• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Exhaust 3 Inch Exhaust

  • Thread starter Thread starter GoldenEagle91
  • Start date Start date Mar 8, 2015
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

GoldenEagle91

Active Member
Dec 25, 2012
240
16
29
Mar 8, 2015
#1
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #1
Hi guys,

I am in the early stages of planning for the exhaust that I would like to do on my 306 when I finally get it installed and I wanted to know if anyone had any experience or input on the matter of going with a 3 inch exhaust all the way out. My plan was to pick up summit racing headers ( http://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-g9030/overview/make/ford ), their 3 inch exhaust pipe kit ( http://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-670147 ), and Flowmaster super 44 mufflers ( http://www.summitracing.com/parts/flo-943045/overview/ ). The car will be a weekend driver for the mean time and I plan to eventually do some drag racing with it so noise isn't a real concern. Please let me know if you have any experience with doing a similar setup or if you know of anyone who has done it and their results.

Thanks,
Andrew
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Mar 8, 2015
#2
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #2
No expierience with those parts. Just a fwiw a 2 1/2" exhaust is more than enough for 450-500hp. Also 3" tails can be a problem with most cars. They tend to hit on the fuel tank and/or suspension parts.
 
Reactions: f8tlfiveo

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Mar 8, 2015
#3
  • Mar 8, 2015
  • #3
I went from 1-3/4" equal length shortys and a full 2-1/2" Flowmaster system, to 1-3/4" long tubes with 3" spintechs and 3" straight pipes. This was on my 302. I didn't notice anything substantial. But it's a daily driver. Biggest difference was no drone.

I've got the same 3" system on my 347 now.
 

f8tlfiveo

My wife likes my spool and blow-off valve.
Aug 8, 2007
1,585
102
64
Lancaster, PA
Mar 10, 2015
#4
  • Mar 10, 2015
  • #4
I think you stick with 2.5.... I think 3" looks ricer unless you have the motor to back it up.. Plus like previously stated 2.5" is plenty big


Sent from my iPhone
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,216
17,899
224
Massachusetts
Mar 10, 2015
#5
  • Mar 10, 2015
  • #5
Horsepower goals??

2.5" is enough for most daily driver type cars with modest power. Anything more and you run into issues with pipe clearances and banging on the gas tank.
 

GoldenEagle91

Active Member
Dec 25, 2012
240
16
29
Mar 10, 2015
#6
  • Mar 10, 2015
  • #6
Thank you all for your input. I guess I was just aiming to have the best flow possible and that is why I was planning on 3". I am hoping to break into at least 400 at the flywheel but I guess we will see. It sounds as though 2.5" will be plenty for what my goals are though from what most of you guys have stated. I was a little bit nervous about potential clearance issues near the gas tank as many of you have stated. I suppose its going to be 2.5" after all cause 3" doesn't sound like it would benefit me enough to warrant the extra money for the exhaust pipe.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Mar 14, 2015
#7
  • Mar 14, 2015
  • #7
A5literMan said:
No expierience with those parts. Just a fwiw a 2 1/2" exhaust is more than enough for 450-500hp. Also 3" tails can be a problem with most cars. They tend to hit on the fuel tank and/or suspension parts.
Click to expand...


actually 3" tailpipes give a bit more clearance due to the routing. They go under the front corners of the fuel tank as opposed to around them like 2.5" pipes do
 
Reactions: A5literMan

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Mar 14, 2015
#8
  • Mar 14, 2015
  • #8
Mustang5L5 said:
Horsepower goals??

2.5" is enough for most daily driver type cars with modest power. Anything more and you run into issues with pipe clearances and banging on the gas tank.
Click to expand...

2.5" duals are plenty for much more displacement than 302 cu in.
The Dronemasters will flow plenty with plenty of noise. Unless you are going to big block displacement or a lot of turbo, you will be fine. Too big of pipe can even cost torque from flow velocity issues. Save the weight, and make sure you have a cross over pipe, X or H.
 
Reactions: 89oem

GoldenEagle91

Active Member
Dec 25, 2012
240
16
29
Mar 15, 2015
#9
  • Mar 15, 2015
  • #9
madspeed said:
actually 3" tailpipes give a bit more clearance due to the routing. They go under the front corners of the fuel tank as opposed to around them like 2.5" pipes do
Click to expand...

I guess it would be cool to see an undercarriage shot of the routing for a 3 inch exhaust setup to get a better idea of how it would have to be set up.

7991LXnSHO said:
2.5" duals are plenty for much more displacement than 302 cu in.
The Dronemasters will flow plenty with plenty of noise. Unless you are going to big block displacement or a lot of turbo, you will be fine. Too big of pipe can even cost torque from flow velocity issues. Save the weight, and make sure you have a cross over pipe, X or H.
Click to expand...

I think upon further investigation that I am going to go with the slp lm1's again. I had them on my other fox before it was stolen and they sounded pretty sweet through straight pipes. It really didnt drone at highway speed either which was nice cause like you said about the flowmasters, they tend to drone pretty bad. My dad has a super 44 muffler on his ram with a hemi and drone it does.
 

GoldenEagle91

Active Member
Dec 25, 2012
240
16
29
Mar 15, 2015
#10
  • Mar 15, 2015
  • #10
does anyone have any experience with hedman hedders? They appear that they will have better flow than the summit units based on the photo from hedman's website. Standard Duty Uncoated Hedders .
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Mar 15, 2015
#11
  • Mar 15, 2015
  • #11
2.5 inch gives you a total of 5" in exhaust- more than enough to support 600hp. I think 3" is overkill and can actually hurt performance as it will have lower backpressure, reducing torque..
 

GoldenEagle91

Active Member
Dec 25, 2012
240
16
29
Mar 15, 2015
#12
  • Mar 15, 2015
  • #12
mikestang63 said:
2.5 inch gives you a total of 5" in exhaust- more than enough to support 600hp. I think 3" is overkill and can actually hurt performance as it will have lower backpressure, reducing torque..
Click to expand...

Is there some sort of information regarding how many inches needed for supporting a certain amount of horsepower somewhere? I'm curious just so I have a reference down the line. Thank you for the info!
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Mar 15, 2015
#13
  • Mar 15, 2015
  • #13
GoldenEagle91 said:
Is there some sort of information regarding how many inches needed for supporting a certain amount of horsepower somewhere? I'm curious just so I have a reference down the line. Thank you for the info!
Click to expand...

The complete performance exhaust system. An explanation on how to setup the exhaust system on your street rod.
 
Reactions: GoldenEagle91

GoldenEagle91

Active Member
Dec 25, 2012
240
16
29
Mar 15, 2015
#14
  • Mar 15, 2015
  • #14
mikestang63 said:
The complete performance exhaust system. An explanation on how to setup the exhaust system on your street rod.
Click to expand...

Great information my friend. Thank you
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Mar 16, 2015
#15
  • Mar 16, 2015
  • #15
mikestang63 said:
2.5 inch gives you a total of 5" in exhaust-..
Click to expand...

That's way off in terms of area. Dual 2.5's is no where close to 5".
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Mar 16, 2015
#16
  • Mar 16, 2015
  • #16
liljoe07 said:
That's way off in terms of area. Dual 2.5's is no where close to 5".
Click to expand...

really- tell me how I'm wrong. On a dual 2.5" ehaust system, how is that not 5" of total exhaust. I guess Flowmaster, Dynomax, and every other exhaust company is wrong as well.
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Mar 16, 2015
#17
  • Mar 16, 2015
  • #17
Compare the area of 2- 2.5" tubes vs one 5" tube. Its not even close.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Mar 16, 2015
#18
  • Mar 16, 2015
  • #18
I concur
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,775
6,932
214
SW Houston
Mar 17, 2015
#19
  • Mar 17, 2015
  • #19
I have 3" VRS tails. They do rattle in places. I recently got a few of them fixed, but it still hits on the UCA mount on the body and rattles sometimes. Excuse the dirt, it's been raining like crazy.

 
Reactions: GoldenEagle91

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Mar 17, 2015
#20
  • Mar 17, 2015
  • #20
3" exhaust will not have any noticable drawbacks in performance in a 400 hp application and it may be a smart idea to do the 3" now if you plan to make more power later. If you think there is any chance you will be using nitrous just do the 3" exhaust. There is no magical number where a 3" exhaust is needed. There are so many factors to this that it would be nearly impossible to test because one camshaft could have exhaust timing events that favor the bigger exhaust and one could favor the smaller exhaust.

Here is something to really consider though, and a reason i like the summit universal X-pipe. When you have a mid pipe, the merge section will actually add collector length to the headers. The placement of the X is very important and i believe that placing the X as far forward as possible will help the combination as a whole because when you have the x or h joint way back near the mufflers you have all kinds of collector length added for no reason. I think the exhaust pulses should be equalized ASAP. Also, the exhaust will sound much better with the X closer to the collector.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
424
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
736
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
379
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
P
Tailpipes for '88 GT
  • pindude80
  • Apr 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 13, 2025
pindude80
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?