• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

351W block needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter "REPLIMOD" #17
  • Start date Start date Aug 6, 2003

"REPLIMOD" #17

New Member
Feb 21, 2003
101
0
0
Foothills of SC
Aug 6, 2003
#1
  • Aug 6, 2003
  • #1
My body work and paint is nearly complete. Now I need to find a good 351W block and a tremec 3550. I am going to be installing a 393 stroker kit into the block and I plan on going with AFR heads. I was wondering if the 1974 and later blocks would be better b/c of the taller deck height. Then again maybe earlier blocks would be better b/c of their higher nickel content. Either way I would like to go with a standard bore which would give me plenty to work with. What's your opinion on the subject?

Aside frome the local swap meets and classifieds were is a good place to shop around. Let me know if anybody here has a 351 they want to sell.
 

dolfan87

Founding Member
Dec 28, 2000
1,242
0
0
Lake Havasu, AZ
Aug 6, 2003
#2
  • Aug 6, 2003
  • #2
[QUOTE="REPLIMOD" #17]My body work and paint is nearly complete. Now I need to find a good 351W block and a tremec 3550. I am going to be installing a 393 stroker kit into the block and I plan on going with AFR heads. I was wondering if the 1974 and later blocks would be better b/c of the taller deck height. Then again maybe earlier blocks would be better b/c of their higher nickel content. Either way I would like to go with a standard bore which would give me plenty to work with. What's your opinion on the subject?

Aside frome the local swap meets and classifieds were is a good place to shop around. Let me know if anybody here has a 351 they want to sell.[/QUOTE]


You don't have to worry about "nickle content" until the 80's blocks. I also wouldn't worry about deck hieght as long as the block you get isn't warped badly, you're going to want to have your pistons hit TDC at or around .005 of the deck anyway, as that is where you'll get the best burn.

Find a decent block, and if you can find a nice roller piece from a 97-newer engine...even better.
 
U

unik67

New Member
Apr 7, 2004
3
0
0
santa monica california
Apr 7, 2004
#3
  • Apr 7, 2004
  • #3
351 w in stock

hello I have a 351w from a 78 tbird it has 45,000 m. it was going to be install in my 67 stang but now I'll be using a 302 from a 91 with only 13.000 m on it
so let me know if u r int.
 

hungrymonkey

White by Birth, Trash By Choice
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,077
12
108
Oregon.
Apr 8, 2004
#4
  • Apr 8, 2004
  • #4
97 and newer 351w's?

thought they stopped production right around 95/96
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Apr 8, 2004
#5
  • Apr 8, 2004
  • #5
I've got a 72 block available, but it needs a .030 or 040 overbore to clean up the .025 wear in the #4 cylinder.
 

"REPLIMOD" #17

New Member
Feb 21, 2003
101
0
0
Foothills of SC
Apr 8, 2004
#6
  • Apr 8, 2004
  • #6
appreciate you giving me the heads up, but I already found a block and my motor is finished. I decided to go with a 418 stroker with 185 AFR's.
 
S

snowb07

New Member
Jul 22, 2003
235
0
0
soon to be CT
Apr 9, 2004
#7
  • Apr 9, 2004
  • #7
not to steal your thread but what stroker kit did you go with. and are you doing it yourself or having a machine shop do it.
-fred
 

"REPLIMOD" #17

New Member
Feb 21, 2003
101
0
0
Foothills of SC
Apr 9, 2004
#8
  • Apr 9, 2004
  • #8
The engine was built by Creb Automotive Engineering.
ce-racing.com
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Apr 9, 2004
#9
  • Apr 9, 2004
  • #9
snowb07 said:
not to steal your thread but what stroker kit did you go with. and are you doing it yourself or having a machine shop do it.
Click to expand...
I don;t think you can hijack a thread thats been resurrected from more than 6 months ago
HM said:
97 and newer 351w's?
Click to expand...
Must mean the 331 not the 351, I guess a OHC is even smoother than a roller though.
 

hungrymonkey

White by Birth, Trash By Choice
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,077
12
108
Oregon.
Apr 9, 2004
#10
  • Apr 9, 2004
  • #10
dang, I didnt even catch the date of the original thread.

so how did the stroker turn out?
 
R

rebel65

Member
Feb 1, 2004
363
0
17
SF Bay Area
Jul 29, 2006
#11
  • Jul 29, 2006
  • #11
that ce-racing.com ... like isn't a very good site..where are they located?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Progress Thread 351w stroker rotating assembly and build
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
803
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2025
Noobz347
R
351w stroked to 408 CARB
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
630
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2025
General karthief
Progress Thread 351w Build, 67 Coupe
  • redstang67
  • Oct 4, 2024
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
324
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Oct 5, 2024
89ripper
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
409
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?