• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351 Windsor hp limit? head options?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1968-coupe
  • Start date Start date Oct 25, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
1

1968-coupe

New Member
Mar 28, 2010
131
0
0
Deep East Texas
Oct 25, 2010
#1
  • Oct 25, 2010
  • #1
I found a great deal on a 351 windsor engine (disassembled, $100) Im mainly interested in the block, which had a piston crack so it will need to be bored (its factory bore now)

What is the HP limit that a factory 351 block can handle? Is it more than that of a stock 302? I may end up building this 351 block up if it can safely handle 500hp.

Also would I see more power with a good set of 351 Cleveland heads on it or are there 351W heads that will flow just as well?
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Oct 25, 2010
#2
  • Oct 25, 2010
  • #2
Ford now sells a 427 c.i.d. version of the 351W, you could probably study that engine for ideas. And while it's possible to install 351C heads on a Windsor, it's an uneccesary PITA.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Oct 25, 2010
#3
  • Oct 25, 2010
  • #3
A windsor block will take well over 500. I think 850 is more like it for a 351w if you don't rattle it.
 
1

1968-coupe

New Member
Mar 28, 2010
131
0
0
Deep East Texas
Oct 25, 2010
#4
  • Oct 25, 2010
  • #4
Im really wanting to come in around the 500 mark. I gave up on the 302 after being told that 450 is its limit for a stock block. Im REALLY into the Clevors, its different. Still new to me though. I wanted to build a cleveland but after stumbling on this I may go the Clevor route.

What do I do about headers for a 68 coupe running Cleveland heads? Will 1970 headers work?
 
6

65coupe408w

Member
Mar 26, 2010
192
0
16
Oct 26, 2010
#5
  • Oct 26, 2010
  • #5
build a 408w stroker with 10.5:1 compression good set of heads and a custom grind cam and 500hp on pump gas will be pretty easy.
 

Wicked65

Member
Aug 10, 2003
490
3
19
NORCAL
Oct 26, 2010
#6
  • Oct 26, 2010
  • #6
Typically, if you dont rev over 6500ish, 600 at the crank is the "safe" limit. Plenty of people make more then that, so its not like it cant be done. But thats kinda my personal Limit on the subject. Note if you do a zero balance, lightweight internals, debur block....ect it might be able to take more.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 26, 2010
#7
  • Oct 26, 2010
  • #7
like the other said, as long as you keep the revs below 6500, the stock windsor block can handle well over 500hp, the upper limit being around 700hp or so.

as for heads, the cleveland heads can certainly be put on the 351w block, and they look cool imo, but there are plenty of better choices these days that are direct bolt ons without having to find clevor intakes, and do some machine work on the heads to make them work properly. for a 500hp motor, i would drop on a set of world products windsor sr heads, either cast iron(on a budget), or aluminum, or any of the other aftermarket heads with an intake runner of at least 200cc.
 
1

1968-coupe

New Member
Mar 28, 2010
131
0
0
Deep East Texas
Oct 27, 2010
#8
  • Oct 27, 2010
  • #8
I like the Clevor idea, I really wanted to build a Cheveland engine, but stumbling across this windsor got me thinking Clevor. As for the intake Edlebrock makes one, and there are a large vriety of Cleveland heads that will work great for the clevor. I have played around with 302s for a while now so im tired of that and looking for something different, like a cleveland.

What headers work in a 68?
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Oct 27, 2010
#9
  • Oct 27, 2010
  • #9
I have never heard of a windsor block cracking below 800hp. I also think that World Product sbf heads are probably some of the worst non Ford heads made. A clevor does have some cool factor, but they are not cheap or easy. Cleveland heads can make great power too, but the ports are big for what they flow. You could fool most people by putting Cleveland shaped valve covers on windsor heads. That would also get rid of the head ache of trying to get pistons and headers with out giving up performance. Headers might not be a problem since the C and W blocks have such similar deck heights, but when dealing with large primary tubes and shock towers there is very little room for error. I would not be surprised if a clever ended up costing $2000 more to build.
 
1

1968-coupe

New Member
Mar 28, 2010
131
0
0
Deep East Texas
Oct 27, 2010
#10
  • Oct 27, 2010
  • #10
I have never heard of a windsor block cracking below 800hp. I also think that World Product sbf heads are probably some of the worst non Ford heads made. A clevor does have some cool factor, but they are not cheap or easy. Cleveland heads can make great power too, but the ports are big for what they flow. You could fool most people by putting Cleveland shaped valve covers on windsor heads. That would also get rid of the head ache of trying to get pistons and headers with out giving up performance. Headers might not be a problem since the C and W blocks have such similar deck heights, but when dealing with large primary tubes and shock towers there is very little room for error. I would not be surprised if a clever ended up costing $2000 more to build.
Click to expand...

$2,000? Seriously? I was expecting to spend $7-8,000 on just the engine.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Oct 27, 2010
#11
  • Oct 27, 2010
  • #11
The cost of the windsor + $2000 = clevor cost.
 
1

1968-coupe

New Member
Mar 28, 2010
131
0
0
Deep East Texas
Oct 27, 2010
#12
  • Oct 27, 2010
  • #12
Im picking up a Windsor this weekend. As for the build im only using the block, olus:
SCAT rotating assembly = $2,000
Truckflow 190 Clevland heads = $2,000
plus everything else I will need, Cam, intake, and 750 Holley 4bbl will make that $5,000 plus everything else the engine requires. Total tag is between $7-8,000.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Oct 27, 2010
#13
  • Oct 27, 2010
  • #13
I'v always been told that 700HP is the safe limit for the 351W block. But many seem to have had luck running more than that.
 

ashford

Member
Dec 19, 2003
485
0
16
fargo ND
Oct 27, 2010
#14
  • Oct 27, 2010
  • #14
ForceFed70 said:
I'v always been told that 700HP is the safe limit for the 351W block. But many seem to have had luck running more than that.
Click to expand...

it depends on the years. 69-72 blocks have seen 1000hp on turbo low rpms,
73-83 are the weakest but still way better than 302.
83 ho to whenever they stoped are the next most desirable and the roller blocks are midgrade- there are alot of 700hp turbo roller blocks
 
1

1968-coupe

New Member
Mar 28, 2010
131
0
0
Deep East Texas
Oct 27, 2010
#15
  • Oct 27, 2010
  • #15
It may be next weekend before I can pick this one up. I will post the casting numbers. It came out of an early 80s F150 hotrod. mild cam, punched .030 over (it had a piston crack it will need to be bored again) Edlebrock intake, it had a Holley 750 on it. Not sure what head work was done. Im getting the entire dieassembled engine so if anyone is looking for parts i will be selling what I dont need. I will probably end up using just the block.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Oct 28, 2010
#16
  • Oct 28, 2010
  • #16
brianj5600 said:
I have never heard of a windsor block cracking below 800hp. I also think that World Product sbf heads are probably some of the worst non Ford heads made. A clevor does have some cool factor, but they are not cheap or easy. Cleveland heads can make great power too, but the ports are big for what they flow. You could fool most people by putting Cleveland shaped valve covers on windsor heads. That would also get rid of the head ache of trying to get pistons and headers with out giving up performance. Headers might not be a problem since the C and W blocks have such similar deck heights, but when dealing with large primary tubes and shock towers there is very little room for error. I would not be surprised if a clever ended up costing $2000 more to build.
Click to expand...

X2

I'd either go AFR 205's or some TFS HiPorts. Personally I'd do the hiports just because you can go much further down the road than with the afr's.

If your stuck on a clevor setup, I'd do some C3 heads and ditch the heavy ass cast iron deal.
 
6

68RCodeConv

New Member
Oct 2, 2003
345
0
0
Houston, TX
Oct 28, 2010
#17
  • Oct 28, 2010
  • #17
500 hp out of 351 cubic inches is doable but I'm not sure how drivable it will be. You are talking about a pretty radical cam that probably won't make much vacuum and the idle quality won't be very good. Plus below 2500 it will not pull great.

In my 347 (worked Dart Pro 1 heads) I had a 240/249 duration at 050 cam with 108 LSA and .570 lift. 4 inches of vacuum, would not idle below 1100, did not smooth out until 2000 rpm. It did not make anywhere near 500 hp. It was an awful combo in urban driving.
 
1

1968-coupe

New Member
Mar 28, 2010
131
0
0
Deep East Texas
Oct 28, 2010
#18
  • Oct 28, 2010
  • #18
blown65 said:
X2

I'd either go AFR 205's or some TFS HiPorts. Personally I'd do the hiports just because you can go much further down the road than with the afr's.

If your stuck on a clevor setup, I'd do some C3 heads and ditch the heavy ass cast iron deal.
Click to expand...

Im going with aluminum Trick flows most likely.

500 hp out of 351 cubic inches is doable but I'm not sure how drivable it will be. You are talking about a pretty radical cam that probably won't make much vacuum and the idle quality won't be very good. Plus below 2500 it will not pull great.

In my 347 (worked Dart Pro 1 heads) I had a 240/249 duration at 050 cam with 108 LSA and .570 lift. 4 inches of vacuum, would not idle below 1100, did not smooth out until 2000 rpm. It did not make anywhere near 500 hp. It was an awful combo in urban driving.
Click to expand...

That had worried me, The thing abour the clevor is that its not making power below 1500 RPMs in even a mild build. I LOVE a lumpy idle, but I guess I will have to experiment and find a happy medium between performance and drivability. I can always shange the cams out and go milder.
 

BuckeyeDemon

Member
Apr 13, 2010
130
9
19
Cincinnati, OH
Oct 28, 2010
#19
  • Oct 28, 2010
  • #19
i have TFS high ports in a 69 mustang with a 351W block.

fitting the headers was a major PITA. i relocated the clutch linkage, completely cut two primaries and rerouted by welding mandrel bends.

and i'm only using 1 3/4" long tubes.

if you decide to go with TFS then consider the TW's instead. Unless you don't mind some fab work.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Oct 28, 2010
#20
  • Oct 28, 2010
  • #20
68RCodeConv said:
500 hp out of 351 cubic inches is doable but I'm not sure how drivable it will be. You are talking about a pretty radical cam that probably won't make much vacuum and the idle quality won't be very good. Plus below 2500 it will not pull great.

In my 347 (worked Dart Pro 1 heads) I had a 240/249 duration at 050 cam with 108 LSA and .570 lift. 4 inches of vacuum, would not idle below 1100, did not smooth out until 2000 rpm. It did not make anywhere near 500 hp. It was an awful combo in urban driving.
Click to expand...


Sounds like you had a screwed up combo TBO. My cam is much bigger than that and I can even get mine to idle just fine at 1000. Of course its still pretty rough up around 2000. 270'sI/280'sE and 700+lift.

I would think someone doing a 351 from scratch would at least do a 408 stroker in it. With the inexpensive kits out there now at least.

You could do a very streetable build out of a 408 and make 550-600hp without hardly trying. Just takes some of the right parts and the right camshaft. I learned my mistakes by listening to people that knew nothing about performance Fords and started looking at what ppl were doing with them to make them go fast. Go check out some of the builds on hardcore50 dot com and you will get some ideas of what can be done. Quite a few very fast street cars with street friendly builds.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
198
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
504
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
683
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
759
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?