• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

300 RWHP with stock heads and cam

  • Thread starter Thread starter 91notchbk
  • Start date Start date Nov 20, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Feb 9, 2007
#61
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #61
giddyup306 said:
Do you have any idea how much money it cost to port them out to that extreme?
Click to expand...

I don't, but if you PMd cleanLX, Mike might let you know what it cost.
 

PrimerdFury

New Member
Feb 26, 2003
139
0
0
Fountain Hills, Arizona
Oct 16, 2007
#62
  • Oct 16, 2007
  • #62
PrimerdFury said:
I dynoed 304rwhp/324rwtq with ported E7's, an e-cam and an edelbrock performer rpm manifold and no crazy tricks (smog pump bypassed).
Click to expand...
Well I posted this and forgot about it. Just ran across it today and figured I would answer some of the comments for anyone who cares.

tmoss said:
Tell us more about the head's specifics and flow (who did them too) and the cam.
I'd love to see the dyno curve if that is possible also. That is about the most I've seen claimed from a non-pro race engine.
Click to expand...

I have no flow numbers from the heads. They are E7s with 1.90/1.60 valves. A local engine shop named Basko worked on them. This is my daily driver, not a race car at all. The cam is just an E-303 installed straight up with 1.72 RRs. This is with a factory stock shortblock too. Hasn't even been rebuilt.



blackened88lx said:
/\ You should advise them to fix their dyno.
Click to expand...
I'll let the nice gentlemen at Arizona Dyno Chip know.

FullAuto said:
I'm thinking it's a carb motor.

I made 262rwhp 328rwtq with Thumpers, Performer RPM intake and a .545/.545 218/224 114 cam through an AOD. It still had a/c and the stock fan too.
Click to expand...

Mine isn't a carb motor. 24lb injectors and an Edelbrock Performer RPM manifold. It has an electric fan and A/C.
 

Attachments

  • DynoRun.webp
    50.4 KB · Views: 221

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Oct 16, 2007
#63
  • Oct 16, 2007
  • #63
That's one FAT torque curve..........

RPM I or RPM II?
 

PrimerdFury

New Member
Feb 26, 2003
139
0
0
Fountain Hills, Arizona
Oct 16, 2007
#64
  • Oct 16, 2007
  • #64
tmoss said:
That's one FAT torque curve..........

RPM I or RPM II?
Click to expand...

RPM I...I have been considering stepping up to a RPM II or Holley but I've been happy with where it is at...fat torque curve and all
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Oct 17, 2007
#65
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #65
I don't think I'd change that intake...............I doubt the heads flow more than the 230cfm that intake flows stock. Your not suffering from low end torque so why go to a longer runner?
 

iLkYsPoNy

if she's a tranny then... well I'd do her.... it..
Aug 8, 2006
60
0
6
Sandusky, Ohio ( Cedar Point - America's Rockin' R
Oct 17, 2007
#66
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #66
My personal experience is that a H/C/I would be best bet. I'm running the TFS Trackheat, Stage 2 cam, 75mm t-body, 90mm MAF (over kill), and 24lb injectors (under kill?) and I hit 310rwhp and 312ft lbs with a mild tune. Still very much streetable and a blast to drive.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Oct 17, 2007
#67
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #67
My combo is a 10:1 306 with original gt-40 irons that have been milled .020" and have a 3 angle valve job, explorer intake, steeda # 18 cam, 24 pounders, 65mm TB, 75mm MAF, LT's...blah blah blah

It put down 280/320 untuned. I havent had it dyno'd since i starting tuning with the tweecer. Dont know how much power it picked up (not a whole lot) but driveability is excellent. And i get 18 mpg driving country roads to work and 25+ on the highway!

I would say my combo is fairly close to the magical 300 rwhp and makes for a fun street car.
 

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Jun 5, 2008
#68
  • Jun 5, 2008
  • #68
PrimerdFury,
Nice looking graph.
You wouldn't be interested in posting your numeric sheet would you?

BTW, Keith's correction jobbie was not working when I went in, so I got uncorrected numbers... even corrected, my peak hp falls short of what you put down.

if I ever get mine out from under her blanket again, we'll have to run them(at the track), would be cool to have an E7 hot rod fest.
 
D

DRock9

New Member
Aug 22, 2006
359
0
0
Jun 5, 2008
#69
  • Jun 5, 2008
  • #69
Vortech SC-Trim!
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Jun 5, 2008
#70
  • Jun 5, 2008
  • #70
so wait . . . it went only 109 with 304rwhp and 324rwtq?

mine went 111-112 with 300rwhp and 312rwtq
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jun 6, 2008
#71
  • Jun 6, 2008
  • #71
peak numbers don't translate to track times - too much other stuff enters into the end result. Inlcuding total area under the HP curve, not just the peak. That's why the Engine Master's competition goes by a total of averages, not peaks.

I've got documentation of a 230RWHP Coupe runniing 12.7 @ 107mph.

cleanLX ran 12.9 with not much more than long tubes, exhaust and gears on his stock HO motor.
 

PrimerdFury

New Member
Feb 26, 2003
139
0
0
Fountain Hills, Arizona
Jun 6, 2008
#72
  • Jun 6, 2008
  • #72
cleanLX said:
PrimerdFury,
Nice looking graph.
You wouldn't be interested in posting your numeric sheet would you?

BTW, Keith's correction jobbie was not working when I went in, so I got uncorrected numbers... even corrected, my peak hp falls short of what you put down.

if I ever get mine out from under her blanket again, we'll have to run them(at the track), would be cool to have an E7 hot rod fest.
Click to expand...

Thanks man. I would be happy to post the numeric sheet, however the link I have for the dyno software (http://www.dynojet.com/downloads/software.php) doesn't seem to be working, so I will have to wait till I am at my home computer to post it. Hopefully I left the program on my computer and didn't delete it...

Well if you get yours out from under her blanket than I will do the same haha. It would be cool to run with another healthy E7 car, so seriously let me know the next time you make it out to the track.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jun 6, 2008
#73
  • Jun 6, 2008
  • #73
might this be the nudge you needed Mike?
 

PrimerdFury

New Member
Feb 26, 2003
139
0
0
Fountain Hills, Arizona
Jun 8, 2008
#74
  • Jun 8, 2008
  • #74
cleanLX said:
PrimerdFury,
Nice looking graph.
You wouldn't be interested in posting your numeric sheet would you?
Click to expand...

Here ya go.


Any input is appreciated.
 

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Jul 24, 2013
#75
  • Jul 24, 2013
  • #75
Back from the dead.
That motor died out front of the house... long story.
The 230cfm heads have been junked. As it turns out they flowed 200cfm on a different (reputable) bench, and were too far ported to make any improvements.
I have a new set of worked E7's now, smaller valves, they do not flow 230cfm.
Progress is slow on the rebuild and I've gone 306. I have a different cam this time as well.
Hope to have it together September/October and dyno tune handy that same time frame.
I have also gone to an E-brok intake.
This one will be interesting.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jul 24, 2013
#76
  • Jul 24, 2013
  • #76
which intake, Mike? Gonna tell us which cam?
 

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Jul 25, 2013
#77
  • Jul 25, 2013
  • #77
Intake is a Victor EFI.
Cam is another custom from Buddy Rawls.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jul 25, 2013
#78
  • Jul 25, 2013
  • #78
if you want to sell that ported/shortened stocker, let me know and I'll send referrals if I get inquiries, Mike.
 

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Jul 25, 2013
#79
  • Jul 25, 2013
  • #79
I'd like to sell the HCI that made 292hp. Heads are bare and I have the springs and Ti retainers for the cam. That stuff has about 100 miles on it.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jul 25, 2013
#80
  • Jul 25, 2013
  • #80
I'll pass that along - in the mean time I'd list them in the classifieds here and Corral
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
865
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
432
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
I
Engine What Aluminum Heads???
  • Iceman1998
  • Sep 8, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 15, 2024
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
981
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?