• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

331 or 347 stroker?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tx2000gt
  • Start date Start date Aug 31, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
T

tx2000gt

New Member
May 27, 2005
222
0
0
Aug 31, 2005
#1
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #1
I didn't know 347's had a tendency to break cylinder walls...
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Aug 31, 2005
#2
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #2
They DONT!! the .030 over bore is pretty much normal over bore for the 5.0 !! Is someone trying to sell you on this?? or did you read it somewhere??

Just me......................

Thumper
 

txstang84

15 Year Member
May 21, 2005
1,639
42
69
Tuscola, tx
Aug 31, 2005
#3
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #3
it's not that a 347 will break the cylinder walls, but because of rod angles, the potential to wear the walls quicker is higher with a 347, than with a 331. Metallurgy and technology have come a long way, but geometry and physics have been with us from day one...they still trump technology

...but that statement will probably cause a holy war with the 347 owners anyway...

but, the debate between which is better, 331 or 347, is very much a dead horse. the 347 will make more power simply due to more cubes...but people like me will go for the 331 because of personal reasons.

in a nutshell...build what you want, whether it be a 331, 347, or a 355...but if you really want cubes in a windsor package, go with a 351 based stroker...
 

huRACEmentPSR

Banned
Apr 2, 2005
101
0
0
San Jose, CA
Aug 31, 2005
#4
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #4
ive been told that a 331 is more of a roadrace motor, and 347s make good drag motors....i guess because the 331s hold up better under a long race and 347s are better for short bursts....thats just my understanding tho
 

txstang84

15 Year Member
May 21, 2005
1,639
42
69
Tuscola, tx
Aug 31, 2005
#5
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #5
making a road race motor is all in how you build it...besides having those short bursts is great for coming out of the turns and powering past people on straightaways...
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 31, 2005
#6
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #6
The 347 won't break the cylinder wall in itself but if you have a combo pushing the potential of the block with a 331 and it "wants" to crack...well having the same combo with a 347 could push it over the edge and "crack" it.

There is a reason why they make both 331's and 347's. They both have their pros/cons. 331's - a bit more longevity or a 347 - a bit more power.
 
T

tx2000gt

New Member
May 27, 2005
222
0
0
Aug 31, 2005
#7
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #7
Which has a better gas mileage lol?
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 31, 2005
#8
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #8
tx2000gt said:
Which has a better gas mileage lol?
Click to expand...

Suprisingly my 93 saturn gets better gas mileage then my 347
 
T

tx2000gt

New Member
May 27, 2005
222
0
0
Aug 31, 2005
#9
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #9
Wait wait, whats your mpg...on both?
 

bubba-dough

Active Member
Dec 28, 2004
1,044
2
38
Indiana
Sep 1, 2005
#10
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #10
I went with a Canton main girdle on my 347. At $190 it was some affordable piece of mind.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 1, 2005
#11
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #11
I like the 331 set up myself.....but I'm also leaning towards a power adder in my head when I envision it.
 
K

kennebell331

New Member
Aug 3, 2005
21
0
0
Sep 1, 2005
#12
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #12
txstang84 said:
it's not that a 347 will break the cylinder walls, but because of rod angles, the potential to wear the walls quicker is higher with a 347, than with a 331. Metallurgy and technology have come a long way, but geometry and physics have been with us from day one...they still trump technology

...but that statement will probably cause a holy war with the 347 owners anyway...

but, the debate between which is better, 331 or 347, is very much a dead horse. the 347 will make more power simply due to more cubes...but people like me will go for the 331 because of personal reasons.

in a nutshell...build what you want, whether it be a 331, 347, or a 355...but if you really want cubes in a windsor package, go with a 351 based stroker...
Click to expand...

Cylinder walls are being broken in 347's from cylinder to cylinder fuel variations. which is caused from the rebound of nitrous. Im with txstang84, 331 BABY!!!!
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Sep 1, 2005
#13
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #13
331 here
 

txstang84

15 Year Member
May 21, 2005
1,639
42
69
Tuscola, tx
Sep 1, 2005
#14
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #14
kennebell331 said:
Cylinder walls are being broken in 347's from cylinder to cylinder fuel variations. which is caused from the rebound of nitrous. Im with txstang84, 331 BABY!!!!
Click to expand...


i was under the impression the "stories" of broken cylinder walls were either urban legend, or someone who tried to put too much power to the stock block (boost or spray), in which case, inherent imperfections in the block, i.e. core shift would most certainly be a contributor to such block failures
 

stangbanger94

New Member
Apr 29, 2004
203
0
0
Bergen County, NJ
Sep 1, 2005
#15
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #15
bubba-dough said:
I went with a Canton main girdle on my 347. At $190 it was some affordable piece of mind.
Click to expand...

The main girdle is just a band aid for when you crack the block. It keeps everything together till you take it off
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Sep 1, 2005
#16
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #16
Most cases of broken 302 blocks happen right up the middle, isn't that right? Of course a 347 making more power than a 331 is more likley to break the block, and if the motor's internals come apart who all knows what all is going to get broken. The only one I know of who broke the cylinder walls was the guy I got my hood and other stuff from when he ran a high lift cam on stock springs and dropped a valve, shattering the stock hyper pistons (93) and breaking the cylinder wall as well. The valve looked better than the piston.
 

txstang84

15 Year Member
May 21, 2005
1,639
42
69
Tuscola, tx
Sep 1, 2005
#17
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #17
the ones i've seen, yes-right in between the cam and main journals...
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Sep 1, 2005
#18
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #18
The increased angle would cause more stress on the wall, but we know since the weak point is the middle of the block, that really ins an issue. The splitting of the block would be caused by the clinder banks being pushed against and from each other durring the strokes of the cylinders. Now the only debate now is would the increased rod angles cause more stress between the cylinder banks, increasing the tendancy to split the block under the same power levels?
 

txstang84

15 Year Member
May 21, 2005
1,639
42
69
Tuscola, tx
Sep 1, 2005
#19
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • #19
makes sense...but, you don't even have to run a stroker to split the block, a 302 pushing 500hp will run the same risk

the stock 302 block is just inherently weak...the main webbing leaves much to be desired when it comes down to strutural integrity
 

bubba-dough

Active Member
Dec 28, 2004
1,044
2
38
Indiana
Sep 2, 2005
#20
  • Sep 2, 2005
  • #20
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Electrical Spark Plugs
  • jimzzilla
  • Feb 24, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
844
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 28, 2026
jimzzilla
C
C4 trans help needed
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
136
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2026
CPH89LX
C
D
Harmonic Balancer brand, weight?
  • dropteeth
  • Sep 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
211
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 18, 2025
revhead347
P
Engine Help 331 stroker
  • pdmount
  • Feb 19, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
252
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 21, 2026
pdmount
P
C
347 advice
  • CRonaldo773
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
252
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?