• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

347 DRIVEABILITY...any good?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pokageek
  • Start date Start date Jan 27, 2007

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jan 27, 2007
#1
  • Jan 27, 2007
  • #1
Hi guys. Those of you with 347's...hows the low end TQ seat of pants and TQ curve (not dyno) compared to your experience with the 5.0. Big difference? How about HP. Did you notice a significant difference? or do you wish you went bigger?

What about the FEEL of a "stroker" compared to like a LT1 or LS1? Does the longer stroke make it rev slower? What's the difference in feel? Thx.

EDIT; I just realized that I asked this question b4 but I have been going thru so many scenarios that I forgot. Sorry.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Jan 27, 2007
#2
  • Jan 27, 2007
  • #2
The TQ is excellent and the power works for me. Its obviously much less than when I had the 302 with bolt on's and 12psi from the Vortech. The 347 is much more driveability friendly then the supercharged combo. I love the fact that I can get in it, beat on it and get out of it. Just couldn't do it with the blower. Very finicky and each day brought up new issues. Sure sometimes I wish I had did a 408 but then I realize I have to stop some where. It's been a year with the 347 and still happy.
 

trav_19

New Member
Oct 29, 2006
810
0
0
Jackson, MI
Jan 28, 2007
#3
  • Jan 28, 2007
  • #3
are you thinking of going efi or carb setup 347?
 

SQUEEZE&STROKE

New Member
Jun 24, 2005
0
0
0
SOUTHERN CA
Jan 28, 2007
#4
  • Jan 28, 2007
  • #4
I have a 331...so it's close to the 347. I can tell you that it feels so much better just driving it. SOTP feel is awesome and it definately makes more torque.

Like mentioned before, Its nice to just beat on it and not worry about it. Motor cars are FTW!
 

gcomfx.com

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,690
0
56
Republic, MO
Jan 29, 2007
#5
  • Jan 29, 2007
  • #5
Tell you in a month or so.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
Just Some Suggestion's For Foxes
  • Detroiit
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2014
Noobz347
Finally! A valid TFS-R and TFS Box R intake dyno comparison on a street stroker.
  • FastDriver
  • Oct 19, 2011
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
58
Views
39K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 6, 2025
FastDriver
NA 418, 347, 5.0, & Blown 5.0 Dyno Pull Compare-O
  • final5-0
  • Aug 2, 2008
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
19
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 6, 2008
S351Saleen77
8
  • Locked
FS: 1993 LX 5.0 347 stroker reef blue/black int.
  • 87nitemare
  • Mar 9, 2010
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
19K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 19, 2010
87nitemare
8
302 Stroker Information
  • 5spd GT
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
66K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 26, 2007
bullitstang1313
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?