• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

302 to a 331 ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter One91Fox
  • Start date Start date Jan 6, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
O

One91Fox

New Member
Jan 6, 2009
28
0
0
Decatur, AL/Starkville, MS
Jan 6, 2009
#1
  • Jan 6, 2009
  • #1
What is the easiest and best way to turn a factory 5.0 302 into a 331?
 
O

One91Fox

New Member
Jan 6, 2009
28
0
0
Decatur, AL/Starkville, MS
Jan 6, 2009
#2
  • Jan 6, 2009
  • #2
From 302 to 331

What is the easiest/ best way to take a factory 302 that has a few modifications and turn it into a 331?

Didn't mean to post twice, computer messed up.
 
I

irish

New Member
Oct 18, 2006
168
0
0
Florida
Jan 6, 2009
#3
  • Jan 6, 2009
  • #3
Buy a 331 stroker kit, take both to a good machine shop, done.

Sell the 302 and buy a shortblock from Fordstrokers.com, done.

Matt
 
B

Brian@PAR

New Member
Sep 15, 2008
86
0
0
Phoenix AZ
Jan 6, 2009
#4
  • Jan 6, 2009
  • #4
Don't do it at all. Turn that 302 into a 347 using the same procedure as above.
 
T

tiptop

New Member
Apr 6, 2008
73
0
0
Jan 6, 2009
#5
  • Jan 6, 2009
  • #5
yep, give woody a call at ford strokers
 
O

One91Fox

New Member
Jan 6, 2009
28
0
0
Decatur, AL/Starkville, MS
Jan 6, 2009
#6
  • Jan 6, 2009
  • #6
Are all these recomendations coming from experience with these blocks?
 

QUICK91LX

Founding Member
Dec 7, 2001
968
3
39
New Jersey
Jan 7, 2009
#7
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #7
This sort of thing has been done countless times with stock blocks...you can either go the route of purchasing the stroker kit and taking your motor along with the kit you buy to a machine shop who will do all machine and assembly work for you....or buy the motor in short block or even crate engine form from any of the various sources available...the Mustang aftermarket is huge. Do some research on heads, intakes, cams and all other various supporting mods for your project.
 

bynummustang

Seen my other Jackstand?
Jul 24, 2005
1
2
69
NC State University
Jan 7, 2009
#8
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #8
Make sure you know why you have chosen 331 over other strokers. Research and plan your motor from oil pan to throttle body.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,068
2,671
224
Vass, NC
Jan 7, 2009
#9
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #9
If done for the right reasons, going with a 331 can be preferable to going with a 347. However, the majority of gear-heads will be better off going with a 347. They have 16 more cubes and therefore will make more power, all else equal.

As mentioned do your homework, plan out the entire build, pick a block and internals that meet your requirements, and then find a good machine shop that you have faith in. Determine how much you expect everything to cost, then set aside twice that and you'll be ready for the project.

Chris
 
O

One91Fox

New Member
Jan 6, 2009
28
0
0
Decatur, AL/Starkville, MS
Jan 7, 2009
#10
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #10
So which would be better for a daily driven car that would see both road courses and drag strips? Possibly going to add a supercharger to the combo as well.
 

ShortThrow50

Member
Oct 22, 2006
923
2
16
Pa
Jan 7, 2009
#11
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #11
its easier and sometimes cheaper just to buy an already built stroker bottom end. i got my 347 shortblock built by woody at fordstrokers.com. if yor gonna do a blown 331 or 347, you should prolly buy a block that can handle the power and thats gonna run you almost 2k extra. IMO if you wanna go the blower or turbo route, you should just stay with a 302. If yor gonna go with the regular stock block n/a stroker route or any route for that matter i hope you have something other than stock h/c/i
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jan 7, 2009
#12
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #12
Brian@PAR said:
Don't do it at all. Turn that 302 into a 347 using the same procedure as above.
Click to expand...

 
O

One91Fox

New Member
Jan 6, 2009
28
0
0
Decatur, AL/Starkville, MS
Jan 7, 2009
#13
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #13
What would be a better h/c/i combo for the 347 stroker than what I currently run on my 302?
Current h/c/i is ported stock heads, b303 cam, and gt-40 intake. I know that there are many other parts that are much better, but what are some individual opinions on what combo to run?
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,947
2,901
194
Middle of Maine
Jan 7, 2009
#14
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #14
One91Fox said:
What would be a better h/c/i combo for the 347 stroker than what I currently run on my 302?
Current h/c/i is ported stock heads, b303 cam, and gt-40 intake. I know that there are many other parts that are much better, but what are some individual opinions on what combo to run?
Click to expand...

AFR 185 heads, custom cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM 2 or Victor EFI (depends on LOTS of things) or even a TFS Intake. Do not forget bigger fuel injectors, Throttle Body, MAF...........ect............
 

ShortThrow50

Member
Oct 22, 2006
923
2
16
Pa
Jan 7, 2009
#15
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #15
Bullitt347 said:
AFR 185 heads, custom cam, Edelbrock Performer RPM 2 or Victor EFI (depends on LOTS of things) or even a TFS Intake. Do not forget bigger fuel injectors, Throttle Body, MAF...........ect............
Click to expand...

i agree or at least spend 2400 on a tfs top end kit. you can substitude the stage 1 cam out for a stage 2 if you call summit. i run a stage 2. that kit is complete and flows close to afr 185 heads
 
O

One91Fox

New Member
Jan 6, 2009
28
0
0
Decatur, AL/Starkville, MS
Jan 7, 2009
#16
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #16
ShortThrow50 said:
i agree or at least spend 2400 on a tfs top end kit. you can substitude the stage 1 cam out for a stage 2 if you call summit. i run a stage 2. that kit is complete and flows close to afr 185 heads
Click to expand...

If you don't mind me asking, how much power does your setup put out?
 
B

Brian@PAR

New Member
Sep 15, 2008
86
0
0
Phoenix AZ
Jan 7, 2009
#17
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #17
Here is a suggestion

Rebuild the 302 using some light hyper pistons and put a set of RHS 200 heads, custom cam and a track heat intake on it. You'll make 425 at the flywheel N/A. The motor will idle smooth, not load up, and pull to 7K. Save your dough for an early, Mexican, or aftermarket block (BOSS 302 would work just fine) then do the 347 with the same parts but a new cam and make 550 N/A.

You could do the 347 in a roller block but you are pushing your luck at 550 and the tune is critical at that power level in a roller block.

Oh and IMO the only reason to do a 331 is if you are an inexperianced builder as there are some things that are "special" about a 347. Opinions vary on this subject but there are two things that are NOT a concern. Built right a 347 will not use oil and the rod stroke ratio is not an issue.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,068
2,671
224
Vass, NC
Jan 7, 2009
#18
  • Jan 7, 2009
  • #18
Brian@PAR said:
Oh and IMO the only reason to do a 331 is if you are an inexperianced builder as there are some things that are "special" about a 347. Opinions vary on this subject but there are two things that are NOT a concern. Built right a 347 will not use oil and the rod stroke ratio is not an issue.
Click to expand...

Because it's not worth starting argument/long-winded-discussion #1423 on this subject, I'll just say that I completely concur with the bolded portion of this quote, and in the OPs case, there is no reason to build a 331.

Chris
 

reddog

New Member
Oct 30, 2008
11
0
0
Jan 8, 2009
#19
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #19
If you want a stoker that will last.... go with the 331.. but don't go the cheap way out buy good stuff man!!! If its a pinks show, just buy something thats cheap or on sale!!!!
 

ShortThrow50

Member
Oct 22, 2006
923
2
16
Pa
Jan 8, 2009
#20
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #20
One91Fox said:
If you don't mind me asking, how much power does your setup put out?
Click to expand...

havent fired it up yet bro. its still on the stand. i will let you know when it goes to the dyno. the picture below was when i test fitted to see if the engine would go in with the lt headers attached. needless to say it di
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Engine Help 331 stroker
  • pdmount
  • Feb 19, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
253
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 21, 2026
pdmount
P
T
Oil burning on my recently buil 302
  • The blk67
  • May 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
109
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 15, 2026
Noobz347
O
New (Old) guy
  • OX1
  • Oct 19, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
9
Views
271
The Welcome Wagon Oct 24, 2025
OX1
O
J
can you use the heads off a H O 302 to put on a regular 302 engine
  • Jan H
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
285
Other Auto Tech May 17, 2026
nickyb
H
Engine Central Connecticut Service Needed - 1990 302
  • Harburmaster
  • Sep 16, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
117
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 16, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?