skullmaster427 said:01 gt 5 spd![]()
Dingleweed said:For those of you that are trying to decide what gears to get, and what difference it makes in the actual torque applied to your back tires... try this out for size.
So, I have been doing a little homework trying to figure out if I want to get 4.10s or 4.30s. One thing that I did to help me decide was to graph the actual torque to the wheels (dyno WTQ x gear ratio x diff. gear ratio) for a variety of different gears versus my car's speed.
For the dyno WTQ numbers I used this graph that I found for a stock 1999 Cobra (since I haven't dynoed my car...yet):
![]()
(I forget where I found this, but it seems kind of typical, and my car is sort of near stock... for now...)
I then mapped out the torque curve and input the data into a data processing program that I use. Once the data was acquired, I calculated the torque to the wheels (after gears, and differential ratios). For speed I used the info for the stock 245/45R17 tires.
Here's the chart for 3.90 differential gears:
![]()
and for 4.10 gears...
![]()
and for 4.30 gears...
![]()
and for 4.56 gears...
![]()
Since actual torque to the wheels is directly proportional to your acceleration, just think of the vertical axis as the kick in the pants that you feel for that gear at that particular speed.![]()
As you can see, from a roll in second gear (say on the 4.10 graph) from anywhere between 20 and 50 mph, you have an extra 500 or so ft-lbs of torque to the back wheels! So, for 4.10 gears, second gear pretty much feels like second gear with 3.27s with a 100 or so shot of nitrous!
These graphs and data are rather useful for other things; for instance, thrust (forward force) is your torque to the wheels divided my the radius of your back tire. Since the stock 245/45R17 tires are close to a foot in radius (12.84") you can approximately think of the vertical axes as the forward thrust of your car. Then divide that number by your car's weight and you have your forward thrust in g's. (Of course this is all assuming that you don't break traction...) Also, where you see the curves for a given set of gears cross is your optimal shift point for maximum acceleration and 1/4 mile times.
My conclusions:
After playing around with the numbers, I am definitely going with 4.30 gears! With sticky tires, first gear will launch you out of the hole like a freaked out cat on carpet. Then for regular city driving on street tires, second and thrid gear would make it feel like I've got another 100 to 130 ft-lbs of torque to pin me back in the seat for sh1ts and giggles!
I had the "fun" of analyzing this data for my own info and gear decision, but I thought the info and graphs might be useful for the rest of the community.
Enjoy...![]()
5spd GT said:Getting gears shouldn't be based on just performance.
In response to the comment about 3,000 rpm at 90mph with 4:10's...you might want to check the tach. It is higher than that (rpm wise).
Give Me TP said:No, it's 3000 rpm at 90 mph on both the stock tach and on Predator datalogging. Odometer readings match milepost markers very closely, so the speedometer adjustment done by the Predator is also correct.
already.. i just gonna keep on search i guess.. and as i see that 4.10s r a little too wild for my car... and 3.73 seens to be too close to stock.. i guess i will be going for 3.90s! rpm sounds okie for me well tops i would go for... and the only mods i have in my list are not much as hp... but more to makeing the car a little better as pulleys... alu. drive shaft next thing will be fly wheel... my clutch its getting there.... (dunno yet witch one to get... as all the cars i had b4 all gm used most the time centerforce any good price vs. quality? better than stock ...now i should have no problem as far as rebalancing the engine on changing for a lighter fly wheel ...

skullmaster427 said:grrrr this gear thing man i am telling ya... its getting mealready.. i just gonna keep on search i guess.. and as i see that 4.10s r a little too wild for my car... and 3.73 seens to be too close to stock.. i guess i will be going for 3.90s! rpm sounds okie for me well tops i would go for... and the only mods i have in my list are not much as hp... but more to makeing the car a little better as pulleys... alu. drive shaft next thing will be fly wheel... my clutch its getting there.... (dunno yet witch one to get... as all the cars i had b4 all gm used most the time centerforce any good price vs. quality? better than stock ...now i should have no problem as far as rebalancing the engine on changing for a lighter fly wheel ...
![]()
01 gt 5spd![]()
jstreet0204 said:Sorry man, but 90mph in 5th is around 3200 rpm. It shows that on my datalogs. If you are at 3000 with close to stock size tires you have 3.90 gears.
jstreet0204 said:The people saying 4.10's are too wild, are usually the ones that don't have them. There was a guy on here a while back that got 4.10's and his wife didn't like them because she had to shift to often, so he switch back to 3.73's and regretted it. You might find 1 person in a 100 that doesn't like the 4.10's after they get them. You have to remember that alot of the impression that 4.10's are too much comes from back in the days when you could get them as a factory option on cars with no overdrive transmission.![]()
Give Me TP said:Sorry, but they were a new in-the-box FRPP ring & pinion set (FRPP 8.8" gear sets do not come in 3.90), the drive shaft revolutions per complete turn of the rear wheel are correct, and I was present during the installation. I will, however, look closely at the tach again today if I can get up to 90 mph and report back here my error if it is indeed 3200 rpm. An extra 200 rpm would actually be a good thing to me, because I've occasionally thought "should I have gone with 4.30s?".

I personally don't like doing that to my internals/piston rings for long periods of time...the steeper the gear the more internally abused.