• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

351C Engine Swap

  • Thread starter Thread starter NosMe200
  • Start date Start date Dec 31, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
N

NosMe200

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
6
0
2
Worcester, MA
Dec 31, 2006
#1
  • Dec 31, 2006
  • #1
Hey I got an '84 GT with the carberated 302 in it. I know where I can get my hands on a 351 Cleveland engine for $400. I'm considering the swap, but would like some feedback to help me on my decision. I'm rebuilding my engine in the spring, so whichever engine I go with will get a rebuild and modded up a bit. Please let me know what you think, 302 vs. 351C in my '84 GT 5-speed, thanks. Btw, I do want to keep my car a stick, so this is another concern...I know most of the 351's were autos...
 
7

71swing

Member
Aug 18, 2006
199
0
17
Omaha,NE
Dec 31, 2006
#2
  • Dec 31, 2006
  • #2
I have a 351c backed by a toploader.

Are you talking about a 2valve or a 4valve 351c. Because i don't think the 2v would be worth the effort.
 

89streetbeast

New Member
Dec 4, 2006
365
1
0
horton,ks
Dec 31, 2006
#3
  • Dec 31, 2006
  • #3
Cleveland and 351&400M motors have potential if built right. yea they are heavy but with a little bit of work they are torque monsters. only thing major you would need is headers. you either have them custom made or run the stock car log style cast manifolds. old friend i knew had a 400M in his 86, only thing i know that he did was exhaust mods, dunno if he had to fabricate motor mounts or a tranny Xmember.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Jan 1, 2007
#4
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #4
your T5 is not going to work with that motor.....so get a toploader or a c4/c6 behind it. I started doing a swap like this on my 88 but it really is not worth the effort! You can make just as good of power with your 302
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Jan 1, 2007
#5
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #5
that's an old outdated motor that likely won't be compatible which much at all, and will cost you an arm and a leg in the long run.

IMO, grab a roller 94+ 5.8 351 windsor block from a bronco/f150 and go with that, then you'll have the entire aftermarket that you can use on it.
 
9

95GTAODE

New Member
Nov 25, 2004
200
2
0
Jan 1, 2007
#6
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #6
The T5 will work with a 351C, but I'd seriously look at an aftermarket box like a TKO, Liberty or Gforce... A healthy 4V Clev will eat stock T5's for lunch.

Hooker and Hedman both make swap headers for a Cleveland in a fox, and the swap oilpan is available from both Canton and Moroso. For motor mounts you can re-use your stochers if they're in good shape.

As for being "outdated", Clevelands are still banned from a lot of racing classes (They embarassed Chevy owners on a regular basis), add a decent cam, aluminum intake and a 750 Holley to a healthy and otherwise stock 351C 4V and you'll have an 7000 RPM + screamer that will chew up most HCI 302 and 351W's out there.
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Jan 1, 2007
#7
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #7
v8only said:
that's an old outdated motor that likely won't be compatible which much at all, and will cost you an arm and a leg in the long run.

IMO, grab a roller 94+ 5.8 351 windsor block from a bronco/f150 and go with that, then you'll have the entire aftermarket that you can use on it.
Click to expand...


Learn more about Clevelands before you give "advice" about them, you just pulled a ryan with that comment.
 
I

importhater5.0

New Member
May 15, 2003
94
0
0
West Chester, Pa
Jan 1, 2007
#8
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #8
my one good friend has an 89 hatch that has a 351 cleveland in. He has a set of Yates aluminum heads, and a cam somewhere in the upper .500" lift, i cant remember the intake he had, but it looked like a Victor Junior Style intake. He had a 750 Demon Carb on it and an MSD dist. and 6AL ign. He is running 4.88 gears and he had a toploader in it first, and blew it up. THen the next time at the track, blew the rear. THen he ordered Tremec TKO 3550 and made the car a 5 spd. It hasnt had any problems for about 75 passes at the track, and the motor was not bored, stroked, and absolutely no power adders with full interior and just 90/10 struts. On street slicks he runs 11.30s all day long with that motor, and he shifts it right a 7000rpm. We tore the motor apart about a month ago cause hes now building a 408 stroker, but we wanted to check the internals out and the cylinder walls and everything look spanking new. But ya know how that gets, 11s arent good enough now, so thats why the stroker is goin in. BUt its a very stout engine, and that engine has probably over 75 passes, and TONS of street racing time on it. Just thought i would add some info to this thread cause there isnt many people runnin clevelands out there, and if you still cant find out what you need let me know, cause i will call my buddy and get a list for you! We put that motor in about 4 yrs ago, so i cant remember all we did, but i know we did drop the engine cradle a bit. BUt let me know if you need that list! good luck
 
E

eric88gt

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2000
163
0
16
Chisholm, MN
Jan 1, 2007
#9
  • Jan 1, 2007
  • #9
Before answering the question as to what would be the better motor, we'd really need to know the ultimate goals for the car, is it a daily driver with occasional track use, or a weekend warrior?And also whether the 351c in question is a 2v or 4v. And fwiw a 2v cleveland is still TOTALLY worth building... How's 412 hp and 424 torque with stock 2v heads, intake, and through a 500cfm holley 2bbl sound? (at the motor mind you)
 
S

seijirou

Founding Member
Aug 15, 2002
2,417
4
48
DFW
Jan 2, 2007
#10
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #10
eric88gt said:
And fwiw a 2v cleveland is still TOTALLY worth building... How's 412 hp and 424 torque with stock 2v heads, intake, and through a 500cfm holley 2bbl sound? (at the motor mind you)
Click to expand...

Wow, that sounds like I want to know what else was in there to manage that one?
These weren't quench heads?
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,597
223
Northern KY
Jan 2, 2007
#11
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #11
A 4V Cleveland is a nasty engine....it'll put any equally built Windsor to shame...the problem is price and part availability, not to mention the availability of the engine itself. For those who are knocking Clevelands, you should have a look at a 4V Cleveland head sometime...they're a work of art.

Oh, it was also the engine of choice for the DeTomosa Pantera..

 

Attachments

  • 1972-DeTomaso-Pantera-Engine-Bay-351-Cleveland-st.webp
    226.5 KB · Views: 1,433
S

seijirou

Founding Member
Aug 15, 2002
2,417
4
48
DFW
Jan 2, 2007
#12
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #12
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
A 4V Cleveland is a nasty engine....it'll put any equally built Windsor to shame...the problem is price and part availability, not to mention the availability of the engine itself. For those who are knocking Clevelands, you should have a look at a 4V Cleveland head sometime...they're a work of art.

Oh, it was also the engine of choice for the DeTomosa Pantera..
Click to expand...

I've been drooling over building an EFI cleveland headed windsor for years now, I just can't scrape up the means to make it happen.
 
I

importhater5.0

New Member
May 15, 2003
94
0
0
West Chester, Pa
Jan 2, 2007
#13
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #13
YEa thats what my buddy with the 408 stroker is doing. He had that 351C in his hatch like i said in my previous reply, but hes doing the 351W block, stroked to a 408, withe his Yates Aluminum Cleveland heads. Its still gonna be carbed, but its a sick setup!
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,597
223
Northern KY
Jan 2, 2007
#14
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #14
So you're talking about a Clever? LOL, Windsor with Cleveland head...that's an old school setup they used to do before there were Windsor heads that could flow as much as the Clevelands.

It can be said that you can make as much power with the right Windsor setup...sure, but the cool factor is nowhere near as high. If you wanna make power and have a really unique setup, build a Cleveland.
 

89streetbeast

New Member
Dec 4, 2006
365
1
0
horton,ks
Jan 2, 2007
#15
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #15
or stick cleveland heads on a 400M thats what my old 79 4x4 had and it ran like a raped ape. course i put a nice healthy cam and intake/carb setup on it lol.
 
E

eric88gt

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2000
163
0
16
Chisholm, MN
Jan 2, 2007
#16
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #16
seijirou said:
Wow, that sounds like I want to know what else was in there to manage that one?
These weren't quench heads?
Click to expand...

Nope, they took the aussie heads away from us, they were open chamber 2v heads, shaved more than anybody ever thought would work. It's a .030 over 351 c, stock block, crank, rods, solid cam (custom grind) stock intake, no port work on the heads, 500 holley 2bbl, going to 1 5/8 headers, non stepped. That particular motor ended up at about 13.7:1 IIRC. I'll be going back with some new headers and even more compression in the next 2-3 weeks if everything works out. You should see the look on the chevy guys when a $3500 ford yanks their $8000 chevy down the straights. Talk about whiners...
 

thegabrielles

Member
Feb 26, 2003
516
1
16
Atlanta Georgia
Jan 2, 2007
#17
  • Jan 2, 2007
  • #17
As a former owner of a "clevor" or street boss 302 I can tell you it was one heck of a street set up, but lacked big time torque for track runs. I have run many motors over the years and the clevelands are great motors but compared to the windsors they are more expensive.

For me its not worth the trade off not to easily but parts for my car, windsor motors and parts are easy to find and the swap to a 351 windsor is easy.

By the way, my Clevor ran 13.14 at 106 at the track in a 3600lb car, thats with street tires through the exaust, and I had just driven the car 500 miles to the track and got 22 mpg.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Jan 3, 2007
#18
  • Jan 3, 2007
  • #18
i have a whole 4v cleveland motor sitting in my garage if you are interested in parts
 
S

smr

Member
Nov 14, 2005
167
0
16
Nor*Cal (Vacaville)
Jan 3, 2007
#19
  • Jan 3, 2007
  • #19
I am running an aus 2V headed cleveland in my 90 fox GT. w/ C4..the cleveland I rebuilt was out of a friends 86 fox and had us 2v heads, custom headers, canton pan, stock engine mounts, performer intake and a 650DP holley. He ran in the 12s with a stock T5 on 15" street tires (bald) and it wa a t-top car with stock suspension. Now Im running about 12:1 compression and a custom grind solid cam..a similar combo just came out of my machine shop and dynoed at over 400 rwhp...I think cleveland is good setup. Parts are becoming more available again from australia...a good 2v setup makes for mean street driver...and uses almost all stock fox stuff for swap..you need headers and rear sump ooil pan kit (canton or moroso and Headman for the exhaust) I say go for it...
 
S

seijirou

Founding Member
Aug 15, 2002
2,417
4
48
DFW
Jan 4, 2007
#20
  • Jan 4, 2007
  • #20
eric88gt said:
Nope, they took the aussie heads away from us, they were open chamber 2v heads, shaved more than anybody ever thought would work. It's a .030 over 351 c, stock block, crank, rods, solid cam (custom grind) stock intake, no port work on the heads, 500 holley 2bbl, going to 1 5/8 headers, non stepped. That particular motor ended up at about 13.7:1 IIRC. I'll be going back with some new headers and even more compression in the next 2-3 weeks if everything works out. You should see the look on the chevy guys when a $3500 ford yanks their $8000 chevy down the straights. Talk about whiners...
Click to expand...

Wow.
What kind of pistons? Do they have any special design? And what fuel are you running? I've always understood that the 2v heads are prone to detonation because there is no quench area. I've had thoughts about a custom dome piston that would create a quench effect but I don't know what that would do to compression. With 13.7:1 though I wonder if you have something like that type of piston in there.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
591
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
H
Drivetrain 6R80 to t56 swap
  • Holymoses
  • Apr 25, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
167
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
L
New here from Maine
  • lobster
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
442
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 5, 2026
lobster
L
F
Electrical Foxbody wiring harness 2.3 to v8 swap
  • Foxbodyjake
  • Mar 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
596
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 13, 2026
Foxbodyjake
F
G
Fox engine swaps
  • Gravity
  • Aug 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
337
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 12, 2025
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?