• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351 c 2v to 4v head swap?

  • Thread starter Thread starter black95gts5.0
  • Start date Start date May 11, 2009
B

black95gts5.0

New Member
Jun 16, 2005
85
0
0
May 11, 2009
#1
  • May 11, 2009
  • #1
I have a running 351 cleveland 2bbl out of a 73 rideau 500 and was wondering if anyone knows what kind of compression that motor would have? (low I know) and if I put open chamber 4 bbl heads on this motor what would I have for compression? I would most likely cam it at the same time. would this be worth it or should I just build a proper bottom end? I am on a budget and a bit of a time crunch. thanks for taking the time.
 

70grande

Member
Feb 3, 2009
56
0
6
San Diego, CA, 92115
May 11, 2009
#2
  • May 11, 2009
  • #2
I've got that same engine! I also have a stock 4V intake manifold lying around that I would sell to you real cheap if you want it. It will need to be resurfaced though, let me know if you want any pictures. Good luck with the swap and I can't wait to see how it works out.
 
9

96 DOHC Cobra

Founding Member
Oct 14, 2001
542
0
16
Cerritos, CA
May 11, 2009
#3
  • May 11, 2009
  • #3
I think 73 was the first year 351Cs got a dished piston (both 4Vs and 2Vs) The compression ratio should be about 8.5:1 with either a 2V open chamber head or a 4V open chamber head.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
May 12, 2009
#4
  • May 12, 2009
  • #4
96 DOHC Cobra said:
I think 73 was the first year 351Cs got a dished piston (both 4Vs and 2Vs) The compression ratio should be about 8.5:1 with either a 2V open chamber head or a 4V open chamber head.
Click to expand...
That's right.

The 2V and 4V open chamber heads have the same size combustion chamber - that is if neither set of heads have ever been cut.
 
B

black95gts5.0

New Member
Jun 16, 2005
85
0
0
May 12, 2009
#5
  • May 12, 2009
  • #5
so if i get the heads cut I will bump compression up some. Is that a bad way to up the compression? would it be better to put better pistons in than cut the heads?
 
7

71stangfreak

New Member
Jul 14, 2005
6
0
0
Loganville, GA
May 12, 2009
#6
  • May 12, 2009
  • #6
I read somewhere, a long time ago, that the open chamber heads were much less prone to detonation, even with a domed piston, and the comb chamber shape was better for a more complete fuel burn. I dont know how much it costs to get the heads milled but If there was ever a possibility of putting it back the way it was, you wont want to mill the heads, other wise it would be much easier if you weren't doing a complete rebuild to just pull the heads and take them to the shop. If you already have it apart, I might lean towards changing pistons. Just my worthless $.02.
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
May 12, 2009
#7
  • May 12, 2009
  • #7
71stangfreak said:
I read somewhere, a long time ago, that the open chamber heads were much less prone to detonation, even with a domed piston, and the comb chamber shape was better for a more complete fuel burn. I dont know how much it costs to get the heads milled but If there was ever a possibility of putting it back the way it was, you wont want to mill the heads, other wise it would be much easier if you weren't doing a complete rebuild to just pull the heads and take them to the shop. If you already have it apart, I might lean towards changing pistons. Just my worthless $.02.
Click to expand...

Your memory is failing you. 4v closed chamber heads are more ping resistant because of the dove shape compression chamber in the cylinder head which means with the closed chamber you can get away with a little more compression all other things being equal.

The American 2v are all open chamber, you can get an Aussie 2v with the dove chamber which would bump the compression in the motor.

Regarding pistons versus head changing...the answer is "depends"

How much money you got, what you using the car for, and what is the performance goal you are trying to reach?
 

downwardspiral

New Member
Oct 27, 2008
51
0
0
Long Island, NY
May 12, 2009
#8
  • May 12, 2009
  • #8
dodgestang said:
Your memory is failing you. 4v closed chamber heads are more ping resistant because of the dove shape compression chamber in the cylinder head which means with the closed chamber you can get away with a little more compression all other things being equal.

The American 2v are all open chamber, you can get an Aussie 2v with the dove chamber which would bump the compression in the motor.

Regarding pistons versus head changing...the answer is "depends"

How much money you got, what you using the car for, and what is the performance goal you are trying to reach?
Click to expand...

best steel cleveland heads for street use!
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 13, 2009
#9
  • May 13, 2009
  • #9
71stangfreak said:
I read somewhere, a long time ago, that the open chamber heads were much less prone to detonation, even with a domed piston, and the comb chamber shape was better for a more complete fuel burn. I dont know how much it costs to get the heads milled but If there was ever a possibility of putting it back the way it was, you wont want to mill the heads, other wise it would be much easier if you weren't doing a complete rebuild to just pull the heads and take them to the shop. If you already have it apart, I might lean towards changing pistons. Just my worthless $.02.
Click to expand...

+2 on your memory failing you. Quench heads are what you want for ping resistence. The quench portion of the head tends to put out the fires of detonation. I built a 400 with milled open chamber heads and with only a 9.7 to 1 comp ratio, it wanted only 93 octane fuel to control the ping where a quench headed 390 with a 10.25 to 1 ratio gladly accepted 89 octane fuel.
 
7

71stangfreak

New Member
Jul 14, 2005
6
0
0
Loganville, GA
May 13, 2009
#10
  • May 13, 2009
  • #10
I did say it was a long time ago, my memory fails me all the time. Either that or the info had came from an incorrect source.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
217
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
627
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
S
Timing chain, guides and tensioner installation (Possible orientation in Intake Stroke)
  • StallionMax
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
384
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
StallionMax
S
F
Electrical Foxbody wiring harness 2.3 to v8 swap
  • Foxbodyjake
  • Mar 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
696
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 13, 2026
Foxbodyjake
F
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?