• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech

3.55 or 3.73 gears?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dfink114
  • Start date Start date Jan 18, 2013

Dfink114

New Member
Jan 18, 2013
3
0
2
Jan 18, 2013
#1
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #1
Hi All,

I'm changing out my 2.73 gears and can't decide between 3.55 and 3.73. I work in the inner city so there's a lot of stop and go, and this car will never see the track. Is the 3.55 worth the extra mpg vs the extra pull I'd get from the 3.73s?

Thanks

P.S. I drive stick
 

earleys94gt

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
1,223
16
49
Ashley, Ohio
Jan 18, 2013
#2
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #2
You, in theory, might get slightly better mileage in town with the 3.73's as it would require less "effort" to get the car moving.

Between the two, the difference, at freeway speed, is only a few hundred RPM. Which the six-speed will help with.
 

Coyote5.0

5 Year Member
Aug 27, 2010
625
102
64
Portage, Wisconsin
Jan 18, 2013
#3
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #3
If you were doing a lot of highway driving, the gears would affect fuel economy more. If you are just going to be driving slow in stop and go city traffic, changing the rear-end gear probably won't have much of any affect, since you're not in high gear in the city, so you'll probably just end up shifting the transmission into a higher gear at a lower speed. If your driving conditions and speeds are just right, being able to upshift a little earlier could slightly improve fuel economy.
 

thd245

Member
Nov 11, 2012
48
1
9
Jan 18, 2013
#4
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #4
3.73! the previous posts are right. Since you are in stop and go city traffic, you probably will not be running in 6th gear much, and that is where, as far as mpg difference is. 3.55 will be able to run lower rpms in 6th. You will appreciate the power difference from the 3.73. But only go with 3.73 not 4.10s, I personally think 4.10s are on the torquey side for street cars, but every driver is different
 

Clair Smith

Active Member
Apr 4, 2012
186
13
29
Norfolk Va
Jan 19, 2013
#5
  • Jan 19, 2013
  • #5
I love the 3.73 in my car. I was fortunate enough to drive a Mustang with 3.31, 3.55, and 3.73. For performance, the 3.73 give much better response.
 

Sparty92

Member
Jul 30, 2007
430
5
19
Detroit Burbs
Mar 9, 2013
#6
  • Mar 9, 2013
  • #6
I had 3.55s in my '07, and now have 3.73s in my '11. For city driving, the 3.73s are way more fun! If you don't have a good tire in the back, you will have traction issues if your right foot is a bit heavy. I can spin the tires in 1st with just hard, roll-on acceleration.

Regarding highway mileage, I have found this to be true for me:

'07 GT, 3.55, 5-speed stick, 70mph, 2,250 rpm = close to, if not...30 mpg. Strange, I know.
'11 GT, 3.75, 6-speed stick, 70mph, 2,250 rpm = at best, 22 mpg, MAYBE 24...but it took forever to register.

I have no idea why the huge difference in MPG if both cars turned the same rpm on the highway. Both had K&N drop-in air filters. Stock tires. Windows up, AC on or off.

If you like to DRIVE, you'll have much more fun with 3.73s. The rpms are not crazy at all on the highway (2,250 at 70 in 6th). Around town I drive my car like a 5-speed and with my VERY short commute of under 3 miles one way, I get between 11.5-12.5 mpg. That's not driving like a crazy person either. Half the commute is 35mph or less. If I use 6th gear around town (pfthhh), I loaf along around 1,200-1,500 rpm and can see 15mpg or so.

I just read that you have a V6, so ignore my MPGs totally.

Hope that helps.
 

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
Mar 10, 2013
#7
  • Mar 10, 2013
  • #7
3.73s. You won't see much difference in mileage, but will be happier with performance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
514
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jun 28, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
290
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
554
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
420
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?