• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

3 points or sub frames?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mhanksii
  • Start date Start date Mar 17, 2008

mhanksii

Member
Jan 3, 2006
336
0
16
Maryland
Mar 17, 2008
#1
  • Mar 17, 2008
  • #1
OK, my next add is going to be a chassis stiffener but I can't choose which way to go. What is everyones take on steeda 3 point torque boxes? Are they as good as sub-frame connectors on our cars or would sub frames still be a better option. I am not building an all out racer, in fact 90% of my cars life will be shooting from one stop light to the next.
 

Redfire 05

New Member
Apr 6, 2005
236
0
0
Lubbock, TX
Mar 17, 2008
#2
  • Mar 17, 2008
  • #2
At $10 more the BMR Boxed HD Subframe Connectors are both subframe connectors and torque box stiffeners (which is what the Steeda brace does).

A lot of people will say you don't need subframe connectors because the new cars are 30% stiffer than the older generation cars, and unless you plan on racing your car they are probably right. Having said that, I have full length subframe connectors on my Fox body stang and it is definately stiffer than my 05 stang. I plan on adding the BMR connectors in the future. Partly because I like the feel of the stiffer frame and partly because I do some auto crossing from time to time.
 

Redfire 05

New Member
Apr 6, 2005
236
0
0
Lubbock, TX
Mar 17, 2008
#3
  • Mar 17, 2008
  • #3
I guess I forgot an important point. The BMR piece must be welded on so unless you do it yourself that is an additional cost. Though BMR says it is not necessary to remove your carpet so it should be an easier job than on other cars.
 
O

o0Dan0o

Founding Member
Feb 8, 2001
485
1
0
Mar 18, 2008
#4
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #4
I would go with through floor subframe connectors:

The rectangular frame that the BMR connectors touch on are cut out and replaced with square tubing. After that, add torque boxes to help suspension mounting locations.
Dan
 

toxicpelican

New Member
Jan 30, 2006
9
0
0
Mar 19, 2008
#5
  • Mar 19, 2008
  • #5
I wouldn't worry about subframe connectors on the s197s, both Maximum Motorsports and Griggs state that they arn't necessary on this chassis. Spend your money elsewhere?
 

retfr8flyr

Member
Jun 24, 2006
154
13
19
Mar 19, 2008
#6
  • Mar 19, 2008
  • #6
I originally was going to install the Steeda braces but when I decided to go with more power I changed and have the BMR connectors. With the plans you state I think the Steeda pieces would be your best bet. If you decide to go Steeda let me know as I still have the pieces and will give you a good price.

Earl
 

Glenn88lx

Founding Member
Sep 15, 2002
328
0
0
Cocoa, Fl
Mar 20, 2008
#7
  • Mar 20, 2008
  • #7
Save your money, the only thing these chassis stiffeners do is improve the bottom line of the vendors and add unnecessary weight to an already heavy car. Furthermore, there is no way in hell a Fox with subframes is stiffer than an S197. I have owned and raced Foxes, SN95's and new edge Mustangs and the S197 has them all beat in chassis stiffness with or without subframes.

If you are going to race they are still a waste, a 6 point roll bar will do much more for chassis stiffness than a SFC ever thought about.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Mar 20, 2008
#8
  • Mar 20, 2008
  • #8
i recall reading that the S197 is stiffer that a fox with a full cage.

take it for what its worth...
 
S

SoCal89GT

New Member
Apr 11, 2006
75
0
0
Detroit, MI
Mar 21, 2008
#9
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #9
Glenn88lx said:
Save your money, the only thing these chassis stiffeners do is improve the bottom line of the vendors and add unnecessary weight to an already heavy car. Furthermore, there is no way in hell a Fox with subframes is stiffer than an S197. I have owned and raced Foxes, SN95's and new edge Mustangs and the S197 has them all beat in chassis stiffness with or without subframes.

If you are going to race they are still a waste, a 6 point roll bar will do much more for chassis stiffness than a SFC ever thought about.
Click to expand...

+1
The only way that I can see SFC's being worth their while on the S197's is if you are running ridiculous amounts of power and it is through a convertible. And even then, a mild cage will help more purely because of its location.
 
R

ruffy

Member
Apr 10, 2003
314
0
16
Skopje, Macedonia
Mar 23, 2008
#10
  • Mar 23, 2008
  • #10
I have the BMR boxed sub frames, although I have a crappy welding job they work pretty good and I have no complaints. Some people say they are not needed, but if it makes a stiff chassis stiffer then I'm good with it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust Exhaust and Sub Frame connectors
  • limp
  • Feb 25, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 2, 2024
limp
R
Kenne Bell Supporting Mods for 2002 GT?
  • Rembrant
  • Mar 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
704
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 25, 2025
Noobz347
Mid lenght sub frame connectors (straight)
  • Dontknowchit
  • Apr 13, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 14, 2024
bird_dog0347
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
801
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
J
Fox body - godzilla, coyote, or 408w stroker - Best route for budget build?
  • jaygee15
  • Jan 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2025
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?