• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox 4 Cylinder to V8 Tach

  • Thread starter Thread starter 93CalypsoConvert
  • Start date Start date Feb 22, 2023
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Feb 25, 2023
#21
  • Feb 25, 2023
  • #21
The pots are for calibration. One calibrates the high range, the other calibrates the low range. The 89-later tachs have two pots, and the 87-88 tachs only have a single adjustment pot.

Calibration method using the pots is in the video up above.


What caught my eye is the traces that are bridges marked “cyl”. My tach doesn’t have that. I wonder if desoldering it changes it to a v8 version. Would need to see a 90-93 v8 tach and see if that is soldered together.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,110
21,285
234
Box behind Walmart
Feb 25, 2023
#22
  • Feb 25, 2023
  • #22
It actually looks pretty good. Turn it upside down and look closely to see if [any] of the solder joints have cracks --or-- Just go over each joint with a soldering iron and flux and reflow them. I don't see any burned components in the images. Just the heat discoloration on the board.

You may want to check the diodes in that heated area to make sure they're still only going one-way but you'd need to remove them.

If that's a voltage regulator (the square peg with the round hole in it) it's probably shot. the center lead is ground, the one on the left should be input and the one leading to the discolored portion of the board should be output. Pretty sure that thing is running wide open and not regulating anything ATM.

That's all I got with pikcherz. Overall, the thing looks pretty good
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Feb 25, 2023
#23
  • Feb 25, 2023
  • #23
Hers the ‘88 v8 tach I have which the board layout is a bit different. There is a resistor marked with an “8” that is offset by itself


I should have an ‘88 4cyl tach Monday so I will compare. Will need to see how that translates to a 90-93 tach however since they appear to be a little different


 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Feb 25, 2023
#24
  • Feb 25, 2023
  • #24
This is an interesting thread showing add an adjustable pot to adjust the tach reading. Different generation but this method might also work depending on what we find.

Electrical - tachometer conversion from 6 to 8 cylinder (will also work for 4 to 6 or 4 to 8 but with different resistor size)

I bought an complete instrument cluster, because it had a KPH speedometer. So there was a spare tachometer to work with, without having fear to destroy it. I removed it from the instrument cluster. The complete tachometer consists of three main parts: - circuit board (which the 4 wire plug from...
stangnet.com
 
Reactions: Noobz347

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,110
21,285
234
Box behind Walmart
Feb 25, 2023
#25
  • Feb 25, 2023
  • #25
Mustang5L5 said:
This is an interesting thread showing add an adjustable pot to adjust the tach reading. Different generation but this method might also work depending on what we find.

Electrical - tachometer conversion from 6 to 8 cylinder (will also work for 4 to 6 or 4 to 8 but with different resistor size)

I bought an complete instrument cluster, because it had a KPH speedometer. So there was a spare tachometer to work with, without having fear to destroy it. I removed it from the instrument cluster. The complete tachometer consists of three main parts: - circuit board (which the 4 wire plug from...
stangnet.com
Click to expand...
Did you find that in the feed beneath this thread? Would be cool if you did. Means its working-ish
 

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Feb 25, 2023
#26
  • Feb 25, 2023
  • #26
Desoldering the “Cyl” resistor makes it not work. The original resistor is 10 K ohms. I swapped out with a 51k, but it had no effect. It’s still reads double. Interestingly, increasing the resistance on the pot actually makes it read higher. Decreasing resistance reads lower.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Feb 25, 2023
#27
  • Feb 25, 2023
  • #27
Noobz347 said:
Did you find that in the feed beneath this thread? Would be cool if you did. Means its working-ish
Click to expand...


I did. Was at Thea top of recommended threads
 

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Feb 25, 2023
#28
  • Feb 25, 2023
  • #28
I found that varying the input +12v resistance has no effect, nor does varying the resistance on the signal wire. I am going through and swapping the resistors out. Some of them are only a few ohms so I'm going to save those for last. Any other ideas on how I should approach this?
 

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,467
2,901
173
Florida
Feb 25, 2023
#29
  • Feb 25, 2023
  • #29
General karthief said:
And I are not one of them.
But I flew a toy helicopter once. Didn't end well
Click to expand...
Were you the guy in " flight of the Phoenix"?
 
Reactions: General karthief

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Feb 25, 2023
#30
  • Feb 25, 2023
  • #30
Success! I figured it out.

Here is how you do it for 1993 tach:



The blue resistor in the middle needs to be replaced to a 20.0K ohm resistor. My original one reads 43.2K Ohm.
I soldered a 50k ohm potentiometer into it and varied until tach reading was correct.


I found that the proper resistance was 20k ohms exactly.
I tested this with the tach out of the car running off of battery power:



I adjusted the two pots already on the board to 84.8 ohms and 9.64K ohms. This gave me results very close to a digital reading.
Here is a video of it working:


I'm going to purchase a normal 20k ohm resistor and solder it in place of the original and reinstall.
After some more testing, it is ±100 rpm between 0-4000 rpm. I haven't tested past that.
 
Last edited: Feb 25, 2023
Reactions: chilsam, 90sickfox, Mustang5L5 and 1 other person

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Feb 25, 2023
#31
  • Feb 25, 2023
  • #31
nice work.


So what’s the existing value of the resistor for the 4cyl engine and what value resistor did you swap to?

The 87-89 tachs are different, so I’ll see if what you discovered holds true to those tachs as well when I get my hands on one next week. Good info to pass along.
 

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Feb 25, 2023
#32
  • Feb 25, 2023
  • #32
43.2K original 20.0K swapped
 
Reactions: Mustang5L5

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Feb 25, 2023
#33
  • Feb 25, 2023
  • #33
93CalypsoConvert said:
43.2K original 20.0K swapped
Click to expand...

Let me see if the same hood true with the older tachs.
 
Reactions: 93CalypsoConvert

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Mar 8, 2023
#34
  • Mar 8, 2023
  • #34
Finally got a chance to mess with the 87-89 tach. First I hooked up the frequency generator to make sure they both output what I expected them to.

As you can see, 4 cyl tach is 2x.



Broke them down and started measuring/recording resistances. Not much is different. All the readings were pretty similar except for one resistor.

V8 tach was 210k ohms
4cyl was 188k ohms.

So roughly a 22k ohm difference…same as the newer tach it seem.

Need to grab a potentiometer to try adjusting the value.

It’s the small resistor on top right side that is standing vertically next to a larger resistor. Not confirmed yet, just suspected.

 
Last edited: Mar 8, 2023
Reactions: 93CalypsoConvert

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Mar 8, 2023
#35
  • Mar 8, 2023
  • #35
The resistor that I changed was the next component on the circuit after the potentiometer.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Mar 8, 2023
#36
  • Mar 8, 2023
  • #36
93CalypsoConvert said:
The resistor that I changed was the next component on the circuit after the potentiometer.
Click to expand...

Thanks. I just checked the next resistor in-line and not much of a difference between the two. 56k ohms vs 58k ohms. Not sure if that’s enough to do the trick but I’ll test it.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Mar 9, 2023
#37
  • Mar 9, 2023
  • #37
Ok. First resistor after the potentiometer it is. What’s strange is the values are not that much different. 64.9k ohms on the 4 cyl and 60.4k ohms on the v8 tach. That’s according to the bands on the resistor and not measured values

I did try a 61k ohm resistor in the 4 cyl tach and it didn’t work, so there is some other differences in how these tachs are setup other than a sole resistor.

What’s even more interesting is the values drifted a lot from their markings. More than 10% in both cases. Able to compensate with the onboard potentiometer but that probably explains why these tachs are so inaccurate of those resistors are that far out of tolerance.

I tested a few resistors I had and it looks like 15-25k ohms is the range. Rather than guess I ordered a potentiometer in the correct range to dial it in.

Here’s the location for everyone who might find this thread in a search for the 87-89 tach. It’s the spot currently missing a resistor marked with the two red arrows. I’ll chime in with the correct value once I determine it.

 
Last edited: Mar 9, 2023
Reactions: Noobz347

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,110
21,285
234
Box behind Walmart
Mar 9, 2023
#38
  • Mar 9, 2023
  • #38
Add thread tags when you're all done. Gimme a holler if you need help.
 
Reactions: General karthief

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Mar 9, 2023
#39
  • Mar 9, 2023
  • #39
24k ohms is the value. Actually 24.5k would be better but I didn’t have that actual resistor on hand.


What I did was set the 20k adjustment pot to 10k ohms and found the 24k resistor put me almost on the money. Had to tune to 10.5k ohms with the adjustment pot and it was spot on.

So, 87-89 tach. 24k or 24.5k ohms is the resistor you need to put in the above spot.

Actually, 89 tachs have two adjustment pots. So this one could be different. I have an 89 tach in my car, but not pulling it out to verify right now.

Frequency set to 200 hz, which is 3k rpm.

 
Reactions: 93CalypsoConvert and General karthief

93CalypsoConvert

Active Member
Nov 26, 2020
275
91
38
Virginia
Mar 10, 2023
#40
  • Mar 10, 2023
  • #40
Good stuff. I wonder what a 4-6-8 switch actually does do the circuit on tachometers equipped with it.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
731
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
How to get a tach signal for N2O RPM window switch.
  • drofdeath
  • Oct 6, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
854
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2023
drofdeath
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
Progress Thread Nicholase "lights out" build-
  • nicholase
  • Aug 10, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 26 27 28
Replies
552
Views
40K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Monday at 12:34 PM
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
900
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?