• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351m/400 engine???

  • Thread starter Thread starter A67StangMaster
  • Start date Start date May 25, 2005

A67StangMaster

New Member
May 4, 2005
401
0
0
San Jose CA
May 25, 2005
#1
  • May 25, 2005
  • #1
I got a 351m/400 engine out of a 78 ranchro gt dose anyone know anything about this engine?
How dose it compare to the 351c?
could you fit it into a 67 coupe?
can you make it a proformace engine?
I found some stuff on it but not a hole lot?
 
G

Gud T.B. Blown

Member
Dec 9, 2004
583
1
18
May 25, 2005
#2
  • May 25, 2005
  • #2
A67StangMaster said:
I got a 351m/400 engine out of a 78 ranchro gt dose anyone know anything about this engine?
How dose it compare to the 351c?
could you fit it into a 67 coupe?
can you make it a proformace engine?
I found some stuff on it but not a hole lot?
Click to expand...


is it a 400 or a 351M, there's a big difference. the 400 is a taller decked version of the 351C. the heads will interchange as will pistons and cams. the intakes won't interchange because the valley is wider. you can build a performance motor but your options will be limited. stay away from the 351M. your best bet is to find a 351C block and build that instead.
 

yeloxr7

Member
Apr 18, 2005
429
0
16
May 25, 2005
#3
  • May 25, 2005
  • #3
You will also need a transmission from a 351M/400 application. They have a different bell housing pattern from a small-block or 351C.
 

67P51

New Member
May 2, 2005
29
0
2
May 25, 2005
#4
  • May 25, 2005
  • #4
351c/m/400

I have a 351C in my 67. Fits OK, but with an M having 1/2 inch taller deck height, and thus wider, look out for real tight access to plugs,headers,etc.
351M is a destroked 400 block.
As stated above, performance parts are limited and not cheap.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
May 26, 2005
#5
  • May 26, 2005
  • #5
67P51 said:
I have a 351C in my 67. Fits OK, but with an M having 1/2 inch taller deck height, and thus wider, look out for real tight access to plugs,headers,etc.
351M is a destroked 400 block.
As stated above, performance parts are limited and not cheap.
Click to expand...

actually the 351m/400 block is 1.1" taller than the 351c block (10.3 vs 9.2). as for performance parts, cams are the same as the 351c, as are rocker arms, and valves. pistons are different only in deck hieght, but are available. intakes are the problems, but again they are available at a reasonable price, BUT you wont find any victor jr intakes or stuff like that as these engines are designed more for low end grunt than high rpm power. you can build a 351m/400 for reasonable money and make around 400hp with a 400(for the 351m just get a 400 crank and pistons, use the 351m rods and block) for around $2k. this engine however will be a snug fit in a 67-70 mustang, much like a 460 would be. you will however have to make headers for the swap as the aftermarket is thin on things like that for the 400. too bad too because it is a good engine for the street.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
May 26, 2005
#6
  • May 26, 2005
  • #6
Alot of the main points have been covered already, but.....

-The 351M/400 has 429 engine mount and bellhousing patterns; the 351C has 302 mount/bell

-Aside from the taller deck height, the M/400 has 3" main bearings; C has 2.749".

-You can put a 351C intake on a M/400 if you get intake spacer plates. They are still readily available.

You can make a 400 into a stout performer, but many would argue that a 351C is money better spent. I have heard many times that the 400 is a great truck engine with lots of torque
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
561
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
122
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
583
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
285
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
244
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?