• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

347 or 427???

  • Thread starter Thread starter Buckhunter125@h
  • Start date Start date Nov 2, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
B

Buckhunter125@h

New Member
Jul 18, 2008
44
0
0
illinois
Nov 2, 2008
#1
  • Nov 2, 2008
  • #1
Now I have a new dilemma . I've been planning a 347 stroker kit for my 302 in my 68 FB, but now i'm thinkin about the 427 sittin in my father in laws shop gathering dust . I just might be able to buy it at a fair price..

which way would you go ????
 
P

P-Zero

New Member
Oct 31, 2008
15
0
0
Michigan
Nov 2, 2008
#2
  • Nov 2, 2008
  • #2
Nobrainer 427 all the way. That motor was built for racing and race cars. And they're super rare, your car will be unique. Another plus, itll have gobs and gobs of torque.
-P.
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Nov 3, 2008
#3
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #3
351 stroked to 427 or the original 427?
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Nov 3, 2008
#4
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #4
I would rather have a run of the mill 347 in my car. I like to turn corners and it would be lighter. Also it won't have so much power to break other parts of the drivetrain or twist the body too much if I get sticky tires.

A fair price on a 427 is BIG MONEY! I wouldn't run a 427 in any car that I own. I would invest the money, rather than using it up. I think it would be more fun to drive the car hard and if the engine blows up build another rather than having a really rare, expensive motor that should be babied and not too many miles put on.
 
B

Buckhunter125@h

New Member
Jul 18, 2008
44
0
0
illinois
Nov 3, 2008
#5
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #5
its an original 427
 
M

mustangbrad

Member
Aug 16, 2004
127
5
19
Nov 3, 2008
#6
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #6
You won't have to remove or notch the shock towers in a '68. there is enough room there already. The '68 came from the factory with "FE" engines in them. That being said, I would go with a 347 of a 408W because of the reasons already stated. The 427 will be expensive and much harder to get parts for.
 
P

pyroman

Founding Member
Jul 28, 2002
480
3
18
Ennis, Texas
Nov 3, 2008
#7
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #7
I'm kind of shy about the 347 just because I have it in my head that they are kind of fragile. I could be wrong, and original 427 would be pretty cool but it all depends on your goals for the car.
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Nov 3, 2008
#8
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #8
mustangbrad said:
You won't have to remove or notch the shock towers in a '68. there is enough room there already. The '68 came from the factory with "FE" engines in them. That being said, I would go with a 347 of a 408W because of the reasons already stated. The 427 will be expensive and much harder to get parts for.
Click to expand...

+1 and the fact the car will go around corners better with the lighter engine. Good luck on the decision. A real 427 would be hard to turn down.
 

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Nov 3, 2008
#9
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #9
How often do your REALLY push your car hard through turns?? IMHO, 99% of the time you'll be driving around town and stop light to stop light.
 
B

Buckhunter125@h

New Member
Jul 18, 2008
44
0
0
illinois
Nov 3, 2008
#10
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #10
Z06killinSBF said:
How often do your REALLY push your car hard through turns?? IMHO, 99% of the time you'll be driving around town and stop light to stop light.
Click to expand...


yep thats kinda what I was thinkin ........... heck in the long run it just might save me money ............... I wont need to spend money on stroking and heads and other parts ????? ........... shoot the stock HP and Torque will probably make me grin !!!!!
 
A

alexb_

New Member
Nov 23, 2007
30
0
0
Nov 3, 2008
#11
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #11
I would go with the 347, or 331 if you're worried about reliability. My two reasons would be (1) weight and (2) I like being able to reach my spark plugs.
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Nov 3, 2008
#12
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #12
Another thing you may want to consider that I don't know the answer to is will the 427 bolt up to your tranny and will the new engine/tranny combo it affect the length of your driveshaft. How much will headers run for a 427? Do you need new engine mounts? If you have PS or AC will you be able to adapt that to the new engine? (i.e. find the correct brackets) Do you need a new big block radiator? Individually these things are small but will add up to a considerable expense. I guess what I am saying is there will be a lot of other things that will come up if you do go for the 427 and just be prepared to deal with them.
 

hipo_p51

Member
Jun 13, 2008
199
2
19
Nov 3, 2008
#13
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #13
331.
super fun motor size.
lots and lots hp.
and the late model 302 is plenty strong.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Nov 3, 2008
#14
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #14
personally i would go with the 347, or better a 331. the 347 is a solid reliable combination as long as you take care of it like you would any engine. the second advantage of hte small block is in fact its lightweight. it does allow for a much better balanced package if you like to carve corners, like i do. that 427 i one heavy chuck of iron and parts are getting harder to find, and more expensive when you do find them. the third advantage of the small block is fuel economy. if you plan on driving this car on a regular basis, i think you will enjoy getting 15mpg around town as opposed to 5mpg. your choice though.
 
S

SNAKEPILOT

New Member
Jul 8, 2005
112
0
0
Nov 3, 2008
#15
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #15
68EFIvert said:
+1 and the fact the car will go around corners better with the lighter engine. Good luck on the decision. A real 427 would be hard to turn down.
Click to expand...

Steve McQueen didn't seem to have any problems throwing his FE equipped Mustang around corners in Bullitt.


alexb_ said:
I would go with the 347, or 331 if you're worried about reliability.
Click to expand...

How is a non-original bore and stroke combination going to be more reliable than a factory one?


View attachment 293157
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Nov 3, 2008
#16
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #16
SNAKEPILOT said:
Steve McQueen didn't seem to have any problems throwing his FE equipped Mustang around corners in Bullitt.

It was good for the movie that the car had a 390. If it had a nicely built small block the chace would not have been nearly as long. That would have been that 1% of the time the lighter small block would have made a difference.
Click to expand...
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Nov 3, 2008
#17
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #17
If money is no object, go ahead and do the FE. If you are a mortal, and don't have money tree, do the small block.
 
B

Buckhunter125@h

New Member
Jul 18, 2008
44
0
0
illinois
Nov 3, 2008
#18
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #18
"personally i would go with the 347, or better a 331"

why do you prefer 331 over 347 ???
 
T

thekid760

New Member
Sep 10, 2006
114
0
0
Nov 3, 2008
#19
  • Nov 3, 2008
  • #19
http://forums.stangnet.com/719569-302-stroker-information.html

I think he's refering to the old problem with the 347's and the piston pin intersecting the oil ring, which is why the 331 was created. This created excessive oil consumption and reduced engine life (not a 100,000 mile engine).

With new 347 as long as you have one with a 5.315 rod and not the 5.4 inch rod, the previous issue is not a problem anymore.


I vote for the 331 or 347 and sell the 427.

Generally speaking;
Lighter = faster w/ better fuel economy.
 

Z06killinSBF

Member
Apr 25, 2005
457
1
19
McKinney, TX
Nov 4, 2008
#20
  • Nov 4, 2008
  • #20
Sell all the 302 stuff and get a 460. You can build a mild 460 to make 500hp + for cheap. I would but I have to keep my shock towers. Then you can save the 427 and charge admission fees for people to come see it since by the looks of things, is precious. I laugh at people who complain of "wearing out" a motor like that. How many miles do you truly put on that thing? I think it would take atleast 20 years to "wear it out". Just a thought. I live by the 99% rule.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
1970 Boss block
  • Sparky714
  • Dec 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
619
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 7, 2024
FastDriver
Who the hell puts the wrong spark plugs in a 3.8L?
  • snowstang
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
368
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
LILCBRA
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
670
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
712
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?