• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

357w: would you do it again??

  • Thread starter Thread starter ras50gt
  • Start date Start date Dec 20, 2019

Which short block? Street car, no track. Goal 450-500hp, TF 11r heads.

  • 357w

    Votes: 2 13.3%
  • 393w

    Votes: 1 6.7%
  • 408w

    Votes: 7 46.7%
  • 347

    Votes: 5 33.3%

  • Total voters
    15
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last

ras50gt

Member
Oct 25, 2005
200
2
19
Dec 20, 2019
#1
  • Dec 20, 2019
  • #1
I'm leaning toward doing a 351w swap over a 347. Was considering going all out to a 408, but talked to a few people that said for a more street friendly car they probably would have done a 347 or 357w. I want to see if anyone else has experience on this. Did you build a short block and then realize you should have done it differently and or went too far with it?

I want to remain streetable and run on pump gas and at least keep up with newer cars. Figure the 351w will also give me room to grow in the future. My goal would be at least 450-500 hp. I had an 03 Cobra, which was my daily driver, around 480hp. I liked the power level and it could hang with a lot of cars. I do have a supercharger to install or sell depending on the route I go. It's a paxton sl1220. Too small for a 357w?
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
Hillsborough county
Dec 20, 2019
#2
  • Dec 20, 2019
  • #2
Lets talk about supporting parts...
as an example I have built a 393w that should make somewhere around 450-500hp easily and be tame enough the wife could go get groceries in it. The way the car idles and cruise characteristics are determined mostly by cam selection.
-cam is mildish mid 230* duration with 114*LSA and 575lift. very streetable and on the small side for a 393w
-heads are budget minded ProMaxx 190cc I chose these on a recommendation, some of my customers i tune for have made great power with these.
- intake choice will vary by build I am using a holley hi ram on this one.
I am hoping for a nice flat torque curve that exceeds 400fllbs from 2200-6200 rpm this will make the car fun to drive. The cam choice will idle easily at 600rpm if i want it too and will have a slightly aggressive tone at idle. Car should get great fuel mileage as well

bottom line the increased displacement will make power production easy and will make a cam act smaller than it is making idle and cruise characteristics smooth. I would never spend money on a short-block or bottom end parts and not stroke the engine.
 
Reactions: 7991LXnSHO

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,126
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Dec 20, 2019
#3
  • Dec 20, 2019
  • #3
What he said.

Go 408 with a custom cam made to be well mannered. Cam gurus know how to make em anyway you want.

My 347 is a bit grumpy because of my cam. I bought it as a whole prebuilt engine, so for me it just is what it is for now. But it’s not because of the stroke.
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Dec 20, 2019
#4
  • Dec 20, 2019
  • #4
Been very happy with my 393w, my cam is a little aggressive but it's just a weekend cruiser.
I would definitely do it again, imo it was a fairly straight forward swap.
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,445
1,530
194
Maryland
Dec 20, 2019
#5
  • Dec 20, 2019
  • #5
393 with mild cam. Yes to the blower for serious top end power. Done right, you should be able to put well over 500hp to the wheel and still be pump gas grocery getter attitude. Limit the compression so you can reduce complications with boost.
 

ras50gt

Member
Oct 25, 2005
200
2
19
Dec 20, 2019
#6
  • Dec 20, 2019
  • #6
My plan was trick flow 11r heads 190 or 205. Can you suggest a mild cam?

So you think the Paxton 1220sl will perform well? Or should I sell it and eventually go with a different blower or turbo?

My thinking is 357 or 393 with a supercharger over going n/a 408.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,953
10,596
203
polk county florida
Dec 20, 2019
#7
  • Dec 20, 2019
  • #7
393 with a BDS 471
You'll have to cut a hole in the hood though.
 

Ragtop50

Member
May 31, 2017
27
11
13
Dec 21, 2019
#8
  • Dec 21, 2019
  • #8
I am in the same situation now. Considering a 357w for various reasons, but mainly because if I go 408, everything else will need to be changed as well to support it (exhaust system, transmission, way bigger heads). I have a 100% street car that gets driven maybe 750 miles a year at most.
I too plan to run boost (supercharger) so I think a 357w would be best of both worlds.
I am also trying to keep this under a stock hood, and with such intake limitations in doing so I would be choking a 408.
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Dec 21, 2019
#9
  • Dec 21, 2019
  • #9
I had a couple of different supercharged set-ups on my original 302w, all probably in the 400-425 hp
range, they were a lot of fun but came with their own set of difficulties.
When I built my 393w I was looking to make similar power but do it n/a, thus eliminating some of the
issues that go along with supercharging.
From my butt dyno I can tell I've pulled it off and then some.
We all know power is addictive and I always liked the sound of a whining s/c, but for now I'm satisfied
with my set-up.
 

ras50gt

Member
Oct 25, 2005
200
2
19
Dec 21, 2019
#10
  • Dec 21, 2019
  • #10
Ragtop50 said:
I am in the same situation now. Considering a 357w for various reasons, but mainly because if I go 408, everything else will need to be changed as well to support it (exhaust system, transmission, way bigger heads). I have a 100% street car that gets driven maybe 750 miles a year at most.
I too plan to run boost (supercharger) so I think a 357w would be best of both worlds.
I am also trying to keep this under a stock hood, and with such intake limitations in doing so I would be choking a 408.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I'm thinking a 357 or 393 will provide plenty of power and fun yet still be streetable. I worry that a 408 and supporting mods will quickly get to 550+ hp and be more of a track car.
 

ras50gt

Member
Oct 25, 2005
200
2
19
Dec 21, 2019
#11
  • Dec 21, 2019
  • #11
Steel1 said:
I had a couple of different supercharged set-ups on my original 302w, all probably in the 400-425 hp
range, they were a lot of fun but came with their own set of difficulties.
When I built my 393w I was looking to make similar power but do it n/a, thus eliminating some of the
issues that go along with supercharging.
From my butt dyno I can tell I've pulled it off and then some.
We all know power is addictive and I always liked the sound of a whining s/c, but for now I'm satisfied
with my set-up.
Click to expand...

I once had my mind set on a 331 with the paxton 1220. Then I was thinking sell the paxton for a kenne bell. Now I see the advantages of going 351w. Decisions decisions.
 
M

Mike62

Member
Oct 23, 2019
12
4
13
New Jersey
Dec 22, 2019
#12
  • Dec 22, 2019
  • #12
The old saleen s351r was a mild 351w with a vortech, they made around 480hp. That should be reliable for years.
 

ras50gt

Member
Oct 25, 2005
200
2
19
Jan 4, 2020
#13
  • Jan 4, 2020
  • #13
ttt, added a poll
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Jan 4, 2020
#14
  • Jan 4, 2020
  • #14
347 every Saturday and twice on Sunday. I have a friend that committed to a 351 years ago, and I went with a 347. My nitrous 347 absolutely kills his turbo 351. Here's why, the 347 was essentially a drop in. It meant less time, and a lot less money. The 351 swap nickel and dimes you to death on swap parts; special engine mounts, different headers, different distributor, etc, on and on. That means you have less money to spend on parts that actually do more, like a better axle, good clutch, really good tune. In fact, in the real world, you can put an aftermarket block 347 in for less money than a stock block 351w swap. I've priced it out several times. Now I'm not saying there isn't a perfect methodical build sheet to put a 351w in for less money, what I'm saying is that in the real world, you get hit with all kinds of unexpected costs. A 4 bolt main 8.2" (302) block is going to give you way more room to grow than a stock 2 bolt 351w engine.

Kurt
 
Reactions: 2000xp8

ras50gt

Member
Oct 25, 2005
200
2
19
Feb 22, 2020
#15
  • Feb 22, 2020
  • #15
I feel like the more research I do, the more I change my mind. I spoke with someone at a car show recently that had a 351w and he said if he had to do it over again he probably would just do a mild 331/347. Main reason, like Kurt mentioned was just the little nickel and dime items and figuring out what parts fit. Even now after all is done, if something needs to be replaced or upgraded, it's more of a headache to do. Obviosuly he got bigger heads, etc but he said before he knew it he was over 500hp which may not sound like a negative but his goal was similar to mine (450hp, more streetable, not necessarily a daily driver but could be.)


revhead347 said:
347 every Saturday and twice on Sunday. I have a friend that committed to a 351 years ago, and I went with a 347. My nitrous 347 absolutely kills his turbo 351. Here's why, the 347 was essentially a drop in. It meant less time, and a lot less money. The 351 swap nickel and dimes you to death on swap parts; special engine mounts, different headers, different distributor, etc, on and on. That means you have less money to spend on parts that actually do more, like a better axle, good clutch, really good tune. In fact, in the real world, you can put an aftermarket block 347 in for less money than a stock block 351w swap. I've priced it out several times. Now I'm not saying there isn't a perfect methodical build sheet to put a 351w in for less money, what I'm saying is that in the real world, you get hit with all kinds of unexpected costs. A 4 bolt main 8.2" (302) block is going to give you way more room to grow than a stock 2 bolt 351w engine.

Kurt
Click to expand...
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Feb 23, 2020
#16
  • Feb 23, 2020
  • #16
Any engine build is going to nickle and dime you , prepare yourself for that going in.
 
Reactions: revhead347

Ragtop50

Member
May 31, 2017
27
11
13
Feb 23, 2020
#17
  • Feb 23, 2020
  • #17
If you are targeting around 450 HP, I absolutely would stay 8.2 deck and go with a 331/347. And actually, due to a heavier rotating mass, a 347 may perform better than a 351/357 depending on the setup. Close to stock, I would say definitely that would be the case.
Thing is, you have to be honest with yourself about that really being your goal and limit. Most people end up wanting more.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,035
1,625
194
NJ
Feb 23, 2020
#18
  • Feb 23, 2020
  • #18
Use a dart 302 block, if needed, I think you could goto a 363.
Especially if you are going to do a supercharger.
I see no point in making the swap more expensive, difficult and heavier with a 351.
A dart block is superior to any 2 bolt 351.

But if you want the car to run and feel like a terminator, there is only one way to really do that...
 
Reactions: nickyb and General karthief

Ragtop50

Member
May 31, 2017
27
11
13
Feb 23, 2020
#19
  • Feb 23, 2020
  • #19
2000xp8 said:
Use a dart 302 block, if needed, I think you could goto a 363.
Especially if you are going to do a supercharger.
I see no point in making the swap more expensive, difficult and heavier with a 351.
A dart block is superior to any 2 bolt 351.

But if you want the car to run and feel like a terminator, there is only one way to really do that...
Click to expand...

Problem there is a dart block is going to make it a good bit more expensive than a 351. That's one main reason people go the 9.5 deck route, can be a good bit cheaper than a dart block and of course the ability to really go up in cubic inches. There are plenty of 351/357s running around putting down 650/700+ hp on a stock block, it can take it.
Also, a dart block will be heavier than a stock block 8.2 deck.
Dart block is great, but it will be more expensive.

But keep in mind, you may have issues installing your supercharger on a 351 without a proper or modified bracket.
 
Last edited: Feb 23, 2020

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,035
1,625
194
NJ
Feb 23, 2020
#20
  • Feb 23, 2020
  • #20
While in some situations, depending on how you acquire the 351, it may come out cheaper than a dart, there is still all the swap parts you have to pay for.
There are no swap parts for a 347. You could literally bolt everything you own back on it.

I'd be curious on what everyone around here makes with their 351 builds, either quarter mile or rearwheel dyno.
Over the years other than on race cars, i've seen little proof it's worth the effort.
 
Reactions: revhead347
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
666
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
509
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Thursday at 5:49 PM
85GT4V
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
592
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?