• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

3.73s and 4.11s

  • Thread starter Thread starter '02~'vert~GT
  • Start date Start date Nov 10, 2003
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4

crew_dawg16

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
445
0
0
DeKalb, IL
Sep 8, 2004
#61
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #61
danrat said:
That’s cause you lack the experience that I have had with this exact matter. It's been the case every time someone I know has 4.10's. I will race you on the street when I know your tires are getting low and bet the farm you will squirrel your way off the line. Knowing how to drive is just as bad because when you don’t have traction all you can do is granny it off the line and feather the clutch as I take a 3-4 car lead on you. With 3.73's I can dump the clutch on you with fair tires and still hang on.
Click to expand...

You obviously don't have that much experience with driving. Just because the person you are racing can't drive doesn't make your 3.73s better.

sixstringthing, don't listen to this joker talking about wheelspin. I just got my 4.10s installed last friday and couldn't be happier with them. I don't have any problem not spinning my tires. You just need to adjust your driving habits to the new gears. You do a lot more shifting, but you will get BETTER mileage in the city and stop 'n go traffic with a VERY minor loss in highway mpg. Just go for the 4.10s and you will be happy with them, it only raised my highway rpms by 400-500.

Oh, and danrat, I'd give bill a set of tires with steel cords hanging out and his 4.30s vs. you and your 3.73s with a set of DRs and my money would be on bill. He is by far one of the best drivers around and you pale in comparison.
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Sep 9, 2004
#62
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #62
danrat said:
3.73's are the best bet in a GT if you want to remain fast through the tires life.

You must have deep pockets. My friends have the gear and they drive great. However, keeping your tires is the plan here. If your tires are getting slick after a few miles I will beat you every time with your 4.10's. I will take 3.73's with partially worn tires and beat the exact same car with 4.10's with the same situation time after time. Its a fact here. With new tires you're on top of the world, but the truth is the day your ties suck you better run down and buy a new pair cause you will sit at the line and either granny it or hit the gas like a freak and loose it. So it really depends on your budget, but if you get caught at the wrong stage in your tires life you're going to get your ass handed to you by a lesser vehicle.

My old GT with 3.73's got my buddies Mach 1 with 4.30's when he first got the gears and his tires were fair. He got tires and I got beat that following week. He had more HP and gear but couldn’t get off the line. This guy pulls mid 12's in his Mach now and his reaction times are close to perfect.

Experience tells the story.
Click to expand...
you think you are going to pull 1.8s on street tires???you better if you think you are going to get me out of the hole. i know i was pulling low 1.9s on my squirrelly sumitomos that were at the wear bars

why don't you stfu until you give us at least a nut hairs worth of proof of your "experience".
 

crew_dawg16

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
445
0
0
DeKalb, IL
Sep 9, 2004
#63
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #63
Jackie Chan said:
you think you are going to pull 1.8s on street tires???you better if you think you are going to get me out of the hole. i know i was pulling low 1.9s on my squirrelly sumitomos that were at the wear bars

why don't you stfu until you give us at least a nut hairs worth of proof of your "experience".
Click to expand...

 

Mstng2

Founding Member
Jun 27, 2002
789
5
19
- - Zion - -
Sep 9, 2004
#64
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #64
Crewdawg, was your 14.89 ET with your 4:10's? Seems a bit on the high side for 4:10's. Just curious cause I ran a 14.7 with 3:73's and Auto Trans at 3000 ft elevation. 2000 GT w/ Stock engine, stock exhaust, K&N filter.
 

boomshack

New Member
Jun 4, 2004
274
0
0
Southern Cali
Sep 9, 2004
#65
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #65
So am I driving a bit agressively if I'm tacking 4 grand at 80mph in 4th? I was in an accident a few months back that destroyed the differential so the body shop sent it to get rebuilt...and now it howls a bit on the rear passenger side...sorry for highjacking this thread and selfishly asking for help in MY situation
 

crew_dawg16

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
445
0
0
DeKalb, IL
Sep 9, 2004
#66
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #66
Mstng2 said:
Crewdawg, was your 14.89 ET with your 4:10's? Seems a bit on the high side for 4:10's. Just curious cause I ran a 14.7 with 3:73's and Auto Trans at 3000 ft elevation. 2000 GT w/ Stock engine, stock exhaust, K&N filter.
Click to expand...
No, my times were not with 4.10s. I am going back to the track on the 18th and we will see the difference. I also ran at 3600ft altitude which corrects to a 14.17 at sea level.
 

Mustang92

SN's #1 1%er
Jun 6, 2001
6,467
2
79
South Florida
Sep 17, 2004
#67
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #67
danrat said:
3.73's are the best bet in a GT if you want to remain fast through the tires life.
Click to expand...

Again learn how to drive and wearing down tires won't be an issue. Only little kids go around burning up their tires to impress their friends. I didn't wear down my tires any faster with 4.30's than I did with the stock 3.27's.

Bill
 

GTsleeper

New Member
Nov 26, 2003
179
0
0
St.Louis, Missouri
Sep 17, 2004
#68
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #68
Mustang92 said:
Again learn how to drive and wearing down tires won't be an issue. Only little kids go around burning up their tires to impress their friends. I didn't wear down my tires any faster with 4.30's than I did with the stock 3.27's.

Bill
Click to expand...
I wouldn't say burning tires is just for little kids sometimes its a blast to put on your stock tires and rip them up. Not too impress anyone just to have fun in an open parking lot. Practice powerslides and so forth, but too each his own. Just remember when its time to line up learn what you got and drive it.
 

tygr1

New Member
Jun 16, 2004
318
0
0
SoCal
Sep 17, 2004
#69
  • Sep 17, 2004
  • #69
"I am going with 4.10's. I have 245/40-20 though so that would be about the eqivelant of 3.90. if you do what they tell you and drive at higher rpm you will notice your car runs quieter and has power at that rpm that is nice. does anyone know at what cruise rpm you milage starts to drop off?"





..JK

Yeah, about 1500-1800 unfortunately, haha. Hell, off idle, your mileage starts to go away.

I have 3:73s in my 98 Cobra and I get 17 (mostly city, hard runs) to 22+ (mostly highway and conservative city). So a 2V should be even better...enough better that, if you want a more FUN car, I, too, would go with the 4:10s or 4:30s.
 
B

big T

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
265
0
0
Hawaii, oahu
Sep 18, 2004
#70
  • Sep 18, 2004
  • #70
Well, 4:10' or 3:73's!!! Let me ask this, If u put drag radials on equally modded cars with equal drivers who would win a 1/4 race? The 4:10 driver would cause he/she wold get out a bit quicker!
 

crew_dawg16

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
445
0
0
DeKalb, IL
Sep 19, 2004
#71
  • Sep 19, 2004
  • #71
well, there are my new times on the left. The 4.10s knocked off about .3 on my quarter times. Much of that came from the 60ft. I lost .2 off of them.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
I have some 4.6 questions.
  • whiskerz
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
283
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2025
squeak93
Engine (EGR Deleted) Solution the hotter combustion chambers?
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
97
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 2, 2026
PonyGTrider
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
722
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
U
No fuel pump relay in harness
  • Uli661
  • May 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
150
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
Uli661
U
J
Rear alignment issues
  • Jayjay001
  • May 27, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
1
Views
86
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk May 27, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?