• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

351W ignition "blip" or miss at 3500rpm or so

  • Thread starter Thread starter ggradtech
  • Start date Start date Sep 26, 2019
G

ggradtech

Active Member
Jun 17, 2016
179
18
28
58
Sep 26, 2019
#1
  • Sep 26, 2019
  • #1
My 93 has a 351W swap. Car runs very smooth for the most part. I have a studder/miss that happens at a specific RPM. Seems to be around 3500 or so. It smoothes out after that studder/miss zone. The tuner thinks its an ignition issue, but he couldnt nail it down. Any thoughts on what it might be? Maybe distributor or coil retlated?
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
37
Hillsborough county
Sep 26, 2019
#2
  • Sep 26, 2019
  • #2
what does the ignition system consist of? do you have a dyno graph showing the AFR?
 
G

ggradtech

Active Member
Jun 17, 2016
179
18
28
58
Sep 26, 2019
#3
  • Sep 26, 2019
  • #3
I'll post it up once I get the car back. I guess the tuning shop needs a new chip. He's using Moates and the chip he had in stock wasn't working properly. He needs to order one.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,955
10,598
203
polk county florida
Sep 26, 2019
#4
  • Sep 26, 2019
  • #4
Put a meter on your tps, slowly run it up to the rpm you have the 'studder' to see if there is a bad spot, do this key on, engine off. At least you will know if it ok or not, then move on to other things.
 
G

ggradtech

Active Member
Jun 17, 2016
179
18
28
58
Sep 26, 2019
#5
  • Sep 26, 2019
  • #5
Ill try the TPS measurement. What is bugging me though is the tuning shop’s response..... they basically said “yeah, we noticed that miss/blip”. That was all they really said though. I asked if they could nail down the issue and they didnt seem to be very responsive. When I dropped off the car, I mentioned the miss. The car runs great otherwise. I figured maybe the tune would straighten it out.They basically said it was “tuned”, but the chip needs to be written. The miss issue is not resolved though. I think they use Moates Quarterhorse. Not sure what t do now. Im fairly certain that theyve already finished the dyno work and a tune I'm just waiting now for a new “chip” so the tune can be installed into my car, and not on their Moates tuning equipment.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,955
10,598
203
polk county florida
Sep 26, 2019
#6
  • Sep 26, 2019
  • #6
I'd be done with that shop.
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
37
Hillsborough county
Sep 26, 2019
#7
  • Sep 26, 2019
  • #7
A car with a miss is not a completed project...
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
50
Seattle
Sep 27, 2019
#8
  • Sep 27, 2019
  • #8
Can they provide any data from the tuning runs? It may show something that points you in a direction.

Generally, it is best to fix little issues like this before tuning... Doesn't help you now, lol, but maybe the next guy reading this will...
 
Reactions: jrichker and General karthief
G

ggradtech

Active Member
Jun 17, 2016
179
18
28
58
Sep 27, 2019
#9
  • Sep 27, 2019
  • #9
So I just basically just rescued my car and gave up on that shop. It's a loooong story. Im not sure what the shop owners' problem is...... When I dropped off my car, I fully explained the situation. I wanted a dyno tune and for them to see what the "miss" or hesitation was at 3500 RPMs or so. He didn't even care or want to figure out that issue. I explained that I assumed they would corrddct the miss or at least let me know what path to go down. Nope. All he did was talk shift about how old and crappy Foxes are and that I should buy a Holley standalone system. I'm sure that the Holley is awesome. It's also big money. I'm sure that there are plenty of folks still using a Ford ECM. Old, sure. I think they still work though. I don't even have a FI car. Just a mild 351 swap. Rant over I guess.
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
37
Hillsborough county
Sep 27, 2019
#10
  • Sep 27, 2019
  • #10
A Miss under load is typically the TFI. The TFI is what actually fires the coil when they start to go badd or become weak they don't Saturate the coil enough and this causes spark loss or a miss under load
 
Reactions: vristang

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
50
Seattle
Sep 30, 2019
#11
  • Sep 30, 2019
  • #11
TFI is worth trying, especially if there are no codes...
Truthfully, as long as the cam is fairly mild, a 351w shouldn't 'need' a tune on a stock fox ecu. Mine did fairly well anyway...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Misfire below 3K RPM
  • foxbodyclark
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
957
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 31, 2025
General karthief
Engine Random Misfire at idle.
  • Gulftown980x
  • Jul 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
229
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2026
squeak93
B
studder/miss on 289 on hard(er) acceleration
  • Bristang5
  • Sep 18, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
340
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2024
jonbearman
J
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
745
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
401
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?