• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

393w hp estimates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BlackVert
  • Start date Start date Aug 30, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 30, 2006
#1
  • Aug 30, 2006
  • #1
about how much hp would a combo like this make?

393 Windsor with an adequately flowing intake:
- heads: World products windsor junior stage 1 (58cc chamber)
- cam: hydraulic flat tappet:
- lift .520/.544 duration 234/244 at 50 w/112 overlap
- rockers: 1.6"
 
M

My95FORD

New Member
Jul 6, 2004
13
0
0
Aug 30, 2006
#2
  • Aug 30, 2006
  • #2
Hey how well did the 351 im assuming to get the stroker fit in your 95?...was thinking of going that route...also how did you like your KB blower?...thjinking of getting a blowzilla...THANKS CHRIS
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 30, 2006
#3
  • Aug 30, 2006
  • #3
The KB was great, but too much for my fragile little motor. I am having major oil burning issues, so I took the KB off. Now I am looking into a 393 as a replacement for my motor.

I don't have a 393 in my car.

I hear the 351 fits fine, but you may need a new hood because the 351 block is about 1.5 inches taller than a 302.
 
M

My95FORD

New Member
Jul 6, 2004
13
0
0
Aug 30, 2006
#4
  • Aug 30, 2006
  • #4
OK sounds great.....What HP numbers did you have with the KB on your 302?...Did you have a main girlde(i think thats what they call it) to help the block?....Im looking into also the 351 i have already a 4" rise cowl that i got from a company in ohio...it looks great on my 95....really good quality.....what KB did you have too? did you have to do any internal stuff to get the KB working ok and safely?..THANKS
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 30, 2006
#5
  • Aug 30, 2006
  • #5
Um, I hope this doesn't come across too harsh, but this thread is not about my KB experiences, it's about estimating power from a particular 393 windsor combo.

Feel free to post your questions about my KB here, and I'll be happy to answer them all:

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=576718
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Aug 30, 2006
#6
  • Aug 30, 2006
  • #6
Your putting mild components on the 393? If that's the case your better off with a 347. What's the rest of the combo? Intake? TB? MAF? Exhaust?
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Aug 30, 2006
#7
  • Aug 30, 2006
  • #7
Yea that combo is weak. Id spend the few extra dollars to put some better parts on there. Important part being a custom cam so you can get the drivability + power production right where u want it.

With decent to good parts im sure making over 1 rwhp to 1 cube wont be an issue.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Aug 30, 2006
#8
  • Aug 30, 2006
  • #8
BlackVert said:
Um, I hope this doesn't come across too harsh, but this thread is not about my KB experiences, it's about estimating power from a particular 393 windsor combo.

Feel free to post your questions about my KB here, and I'll be happy to answer them all:

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=576718
Click to expand...

Yep. A little off topic is ok but..

Check the search or start another thread on those questions. Hey 351's are great too! Good luck!
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 30, 2006
#9
  • Aug 30, 2006
  • #9
those are the components on the standard CHP 393w long block that goes for $4099. i talked to them today.

i was thinking along the lines of a typhoon intake and a 75mm t/b with a lightning maf with it.

any hp estimates?

and yes, i think i'd rather have a mild 393 over a radical 347 if the hp/torque numbers are similar.

of course one could go more radical later if one wanted and kick the **** out of the 347 guys.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Aug 31, 2006
#10
  • Aug 31, 2006
  • #10
What we are trying to say is if your gonna build a 393, build a 393. With all the work half assing it right now will be a big disappointment later. You don't have to get radical but putting 302 parts on a 393 is such a waste. Get a real intake, heads and cam in it.
 

Redsnk95

Founding Member
Feb 3, 2002
2,243
1
0
Houston, TX
Aug 31, 2006
#11
  • Aug 31, 2006
  • #11
Your putting components that I would use a 302 or 306, on a 393....why? Other than it being a torque monster. If your going to do a 393 just go ahead and get a good intake and heads...like AFR 205s or 225s and a TFS R intake. If cost is an issue then you really need to sit down and figure up how much money you want to spend and figure up how much power you want to make and then make the phone call to whomever you plan to use.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 31, 2006
#12
  • Aug 31, 2006
  • #12
ok, let me try this again. people keep saying i am putting this combo together like this, and telling me that it is stupid. i did not come up with this list, it came from coast high performance.

i called chp and asked them what components they include in their 393 street fighter gt long block.

the list in the first post is what they told me that they put in their standard 393 longblock. i did not make it up.

is that clear enough? ok

so my question, also in the first post, is:

about how much hp (and tq) would this combo be expected to make, given a 75mm tb, a tyhpoon intake, and a 90mm maf?

so please stop bashing the combo and answer the ****ing question, geez
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Aug 31, 2006
#13
  • Aug 31, 2006
  • #13
http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive/raceheadford.html
Are those the heads you have listed? The numbers don't look too bad, but I have no clue how they actually perform.
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Aug 31, 2006
#14
  • Aug 31, 2006
  • #14
BlackVert said:
ok, let me try this again. people keep saying i am putting this combo together like this, and telling me that it is stupid. i did not come up with this list, it came from coast high performance.

i called chp and asked them what components they include in their 393 street fighter gt long block.

the list in the first post is what they told me that they put in their standard 393 longblock. i did not make it up.

is that clear enough? ok

so my question, also in the first post, is:

about how much hp (and tq) would this combo be expected to make, given a 75mm tb, a tyhpoon intake, and a 90mm maf?

so please stop bashing the combo and answer the ****ing question, geez
Click to expand...

LoL chill out dude. Everyone is just trying to help out. Cause we all have done this at one time (used less then ideal parts) then regreted it down the road.

Anyways, since CHP told you the parts they use.. Why not ask them what they rate the motor at and with what intake?
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 31, 2006
#15
  • Aug 31, 2006
  • #15
the guy didn't have the part number ...

World Products Windsor Junior stage 1 heads
58cc chambers, 180cc runners. 1.94/1.60 valves

looks like part #053030-3 probably
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 31, 2006
#16
  • Aug 31, 2006
  • #16
i just found this:

http://www.fordmuscle.com/forums/dyno-techboard/351-windsor-chassis-dyno-results_14330.html

http://www.portpros.com/PartsCatalog/windsorjr.pdf#search="053030-3"

http://store.summitracing.com/partd...400240+4294867081+4294867028+115&autoview=sku
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Aug 31, 2006
#17
  • Aug 31, 2006
  • #17
well those HP/TQ numbers arent impressive at all. If thats all you want then just pick up a stock shortblock for ~ 300 bucks a set of afr165's and a cam of your choice.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Aug 31, 2006
#18
  • Aug 31, 2006
  • #18
Oops, I was looking at the Pro-Street package from CHP that comes with the Victor Jr. heads. If you go with the Windsor Jr heads on a 393, I wouldn't expect much more hp than that dyno you posted up.
These World Products Windsor Jr. heads feature 180cc intake runners that combine high velocity and superior flow to produce excellent torque and throttle response in stock to mildly modified 5.0L engines.
Click to expand...

I guess you could always upgrade in the future, but IMO you're not gonna be happy at all with that combo.


Did you notice this in your first link?
FOR REFERENCE ON YOUR HEAD AND CAM CHOICE. MY COMBO IS 392 STROKER, XE282HR CAM, AFR 185 HEADS, VICTOR JR INTAKE, TREMEC TKO TRANS, CARBURETED IN AN EARLY CHASSIS. THIS COMBO POSTED 443 RWHP ON THE DYNO-JET. I FEEL THE AFRS WILL OUTPERFORM THE WORLD HEADS BY A GOOD MARGIN.
Click to expand...
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Aug 31, 2006
#19
  • Aug 31, 2006
  • #19
Wow, relax....

If you need to know numbers that bad just ask CHP. We're just trying to help since the majority of the people in this thread have already done this. If you want a 300HP 393 by all means spend the money to do so. I don't think you need to spend $5-7K to do it though. If that's your bag then more power to ya.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Aug 31, 2006
#20
  • Aug 31, 2006
  • #20
dp
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
E
For Sale 1989 LX Notch 410ci 85mm turbo 8 pt cage 9" rear end
  • EightyNineFive
  • Aug 22, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
5K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 18, 2022
Freakinstang
F
Engine 351W - Std cam or Roller?
  • ClevelandTim
  • Dec 1, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 2, 2019
vristang
7
73 mustang blower build info needed
  • 73stang347
  • Sep 20, 2018
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2018
rbohm
Stangnet Newbie: Horsepower/torque Estimate For My 1983 Gt
  • EBW83
  • Jan 19, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 22, 2018
stanglx2002
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?