• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

302 Stock Block Turbo

  • Thread starter Thread starter esr209
  • Start date Start date Apr 17, 2014
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

esr209

Member
Apr 9, 2014
29
3
14
Apr 18, 2014
#21
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #21
Kind of like when I couldnt find my non existent maf. I've come a little bit further in my progression of understanding all this.
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Apr 18, 2014
#22
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #22
I'm just going to state my opinion/recommendation here. OP I suggest you concentrate on the basics before trying to "rock" with a forced induction setup. If the engine needs a rebuild or you just want to improve performance, go for it. You can rebuild the motor with a good head,cam,intake,carb,long tube headers,ignition,etc and make a very strong street setup. Keep the compression down on the build so you can add a turbo or whatever later. You'll gain expierience and knowledge and have a strong running car.

Make sure the suspension,brakes,trans,etc are up to snuff before worrying about making a bunch of power. These cars can be a handful in near stock form. Of course I know you probably don't care about my rant/opinion but good luck
 
Reactions: tannerc91gt

esr209

Member
Apr 9, 2014
29
3
14
Apr 18, 2014
#23
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #23
I'm open to all opinions, and that was my second thought. Possibly just building then engine this summer and next summer go forced induction. I do like that idea, the only thing is I'd have to get a new block next summer for forced induction because I believe I'd be going over the safe power limit of the block with an h/c/i with turbo
 

MikeH686

Mine is only two inches though.
10 Year Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,843
1,753
184
Waldorf, MD
Apr 18, 2014
#24
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #24
A freshly rebuilt 306 with forged internals and forged crank with a truck flow top end will net you at or around 300whp slap a turbo and keep the boost low and you'll be shooting around 410 to the wheels. That's dam fast in these lightweight cars and you'll still be in the realm of the stock block
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,648
214
Acworth, GA
Apr 18, 2014
#25
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #25
As long as you don't go to boost insanity you'll be fine with the stock block. The problem with the turbo is that people get greedy and keep running up more and more boost to get more power.

Kurt
 
Reactions: MikeH686

MikeH686

Mine is only two inches though.
10 Year Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,843
1,753
184
Waldorf, MD
Apr 18, 2014
#26
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #26
Like Kurt said you may think you go up 2 lbs here 2 lbs there and meh you be alright you think but that's where you start breaking
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,648
214
Acworth, GA
Apr 18, 2014
#27
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #27
But I am the pot calling the kettle black because I keep jetting up the nitrous.

Kurt
 

MikeH686

Mine is only two inches though.
10 Year Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,843
1,753
184
Waldorf, MD
Apr 18, 2014
#28
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #28
Well you sir will just explode you along with Derek @srtthis ... You silly nitrous people
 
Reactions: 84Ttop

esr209

Member
Apr 9, 2014
29
3
14
Apr 18, 2014
#29
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #29
I'm thinking the turbo may be the way to go, rather than spending my money twice and getting a top end kit, and a turbo, while the turbo alone will make the hp I'm looking for
 
Reactions: 90lxcoupe

MikeH686

Mine is only two inches though.
10 Year Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,843
1,753
184
Waldorf, MD
Apr 18, 2014
#30
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #30
Well at least rebuild the bottom end if anything when you reach the capabilities of the stock block you can swap everything over to a dart block. That's my plan with my car swap everything over to a dart shp block
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,648
214
Acworth, GA
Apr 18, 2014
#31
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #31
esr209 said:
I'm thinking the turbo may be the way to go, rather than spending my money twice and getting a top end kit, and a turbo, while the turbo alone will make the hp I'm looking for
Click to expand...

I agree. A turbo with a good intercooler will get you to 400rwhp. I would get it up to that and leave it. If you spend a whole lot of money on a top end then you will be under utilizing the turbo. Or you could just push it to 500rwhp like I do and experiment.

Kurt
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,648
214
Acworth, GA
Apr 18, 2014
#32
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #32
MikeH686 said:
Well you sir will just explode you along with Derek @srtthis ... You silly nitrous people
Click to expand...

Nitrous is like getting hit in the center of the back with a dead blow hammer. I don't care what any one says, it's worth it.

Kurt
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Apr 18, 2014
#33
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #33
Don't mean to offend you but it seems like you (as we all have at some point) are jumping in over your head trying to turbo a carb'd fox when you don't seem to have a real grasp of either carbs or EFI at a pretty basic level.
I support anyone who shares my hobby and wants to learn and wrench. My only real advice is to read read read and read before you do anything at all.
That's my absolute favorite part about this hobby, you can never stop learning
 
Reactions: S&B, DesertDawg and MikeH686

bentley429isBAC

10 Year Member
Jul 23, 2009
922
188
84
CT
Apr 18, 2014
#34
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #34
What he said ^
 

MikeH686

Mine is only two inches though.
10 Year Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,843
1,753
184
Waldorf, MD
Apr 18, 2014
#35
  • Apr 18, 2014
  • #35
revhead347 said:
Nitrous is like getting hit in the center of the back with a dead blow hammer. I don't care what any one says, it's worth it.

Kurt
Click to expand...
Yeah also a blow to your nuts for not being a man lol
 

DesertDawg

Member
Apr 2, 2014
35
4
19
Apr 19, 2014
#36
  • Apr 19, 2014
  • #36
I want to 3rd what tannerc91gt said: 'Don't mean to offend you but it seems like you are jumping in over your head'. All I could offer would be a series of questions to get firm idea of what you want to achieve. Then I noticed your age and thought hmmm maybe handling mods rather than doubling the vehicles horsepower might be a good place to start?
If you start adding up the foxbody knowledge/experience of the frequent posters in just this
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) sub category it is measured in centuries

Properly done, you could get a lot bang for your bucks.
Is that your stock LX hatch in your avatar?
 

esr209

Member
Apr 9, 2014
29
3
14
Apr 19, 2014
#37
  • Apr 19, 2014
  • #37
Yes, that is my car in my avatar
 

Grabbin' Asphalt

10 Year Member
Jun 10, 2013
2,029
310
124
Atlanta, Ga
Apr 19, 2014
#38
  • Apr 19, 2014
  • #38
To the OP, the only reason I'm not putting boost(SC) to my DD is my bottom end has 200,000 miles on it. Granted a compression check was done a year ago and it's really good. But if I go adding boost to a non-freshly built bottom end, I will potentially have air pushing on every possible weak point in gaskets throughout the entire system, WHEREVER they might be. So when adding boost if your bottom end is not ready for it, in freshly rebuilt form, YOU WILL have pressure or blowby, on a weak ring, seal, oil pan gasket, head gasket or any weak point in your system and it will rear it's ugly head. You will have oil and liquids coming out of everywhere ...as she said 'tonight is bottoms up'
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,303
1,648
214
Acworth, GA
Apr 19, 2014
#39
  • Apr 19, 2014
  • #39
MikeH686 said:
Yeah also a blow to your nuts for not being a man lol
Click to expand...

Your car is slow.

Kurt
 

MikeH686

Mine is only two inches though.
10 Year Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,843
1,753
184
Waldorf, MD
Apr 19, 2014
#40
  • Apr 19, 2014
  • #40
Awh low blow my car don't run right now that's no fairrrrr
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
730
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
G
Fox Tire Size for 16" Pony Wheels on 1984 LX Convertible
  • gw7
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
149
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2026
Qtrhrse23
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
A
Thinking of building a BOSS 302 bottom end and have some questions!
  • Angelq1028
  • Apr 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
392
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2025
TOOLOW91
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?