• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine 351w Details

  • Thread starter Thread starter RangerJoe
  • Start date Start date Aug 1, 2013

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Aug 1, 2013
#1
  • Aug 1, 2013
  • #1
My father-n-law has been workin on a 408 clevor, using a 351 roller block. He has found that the mains are jacked up a little, so now he is looking at using a different block.

I know the 69-74 are the strongest, with 69&70 having the deck height issues. He has another 1985 351 block, but I'm not sure that it is any stronger than the roller block. Anyone have any specs on the late 70's and 80's blocks?

Also, he has already bought an exspensive pair of solid roller lifters, which fit the roller block without modification. He thinks that they will work in a non-roller block. I don't think they will. Where is the difference in the blocks that require the retrofit rollers? I believe it is in the lifter height itself. Anyone care to enlighten me?

Joe
 

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Aug 2, 2013
#2
  • Aug 2, 2013
  • #2
if you father in law is Doug from TNR? the linkbar solids will work with any of the blocks. from what im told its the hydraulic roller lifters that the different oil hole locations need specific lifters. all the W blocks will work fine. either way you will have to drill the deck and make an intake work.
 
Last edited: Aug 2, 2013

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Aug 2, 2013
#3
  • Aug 2, 2013
  • #3
No, he is Ronnie. Not sure what his screen name is. He will be glad to know the lifters are good then. Is there any gain in using the 85 block over the roller, or does he need to source a 71-74 block?

Thanks Clements, you have been a big help lately!

Joe
 

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
Aug 2, 2013
#4
  • Aug 2, 2013
  • #4
My buddies motor is a 79 block and its fine. ive got a 94 and a 71 block and there isn't that much difference. its the 302 blocks that there is a more of a difference in, but an early 302 block has nothing on the worst Windsor block. I would use which ever one fits the stack height of the rotating assembly better.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 4, 2013
#5
  • Aug 4, 2013
  • #5
69-70 have a 9.48" deck height, 71+ is 9.503"

Clement is right on its the hyd roller lifters you have to watch.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Aug 4, 2013
#6
  • Aug 4, 2013
  • #6
71+ makes it a lot easier to use modern parts. 71-74 blocks have thicker castings so if you plan on making a lot of power see if you can pick up one of those. IT's not difficult to convert those into a roller setup.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
J
351w Rebuild - Looking for Guidance
  • Jakalope
  • Oct 25, 2019
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
2K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Nov 2, 2019
2Blue2
S
Should I mod the 302 or run the 390?
  • Strangler Brett
  • May 19, 2020
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
35
Views
10K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2020
DBegley
D
J
Looking For A Little Knowledge For My 351w
  • Jeremy R
  • Jul 14, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2017
Jeremy R
J
C
98 V6 -> 289 engine swap
  • Cerdman
  • Dec 4, 2018
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
3K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 10, 2018
Cerdman
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?