• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

347 stroker questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter dadslx
  • Start date Start date Dec 14, 2007
D

dadslx

Member
Nov 11, 2006
59
0
6
Dec 14, 2007
#1
  • Dec 14, 2007
  • #1
hey guys after much thinking im just going to get my bottom end redone right now. i do however have a few questions. mainly will my injectors be ok for a 347 with a stcok top end?. and will i see any improvements in power from just the bottom end work? thanks folks
 
I

irish

New Member
Oct 18, 2006
168
0
0
Florida
Dec 14, 2007
#2
  • Dec 14, 2007
  • #2
details

More specifics needed to answer that, what size are your injectors, what heads/intake/cam?
 
D

dadslx

Member
Nov 11, 2006
59
0
6
Dec 14, 2007
#3
  • Dec 14, 2007
  • #3
specs

sorry basically its stock. 19lbs injector stock cam,intake and heads. 'm redoing the bottom because of some rod knock and figured what the heck since its getting pulled apart anyway why not stroke it. but i'm trying to figure out if thats possiable and would i notice any gains from the kit.
 

faststang90

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2007
522
16
49
baytown texas
Dec 14, 2007
#4
  • Dec 14, 2007
  • #4
up grad

i would not waste and money on doing a 347 till you have money for heads, cam, intake, inj
 

Killer50stang

New Member
May 11, 2004
632
0
0
Dec 15, 2007
#5
  • Dec 15, 2007
  • #5
faststang90 said:
i would not waste and money on doing a 347 till you have money for heads, cam, intake, inj
Click to expand...


These kits alone are over $800 just so you know. I doubt it would right with a stock top end.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 15, 2007
#6
  • Dec 15, 2007
  • #6
Typically, I would factor in $800 for one of the base kits and then factor in $1000 for machining, give or take.

You will see a gain. You can then add the heads, cam, and intake later and open up the airflow. The 347 will be severly restricted, but if you are going to do a rebuild, might as well do a 347.

I would suggest the 1.175" compression height piston and the 5.315" rod.

Your 19 lb injectors will be fine until you upgrade the heads, cam, and intake.
 
D

dadslx

Member
Nov 11, 2006
59
0
6
Dec 15, 2007
#7
  • Dec 15, 2007
  • #7
!!

well im going to add in a mass conversion with 32lbs injectors w/ performer rpm heads and a matched cam. down the road im going to upgrade the intake to most likely a tfs track heat. thanks for the help i will let you know in two weeks when the cars done!!!!
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Dec 16, 2007
#8
  • Dec 16, 2007
  • #8
in stock top end form it will pull stumps till about 5,000 then drastically run outta steam but if you build a good one it will make a good building block for the future
 

bubba-dough

Active Member
Dec 28, 2004
1,044
2
38
Indiana
Dec 17, 2007
#9
  • Dec 17, 2007
  • #9
do the stroker. then upgrade as the $$ comes in. if you need a rebuild you mine as well build a good foundation. i remember 5.0 mag did a article several yrs ago with exactly what you are describing and the motor made about 40-45hp more than the worn out stocker (remember you are gaining 45 cubes). all of your stock parts will work fine for it (other than choking the crap out of it, lol).

chp sells a kit for about $800 then add about $450 worth of machine shop work.
 

faststang90

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2007
522
16
49
baytown texas
Dec 21, 2007
#10
  • Dec 21, 2007
  • #10
doing a stroker

i know it cost money but i just think he would be better add heads, cam, intake before u stroke the motor. i know it cost money im in the middle of doing my car to a bbf 547 cu. i have a billet crank 2500.00, A 460 block 2200.00, A 460 heads2600.00, A 460 intake 620.00, rods 2500.00, pistons 1500.00. also add in all the other things i have not got i will have about 20,000 in just the motor. so i know it cost money Killer50stang
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 21, 2007
#11
  • Dec 21, 2007
  • #11
If he adds the stroke now, then he can add heads/cam/intake to match the added displacement later.
 

94mustangcobra

Member
Sep 29, 2006
126
0
16
Valdosta, GA
Dec 21, 2007
#12
  • Dec 21, 2007
  • #12
i went the route that you are questioning about, i bought a DSS 347 pro bullet w/ windage tray, 18cc dished pistons (9:1 compression) together with my stock self gasket matched gt40 heads and stock gasket matched cobra intake, lunati cam .500 intake/.510 exhaust and stock 1.7 crane roller rockers. 70mm TB, 80mm Pro-M mass air, 30 lb injectors w/ two fuel pumps because i run a zex 125 dry shot. here's my dyno sheets, my car also weighs with me around 3500+ lbs

this thread may be interesting to you, it compares stock LS1 to a 347 with 302 parts on top.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
Fox Good shop in Washington state or Oregon
  • keel
  • May 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
73
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2026
keel
351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
388
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 12, 2026
spencergt66
S
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
856
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?