• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

330 ft times

  • Thread starter Thread starter gt40_2003wes
  • Start date Start date Aug 2, 2007

gt40_2003wes

I did sound a wee bit gay there.
Aug 14, 2005
461
2
48
ky
Aug 2, 2007
#1
  • Aug 2, 2007
  • #1
hey guys we have a local track tht we use to run 1/8th miles in but do to some work on the track this year tht didnt turn out very well they have shortened it to 330 ft for the year and we just now got the trick flow topend kit and a set of ET streets radials and i was wondering what u how these times sounds they are as follows.


60 ft 1.96
330ft 5.69
mph 69.23



so how does tht sound? good? bad?
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Aug 2, 2007
#2
  • Aug 2, 2007
  • #2
the 60ft's pretty good, work on the 60ft and youll lower it fo sho!! I really dont know any specs on the 330ft track though......
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 3, 2007
#3
  • Aug 3, 2007
  • #3
I would average 5.3-5.4 on the 330 ft. times. I don't know the mph though...

Try hitting second gear a bit quicker...

I ran 1.9 60 fts with my Nitto's (no burnout), with AFR 165, FTI cam, Performer intake, full accessories and full weight minus smog, but with added weight - subframes. 3400 lb race weight and stock suspension.
 

gt40_2003wes

I did sound a wee bit gay there.
Aug 14, 2005
461
2
48
ky
Aug 5, 2007
#4
  • Aug 5, 2007
  • #4
5spd GT said:
I would average 5.3-5.4 on the 330 ft. times. I don't know the mph though...

Try hitting second gear a bit quicker...

I ran 1.9 60 fts with my Nitto's (no burnout), with AFR 165, FTI cam, Performer intake, full accessories and full weight minus smog, but with added weight - subframes. 3400 lb race weight and stock suspension.
Click to expand...



yea im sure we could get it tht low but were leaving off of idle im affraid if i dump it at 4 grand ill either break the rearend or the t5 and it has a stock clutch so tht doesnt help either. i also have subframes but took out the rear seat.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Aug 5, 2007
#5
  • Aug 5, 2007
  • #5
I have a 12.809 run from a long time ago in front of me and it shows a 5.245 330'...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Foxtoberfest 2022
  • FastDriver
  • Sep 6, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2022
Ford Moore
F
F
Progress Thread I'm restoring my dad's fox body and I have some questions regarding my engine restoration
  • Fitzjack
  • Apr 5, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
7K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 10, 2021
Willybill32
Fuel Fuel Pump Rewire, New Fuel Lines, and Installation of New Fuel Pump Hanger with AN6 Connections
  • AeroCoupe
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
13K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 16, 2023
AeroCoupe
Engine Cam idle and timing questions - big cam, little knowledge
  • Justin87
  • Jul 6, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
11K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2021
Middleagecrisis
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?