• Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech

302 Vibration

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mystang66
  • Start date Start date Jul 8, 2021

Mystang66

Member
Jul 23, 2011
76
16
19
Minneapolis, MN
Jul 8, 2021
#1
  • Jul 8, 2021
  • #1
I have 302 HO out of a 1985 Mustang in my II. Just recently finished restoring the car. The engine was built with a mild cam, Weiand intake, Holley 4bbl carb, Hedman headers. The transmission and torque converter were just rebuilt a mouth ago and I have a 141 tooth 50 oz imbalance flexplate from Art Carr (CPT) in the car. I just took it into a local mechanic today to dial it in (idle and timing) and he told me he thinks there is too much vibration. He checked the harmonic balancer and it was correct. He thinks it may be the wrong flex plate, but I'm certain thats correct, because I verified it before putting it in. Looking for other suggestions on what it might be. BTW, I just ran a compression check on all cylinders and everything checked out.
 
Last edited: Jul 8, 2021

LILCBRA

I wish I didn't have all of these balls in the air
Mod Dude
Dec 6, 2005
6,316
5,286
194
Corn County USA
Jul 9, 2021
#2
  • Jul 9, 2021
  • #2
Is it a possibility that the local mechanic doesn't have experience with older/modified engines and thinks that they run more like newer cars?
 

2Blue2

will be trying this sex one when I can find it
Mod Dude
Mar 5, 2019
4,430
2,893
163
Oahu
Jul 9, 2021
#3
  • Jul 9, 2021
  • #3
It all sounds straight forward enough but...
You say 'out of' an 85, did you check casting number yourself? Could your block have been rebuilt with the 28.2 imbalance crank?
Might need to have whole rotating assembly balanced together.

Motor Trend Quote;

Prior to 1981, production 302s used a 28.2 oz-in imbalance factor. The 1981-and-later production 302 engines, the current Ford Racing 302-based crate engines, and all the late, unlamented 255ci engines have lightweight cranks that require the 50 oz-in imbalance factor. (Caution: There are reports that some rebuilt, remanufactured "service-replacement" 302 engines intended for 1980-and-earlier models—even some sold through Ford Service—were rebuilt using lightweight cranks, which would require a 50 oz-in flywheel and damper.)
 
Reactions: 7991LXnSHO and Enzio

Enzio

Dang it. I was hoping mine would get 3 more inches
5 Year Member
May 14, 2019
1,054
840
133
Minnesota
Jul 9, 2021
#4
  • Jul 9, 2021
  • #4
Pictures please.
 

Mystang66

Member
Jul 23, 2011
76
16
19
Minneapolis, MN
Jul 9, 2021
#5
  • Jul 9, 2021
  • #5
LILCBRA said:
Is it a possibility that the local mechanic doesn't have experience with older/modified engines and thinks that they run more like newer cars?
Click to expand...
He specializes in classics, though he hasn’t worked on a II before.
 

Mystang66

Member
Jul 23, 2011
76
16
19
Minneapolis, MN
Jul 9, 2021
#6
  • Jul 9, 2021
  • #6
2Blue2 said:
It all sounds straight forward enough but...
You say 'out of' an 85, did you check casting number yourself? Could your block have been rebuilt with the 28.2 imbalance crank?
Might need to have whole rotating assembly balanced together.

Motor Trend Quote;

Prior to 1981, production 302s used a 28.2 oz-in imbalance factor. The 1981-and-later production 302 engines, the current Ford Racing 302-based crate engines, and all the late, unlamented 255ci engines have lightweight cranks that require the 50 oz-in imbalance factor. (Caution: There are reports that some rebuilt, remanufactured "service-replacement" 302 engines intended for 1980-and-earlier models—even some sold through Ford Service—were rebuilt using lightweight cranks, which would require a 50 oz-in flywheel and damper.)
Click to expand...
I verified casting while I had it apart. It is possible that someone swapped out the crank to a 28 oz at some point I guess. I never verified the crank part number.
 

Mystang66

Member
Jul 23, 2011
76
16
19
Minneapolis, MN
Jul 9, 2021
#7
  • Jul 9, 2021
  • #7
Enzio said:
Pictures please.
Click to expand...
 
Reactions: extra_stout and Enzio

LILCBRA

I wish I didn't have all of these balls in the air
Mod Dude
Dec 6, 2005
6,316
5,286
194
Corn County USA
Jul 10, 2021
#8
  • Jul 10, 2021
  • #8
I can't tell you what it would feel like if the wrong flexplate/flywheel and/or balancer were used, I've never experienced it. But I did have a balancer break a long time ago. I don't remember there being funny vibrations per se, but it did feel a lot different for the short drive I had to make with it with nothing attached at the crank. As weird as it may sound, it actually felt a lot more smooth running from what I recall. But that was close to 30 years ago now....
 

2Blue2

will be trying this sex one when I can find it
Mod Dude
Mar 5, 2019
4,430
2,893
163
Oahu
Jul 10, 2021
#9
  • Jul 10, 2021
  • #9
Under hood looks clean!
Mystang66 said:
It is possible that someone swapped out the crank to a 28 oz at some point
Click to expand...
Alot of the budget crank kits back in the day were based on 28 oz crank

Was just a thought.

Had of a stock harmonic balancer leave my car in the traps at the 1/4 mile.
If it hadn't taken the R. hose with it i might not have noticed till next pass, drove it home.

I've seen a torque converter cause engine vibration, but fresh rebuild right?
 

Enzio

Dang it. I was hoping mine would get 3 more inches
5 Year Member
May 14, 2019
1,054
840
133
Minnesota
Jul 10, 2021
#10
  • Jul 10, 2021
  • #10
Wow. Air Conditioning that actually looks functional.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Jul 10, 2021
#11
  • Jul 10, 2021
  • #11
LILCBRA said:
I can't tell you what it would feel like if the wrong flexplate/flywheel and/or balancer were used, I've never experienced it. But I did have a balancer break a long time ago. I don't remember there being funny vibrations per se, but it did feel a lot different for the short drive I had to make with it with nothing attached at the crank. As weird as it may sound, it actually felt a lot more smooth running from what I recall. But that was close to 30 years ago now....
Click to expand...
I can. The 28 Oz balance flywheel and balancer on a 50 Oz rotating assy shakes a heck of a lot by 3000 rpm. It scares you that it will fly apart.
 
Reactions: LILCBRA

Mystang66

Member
Jul 23, 2011
76
16
19
Minneapolis, MN
Jul 10, 2021
#12
  • Jul 10, 2021
  • #12
2Blue2 said:
Under hood looks clean!

Alot of the budget crank kits back in the day were based on 28 oz crank

Was just a thought.

Had of a stock harmonic balancer leave my car in the traps at the 1/4 mile.
If it hadn't taken the R. hose with it i might not have noticed till next pass, drove it home.

I've seen a torque converter cause engine vibration, but fresh rebuild right?
Click to expand...
Yes, fresh rebuild. Maybe only 100 miles on it. I’ve added a video of it running.
 

LILCBRA

I wish I didn't have all of these balls in the air
Mod Dude
Dec 6, 2005
6,316
5,286
194
Corn County USA
Jul 11, 2021
#13
  • Jul 11, 2021
  • #13
Mystang66 said:
Yes, fresh rebuild. Maybe only 100 miles on it. I’ve added a video of it running.
Click to expand...
Where is the video?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
668
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
N
Vibration issue
  • Nicolaj
  • Apr 14, 2024
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
1K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 8, 2024
AeroCoupe
Engine 302 production block selection
  • FastDriver
  • May 19, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2025
FastDriver
WTB/Trade 50 oz flexplate needed
  • Mystang66
  • Jan 25, 2021
  • Mustang II Parts
Replies
1
Views
1K
Mustang II Parts Jan 25, 2021
Adieu
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 16, 2024
revhead347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?