• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

4.30's too much gear???

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adam95GT
  • Start date Start date Feb 13, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Feb 13, 2009
#1
  • Feb 13, 2009
  • #1
Chris has a set in a box he got when he was working at JDM in Jersey.... hes willing to just give them to me i think....
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Feb 13, 2009
#2
  • Feb 13, 2009
  • #2
Use an RPM calculator to know for sure... I would have to guess yes if you do a lot of highway driving.... but that is only a little worse than my 3.73s...
 

TrueBlue95GT

Member
Sep 29, 2003
966
0
16
Connecticut
Feb 13, 2009
#3
  • Feb 13, 2009
  • #3
If you do any highway driving at all, you're going to regret it. I get annoyed on the highway with my 4.10's.
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Feb 13, 2009
#4
  • Feb 13, 2009
  • #4
I am a fan of 4.10s with a stick, DRs, and a mild setup and can vouch for what they feel like. However, I would be leary about 4.30s. I can't say from experience, but I just don't know how much beyond 4.10s is reasonable.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Feb 13, 2009
#5
  • Feb 13, 2009
  • #5
for daily driving with a stick shift, i think even 4.30s are way too much gear. even with 3.73s, first gear lasts about 2 seconds before you have to shift into 2nd

without a stick, it is not as painful (at least you aren't shifting all the time), but the rpms are going to be noticeable higher at highway cruising speeds

and forget about the speedo or odometer even being close to accurate at all

for a race car that can wind up the rpms, probably not too much gear

even then, in a 1/4 mile race, with the 4.30s you might have to shift one more time, which might actually slow you down all together
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Feb 13, 2009
#6
  • Feb 13, 2009
  • #6
YES but only with a 6 speed.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Feb 13, 2009
#7
  • Feb 13, 2009
  • #7
Too much for what? Depends if your combo needs that gear or not. My 4.30's have always been just fine on the highway. But than again, I don't drive like dale earnhart.
 

NotQuik

Founding Member
Oct 21, 2000
5,158
29
88
Central Florida
Feb 13, 2009
#8
  • Feb 13, 2009
  • #8
if they are that good of a deal you have nothing to lose....you can always put in a lower gear in the future if need be.
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Feb 13, 2009
#9
  • Feb 13, 2009
  • #9
They are what I am going to run. Get them for free and sell them to me cheap!
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Feb 13, 2009
#10
  • Feb 13, 2009
  • #10
Grn92LX said:
Too much for what? Depends if your combo needs that gear or not. My 4.30's have always been just fine on the highway. But than again, I don't drive like dale earnhart.
Click to expand...

One..maybe 2 out of 100 peeps will agree.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Feb 14, 2009
#11
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #11
Pokageek said:
One..maybe 2 out of 100 peeps will agree.
Click to expand...

..and that would be part of the reason those 98 or 99 people are slow Either that or inexperienced with said part

Gear the car for the powerband. If you have a low rpm combo with a typical 26" tire, you do not need a steeper gear. Very simple.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Feb 14, 2009
#12
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #12
I guess I'm that 2nd person that will agree with 4.30s. Hell, I'm going 4.56s. Don't fear the gear. I ran 4.10s in my SN and loved them, and wouldn't of hesitated going with 4.30s. It does depend on your combo and plans so take that into consideration.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Feb 14, 2009
#13
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #13
Funny you showed up..lol. Yes I would have guessed yourself as the second. But thats ok. I totally agree with BV once again. I dont want the guy hating his car like most would.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Feb 14, 2009
#14
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #14
i want 3.90's or 4.10's but the 4.30's would be free....
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Feb 14, 2009
#15
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #15
Get what ever gear your combo and powerband NEED. Don't worry about an extra 150 rpm's on the highway in overdrive. What are you building? Are the gears for the stock car in your sig?
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Feb 14, 2009
#16
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #16
i guess the obvious question is ... how do you intend to drive the car? daily driving, street/strip, or strip only?

i believe that for daily driving with a stick shift, you will end up not liking 4.30s

that is my opinion
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Feb 14, 2009
#17
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #17
Pokageek said:
Funny you showed up..lol. Yes I would have guessed yourself as the second.
Click to expand...

Why is that?



As far as the gears being free, take them, a couple hundred of rpms on the highway is not a big deal. If you're staying n/a for a while, get them.
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Feb 14, 2009
#18
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #18
Well regardless, don't put something on your car just cause its free. Free things can be tempting to use, but its worthless if its not what you want exactly.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Feb 14, 2009
#19
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #19
List of the Build:
306 block
keith black flat top pistons(hyper)
wolverine 1190 cam shaft.
10 cut crank.
Stock rods.
Arp rod bolts
TFS KPI street heads Highports.... 1.94 or 2.02 intakes
3/8 intake spacer
65mm BBK TB
TFS TB elbow
24lb injectors
24lb pro m maf.
FRPP pulley set
comp magnium 1.6 rail type roller rockers
TFS Track heat manifold.
low milage stock t5
low milage ford racing clutch kit.
walbro 190 fuel pump.
all new gaskets
new starter
new rad
new rack

Exhaust:
BBK catted H
BBK shortie headers
Flowmaster 40's

Suspension:
HP blues
Sportlines

other:
New vert top.
New heater core
MM 6 point cage.(yet to be ordered)

Clean up bay:
hide wires
Sand blast
Paint.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Feb 14, 2009
#20
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #20
I know what you mean Keith, but if he's staying n/a then why not? I drove my friends car which had 4.30s and really liked it. Didn't notice a whole lot of difference in normal driving over my 4.10s.

Really NOT trying to be an azzhole here, but have you driven a car geared with 4.30s?



Edit* just saw your plans, I still say DO IT!
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Megasquirt base tune for 94 5.0
  • wrx757
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
180
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2026
wrx757
W
T
Progress Thread 2002 Mustang 3.8L CV
  • TheIncompetentMechanic
  • May 26, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
52
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
TheIncompetentMechanic
T
P
rear Impact absorbers.
  • Praetorious
  • May 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
132
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2026
Praetorious
P
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
107
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2026
AeroCoupe
6
2010 V6 Sees differently than GT?
  • 6t9Mach1
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
160
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Apr 1, 2026
6t9Mach1
6
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?