0
17
St. Petersburg, FL
Feb 20, 2008
#18
  • Feb 20, 2008
  • #18
I would try those 3.55's. Especially since your getting a deal. I have 3:73's and first gear is a joke, 2nd can spin the whole way and 3rd is that scratching type traction the whole way. The good part is that it made me a better driver with working the throttle. Otherwise it's just a smokeshow while the other person drives away.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rear diff rebuild opinions
  • MrPerfect2
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
202
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2025
AeroCoupe
R
Kenne Bell Supporting Mods for 2002 GT?
  • Rembrant
  • Mar 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
673
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 25, 2025
Noobz347
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
329
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
Progress Thread 93 LX father son project
  • ZAM93LX
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 3, 2025
Scrapla347
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
384
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?