• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351 Windsor hp limit? head options?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1968-coupe
  • Start date Start date Oct 25, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Oct 29, 2010
#21
  • Oct 29, 2010
  • #21
1968-coupe said:
It may be next weekend before I can pick this one up. I will post the casting numbers. It came out of an early 80s F150 hotrod. mild cam, punched .030 over (it had a piston crack it will need to be bored again) Edlebrock intake, it had a Holley 750 on it. Not sure what head work was done. Im getting the entire dieassembled engine so if anyone is looking for parts i will be selling what I dont need. I will probably end up using just the block.
Click to expand...

For how common 351W blocks are I would recommend you stay away from something that's already 0.030" over and needs to be bored again.

You should be able to find a std bore block no problem.

I agree with above posts that Clevor isn't as cheap as building a Windsor, depending on exactly how you go. I'm building a Cleveland because that's what I like, not because it's cheapest. However, I'm using a set of 4V closed chamber heads with aftermarket double springs, 1 pc SST valves, fresh valve job, new seals, etc. that I paid $350 for. Edit: they also include guide plates and screw in studs and all that machine work is already done. They might be heavy old and cast iron, but they will support 500+ horse power and were very inexpensive. You aren't going to find that with a 351W.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 29, 2010
#22
  • Oct 29, 2010
  • #22
68RCodeConv said:
500 hp out of 351 cubic inches is doable but I'm not sure how drivable it will be. You are talking about a pretty radical cam that probably won't make much vacuum and the idle quality won't be very good. Plus below 2500 it will not pull great.

In my 347 (worked Dart Pro 1 heads) I had a 240/249 duration at 050 cam with 108 LSA and .570 lift. 4 inches of vacuum, would not idle below 1100, did not smooth out until 2000 rpm. It did not make anywhere near 500 hp. It was an awful combo in urban driving.
Click to expand...

500hp from a streetable 351w is fairly easy with the right combination. modern heads and cam designs means you dont have to put up with a lumpy idling engine that overheats every time you get stuck in traffic.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 29, 2010
#23
  • Oct 29, 2010
  • #23
Hack said:
For how common 351W blocks are I would recommend you stay away from something that's already 0.030" over and needs to be bored again.

You should be able to find a std bore block no problem.

I agree with above posts that Clevor isn't as cheap as building a Windsor, depending on exactly how you go. I'm building a Cleveland because that's what I like, not because it's cheapest. However, I'm using a set of 4V closed chamber heads with aftermarket double springs, 1 pc SST valves, fresh valve job, new seals, etc. that I paid $350 for. Edit: they also include guide plates and screw in studs and all that machine work is already done. They might be heavy old and cast iron, but they will support 500+ horse power and were very inexpensive. You aren't going to find that with a 351W.
Click to expand...

hack, if this were 30 years ago, i would agree with you that building a cleveland over a windsor if you wanted a lot of power was the way to go. but these days, both can be built to make a lot of power on similar budgets. the only advantage the cleveland holds these days is that it revs quicker that the windsor does.
 
J

j69302

Active Member
Jan 31, 2006
325
1
29
Oct 30, 2010
#24
  • Oct 30, 2010
  • #24
rbohm said:
hack, if this were 30 years ago, i would agree with you that building a cleveland over a windsor if you wanted a lot of power was the way to go. but these days, both can be built to make a lot of power on similar budgets. the only advantage the cleveland holds these days is that it revs quicker that the windsor does.
Click to expand...

what makes a cleveland rev faster? and are you talking about an actual cleveland or a clevor now?
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 30, 2010
#25
  • Oct 30, 2010
  • #25
j69302 said:
what makes a cleveland rev faster? and are you talking about an actual cleveland or a clevor now?
Click to expand...

the cleveland has smaller main bearing journals than the windsor does. 2.75" vs 3". that alone allows for less friction. the other thing the smaller main journals allow for is a lighter rotating assembly.
 

BuckeyeDemon

Member
Apr 13, 2010
130
9
19
Cincinnati, OH
Oct 30, 2010
#26
  • Oct 30, 2010
  • #26
rbohm said:
the cleveland has smaller main bearing journals than the windsor does. 2.75" vs 3". that alone allows for less friction. the other thing the smaller main journals allow for is a lighter rotating assembly.
Click to expand...

i would highly doubt a person could notice a cleveland rev faster given two similar builds.

according to Scat's website for their 4340 forged cranks:

3.5" Cleveland: 56 lbs
3.5" Windsor: 58 lbs

4.0" Cleveland: 58 lbs
4.0" Windsor: 58 lbs

seems like a wash to me for a street motor.

but i'm not that knowledgeable in the topic.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Oct 30, 2010
#27
  • Oct 30, 2010
  • #27
Especially when the weight is so near the center. I would not hinge a decision on that. If you want a Cleveland, build one. There are a few things that can trip you up, but nothing major.
 
1

1968-coupe

New Member
Mar 28, 2010
131
0
0
Deep East Texas
Oct 30, 2010
#28
  • Oct 30, 2010
  • #28
I like the Windsor block, but I like the Cleveland heads. Im going for an old school hotrod, very close to stock interior, Mag500 wheels, Shelby decklid, 67 shelby hood. From what I understand the Clevor was an old way to get a performance engine from what you had, but the Cleveland heads on the windsor block. Who knows, I may use cast iron Cleveland heads. Power isnt everything, there will always be someone getting more power out of their small block than you are. Im looking for something that will make an oldschool powerplant that will be different, unique and fun. The fact that the Clevor setup isnt popular anymore draws me to it, it takes more thought than bolt on and go. Im going for old school (with just a little new stuff mixed in with it)
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Oct 30, 2010
#29
  • Oct 30, 2010
  • #29
There is nothing wrong with a C block for what you are doing.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
206
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
589
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
716
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
804
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?