• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

331 Turbo vs 408

  • Thread starter Thread starter ponypowa2
  • Start date Start date Aug 28, 2007

Choose your engine

  • 331 dart block turbo - turbo domestic rules

    Votes: 13 48.1%
  • 408 - to hell with power adders, wheres my cowl hood

    Votes: 12 44.4%
  • turkey sammich

    Votes: 2 7.4%

  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed Sep 27, 2007.
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
P

ponypowa2

New Member
May 17, 2004
228
0
0
Destin, FL
Aug 28, 2007
#1
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #1
Which would you choose and why?

also any opinions on the subject would be great.


I think overall a 408 build is cheaper then a 331 turbo combo somone correct me if im wrong..


Please keep the opinions street/autocross based, im not to concerned with drag racing


How much heavier would the windsor be?
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Aug 28, 2007
#2
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #2
I vote 408. Cheaper than a turbo 331, easier to tune, stronger block, unless you're talking aftermarket for either one? Sure, you may need a new hood, but the Cobra R hood is sexy anyway.
 

gcomfx.com

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,690
0
56
Republic, MO
Aug 28, 2007
#3
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #3
I don't have the patients for a turbo. Too much work putting it all together, and then keeping it all that way.

408 - and you can always juice it if you want more.
 

1TallMF

New Member
Apr 17, 2006
955
1
0
Montreal
Aug 28, 2007
#4
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #4
408 - Cheaper, stronger, more reliable, and just plain bad-ass
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Aug 28, 2007
#5
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #5
Lets stop saying stronger cause a factory 351w block (69-71 or whatever years) isnt stronger than a Dart block which is in the poll for the 331.....

I'd be worried about front end weight with that big windsor for autocrossing....although i dont know much about the sport anyway. Turbo's are good once they're together and running, but thats a lot of crap to have to take off to fix it. But then again, it'd be a smaller advantage in weight cause of all the turbo stuff up front.

I think a 408 would be funner on the street....cheaper to build...easier to maintain...less crap to worry about....easier to fix....

I'd vote 408.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 28, 2007
#6
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #6
i decided to go 408 because i wanted a reliable mill with boatloads of torque all across the rpm range. i want to be able to just jump in the car and drive it anywhere without having to worry about anything. i am of the opinion that my goal is much easier to accomplish with a naturally aspirated motor than it is with a forced induction motor.
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Aug 28, 2007
#7
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #7
408... then plan for a few psi of boost in one form or another later...
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Aug 28, 2007
#8
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #8
That's tough. Both will be a lot of work and both will be crazy fast. A high compression, high revving 408 would be pretty sweet though.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Aug 28, 2007
#9
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #9
"I'd be worried about front end weight with that big windsor for autocrossing...."

50# so that's not an issue. The turbos and tubing and intercooler..same for same.

I can't believe how well my car handles wth that new swaybar 1 3/8"..so I would recommend one of those whichever eng.

If you go turbo 331, you'd better get a dart like nmcgrawj was saying. older 351 blocks are getting harder to find though..but the newer ones are very strong as well.
 

rio95

Member
Nov 18, 2003
829
1
17
Grand Rapids, MI
Aug 28, 2007
#10
  • Aug 28, 2007
  • #10
In my ideal set-up, a 408 would not make even close to enough power (typically). But a dart 331 with a turbo, now we're talking.

The 331 turbo would be quite a bit more money, but way more power, so I guess it depends on you.

As for weight, why is everyone saying the 408 set-up would be heavier? It is quite the opposite in my opinion.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Aug 29, 2007
#11
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #11
rio95 said:
As for weight, why is everyone saying the 408 set-up would be heavier? It is quite the opposite in my opinion.
Click to expand...

well a 351w motor is heavier than a 331, mainly from the block. I have never measured or saw actual numbers, so when u get into aftermarket the margin might not be nearly as big as some think. But the turbo stuff makes it even anyway....if not making the 331 more heavy
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Aug 29, 2007
#12
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #12
Whats the goal of the car?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 29, 2007
#13
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #13
I have understood the 351 block to weigh around 30+ lbs more. I do not recall if that is block weight or block with internals.

Either way, the 331 will probably be quite a bit more expensive with the turbo installed. It would be faster though with the right amount of boost.

An N/A combo is less forgiving, and you could still rack out 450 rwhp out of it fairly easily. The turbo adds weight as well, which may negate the difference between the two possible combos more.

On the contrary, a 351 intake is going to weigh more as well...
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Aug 29, 2007
#14
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #14
Whoever said the 408 would be more fun on the street has obviously never been in a fast turbo car. The sound alone is worth hours of fun. Overall though the fact is it comes down to the plans of the car. The 408 won't be anywhere near as fast so its kind of comparing apples to oranges considering the 408 will probably make around 450 rwhp and a 331 with a t70 with reasonable boost will make 600 rwhp. Just ask Eades. I believe his car is a 331 and I know he has a t70.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 29, 2007
#15
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #15
Its all about the application

There is W A Y more to building a successful combo than just being able
to say this or that combo makes such and such rwhp

You can have a motor that makes mega hp
and
If the drive line and chassis are not setup to take it

Well ...

Grady
 

rio95

Member
Nov 18, 2003
829
1
17
Grand Rapids, MI
Aug 29, 2007
#16
  • Aug 29, 2007
  • #16
Black Stampede said:
Whoever said the 408 would be more fun on the street has obviously never been in a fast turbo car. The sound alone is worth hours of fun. Overall though the fact is it comes down to the plans of the car. The 408 won't be anywhere near as fast so its kind of comparing apples to oranges considering the 408 will probably make around 450 rwhp and a 331 with a t70 with reasonable boost will make 600 rwhp. Just ask Eades. I believe his car is a 331 and I know he has a t70.
Click to expand...

600 rwhp?? Thats weak as hell. Why have a 331 then?? I was talking about an aftermarket block (which is heavier in most cases). So I think you meant to say 800-1000 rwhp. Sounds more fun than a NA 408 to me.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 30, 2007
#17
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #17
question: i know these were not mentioned as options, but:

why not put a turbo on a 351-based mill? don't the aftermarket 302 and 351 blocks and forged rotating assemblies cost fairly close to each other?

another popular option is to go 408 and then spray it for that extra kick when you need it ...

also, there is a certain logic to jr's approach. he has a stock bottom end ... then if (or more like when!) he blows up his motor, he just gets another 302 for a couple hundred and bolts his stuff onto that and he is back on the road again.

starting with a 351 block is like starting with an extra 50 cubes for free (compared to a stock 302). if you stroke 302 to 331, then a similarly stroked 351 would be 393 cubes. how can you go wrong with that?

if it were me, i'd start with the most cubes i could start with and then strap my power adder of choice to that. if i had the money for an aftermarket block and wanted a power adder, i'd want to go with a turbo'd 351. that probably would end up in the same ballpark as a turbo'd 331. but either way, i'd start with a 351 and go from there.
 

Engel

Member
Apr 2, 2005
219
0
16
Currently Fort Walton Beach
Aug 30, 2007
#18
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #18
how much can the 351 blocks withstand?


I understand where you are coming from but it seems there is more potential problems with a turbo ie additional heat, more parts , increased upkeep, more wieght
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 30, 2007
#19
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #19
5spd GT said:
... An N/A combo is less forgiving ...
Click to expand...
don't you mean, "An N/A combo is more forgiving", or "An N/A combo is less finicky" ?

Engel said:
how much can the 351 blocks withstand?
Click to expand...
they are a good bit stronger than a stock 302 block. read this ...

http://bbs.hardcore50.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=27754&highlight=stock+351+block+strength

http://bbs.hardcore50.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=14214&highlight=stock+351+block+strength
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 30, 2007
#20
  • Aug 30, 2007
  • #20
BlackVert said:
don't you mean, "An N/A combo is more forgiving", or "An N/A combo is less finicky" ?
Click to expand...

Yep, your right, typo. An N/A combo is more forgiving... I'll edit...

Yeah, I have even read that the newer roller (late model 351 blocks) even handle some nice power
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sunday at 3:20 PM
GearHeadGuy
E
For Sale 1989 LX Notch 410ci 85mm turbo 8 pt cage 9" rear end
  • EightyNineFive
  • Aug 22, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 18, 2022
Freakinstang
F
L
Putting together a 408 stroker for a 94-95 sn95 car. Need some input.
  • Luis Ceballos
  • May 31, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 3, 2018
TOOLOW91
Drivetrain 33 spline SN axle with ABS and parking brake build
  • revhead347
  • May 12, 2020
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
3K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 12, 2020
revhead347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?