• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

4 Hole Carb Spacer on Vic Jr. on 408W Stroker

  • Thread starter Thread starter armand67Fstback
  • Start date Start date Oct 23, 2011

armand67Fstback

Member
Oct 30, 2007
146
1
19
Oct 23, 2011
#1
  • Oct 23, 2011
  • #1
My hunch is that my single plane 351W Vic Jr. Intake is too high RPM for a 60% street driven vehicle with 3.89 gears. The other 40% I would say would be spirited mountain road driving.

What would a Wilson Manifolds 1 inch 4 hole tapered carb spacer do to this combination?


 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Oct 23, 2011
#2
  • Oct 23, 2011
  • #2
What driving condition are you trying to fix at this point? Why do you think you need a new intake? I have an air gap on my 69 w/351W (670 Holley) and 3.89 gears, all I need now is an over drive...
 

robbz28

10 Year Member
Sep 23, 2009
775
5
39
Epps, LA
Oct 24, 2011
#3
  • Oct 24, 2011
  • #3
If anything probably make things worse...you need to ditch that victor jr. (great drag racing intake) and go for a torker II or a high rise dual plane intake. I had a torker II on my small block camaro that I drove around on the street a lot....it did well. Also whatever camshaft you have will determine street manners way moreso than the intake will.
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Oct 24, 2011
#4
  • Oct 24, 2011
  • #4
The spacer won't do anything for the car really. On a 408W I can't imagine the Vic Jr. being too crazy. I run one on my 351W and love it. Yes it needs some revs but screams up top. With yours being on a stroker it shouldn't have too much trouble moving that air through the runners at lower rpms. A lot of debate on the single plane vs. dual plane but the single planes always net more power, and rarely a decrease in torque. If you were running a 351 I would recommend something different for your needs, but with a 408 should run strong. What heads and cam you running with it? That intake won't do much good unless the rest of the engine is ready to breathe.
 

armand67Fstback

Member
Oct 30, 2007
146
1
19
Oct 24, 2011
#5
  • Oct 24, 2011
  • #5
I am still in the process of gathering parts, but I already have the block, crank, pistons, and a Vic Jr intake.

I plan on getting some Twisted Wedge 205 heads for this motor in a few months.

I was debating between the Vic Jr and a Air Gap but found a decent deal on the Vic Jr.

Yeah the 4-hole spacers can get expensive.

Based on the feedback, I will go ahead and try out the Vic Jr. If it does not run the way I need it to, I will just switch over to an Air Gap down the road.

Thanks for everyone's help.
 
M

MitchGT

Member
Apr 1, 2005
204
0
17
Oct 26, 2011
#6
  • Oct 26, 2011
  • #6
I think the manifold is a good choice for a stroker. you have an extra 57 cubes you need to feed, and with 3.89's in the back, low end torque shouldn't be a consideration. I think traction will be a bigger problem than low rpm manners....
 

bikefreak600

Member
Dec 10, 2005
156
2
19
rochelle IL
Oct 26, 2011
#7
  • Oct 26, 2011
  • #7
a 408 + 205 heads needs a vic jr or super vic. why would you spend $2000+ on heads and consider a restrictive intake ? personally i would go with a super vic. the port size will be closer matched. and there will be no worry about lack of low end power with this motor.
big cubes + big heads= power everywhere
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Oct 26, 2011
#8
  • Oct 26, 2011
  • #8
bikefreak600 said:
a 408 + 205 heads needs a vic jr or super vic. why would you spend $2000+ on heads and consider a restrictive intake ? personally i would go with a super vic. the port size will be closer matched. and there will be no worry about lack of low end power with this motor.
big cubes + big heads= power everywhere
Click to expand...

X2, I'm just not seeing it being too big, We have a Super Vic on our 408 with a mild cam, AFR 205's and runs 11.60's@123mph.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Oct 26, 2011
#9
  • Oct 26, 2011
  • #9
I have a Vic Jr on my 349 and its only street driven.
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Oct 27, 2011
#10
  • Oct 27, 2011
  • #10
What is acceptable for street manners is rather subjective. My 408 mach 1 is 90% street driven, with an occasional open track event thrown in. I have a Torker II on my 408 and I added a plenum divider to calm it down and make it more responsive at low rpms. I spend a lot of time in traffic and at stop lights and going through school zones, so I want it to behave as well as my 2006 Toyota truck does from idle on up.

I also just bought a 1/2" 4 hole spacer I'm going to try out in the next few days. There are way too many variables to make a claim that a spacer will or will not work on a given combination as the cam, intake, and intake runner size all come into play. Spacers are cheap; the experiment is worth it regardless of how well it works out IMO.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Oct 27, 2011
#11
  • Oct 27, 2011
  • #11
Understood, the 408 is a street deal, just happen to of taken it to the track. It drives very nice on the street though. I just think a dualplane on a 408 will hurt more than help unless you just want a torquey motor, cause IMO its going to hurt HP.
 

bikefreak600

Member
Dec 10, 2005
156
2
19
rochelle IL
Oct 27, 2011
#12
  • Oct 27, 2011
  • #12
blown65 said:
Understood, the 408 is a street deal, just happen to of taken it to the track. It drives very nice on the street though. I just think a dualplane on a 408 will hurt more than help unless you just want a torquey motor, cause IMO its going to hurt HP.
Click to expand...

exactly ! IMO it will only gain minimal under 4k.ish rpm. deff not worth the loss on the high end. maybe if he spent the money porting a air gap, but i cant imagine a airgap can be ported much? as stated before spacers are cheap AND universal, if it doesnt help it will work on something else, no real loss there.
 

armand67Fstback

Member
Oct 30, 2007
146
1
19
Oct 27, 2011
#13
  • Oct 27, 2011
  • #13
4 hole spacer

69gmachine,

I am curious as to what will happen when you try out the 4-hole spacer on your single plane. Please post some feedback on what you see.

I will talk to the engine builder about port matching the vic jr intake to the heads so that everything is uniform.

This has turned out to be a great discussion, learned a lot.
 

mtaqua

Member
Oct 7, 2006
345
4
19
Oct 27, 2011
#14
  • Oct 27, 2011
  • #14
I have a 4-hole on my chi 3.0 (I think bigger than a super vic). The intake came with a clover leaf, I had it removed and ported. The porting included being matched to an HVH (1"). It kind of makes a transition from the holes in the carb to the intake. Also, it keeps the carb cooler. I don't think a 4-hole will hurt depending on the design.
 

Vinyl66

Member
Mar 21, 2004
398
0
16
Oct 28, 2011
#15
  • Oct 28, 2011
  • #15
Do not swap out a good single plane for a dual plane on that 408. No way! Traction will be your problem NOT low end torque.
I like phenolic spacers if you can fit one. Spacers are sometimes strange in what works and what doesn't. I think a lot has to do with your current tune. But I would use one if it does nothing more than keeping your carb/fuel cooler.
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Nov 2, 2011
#16
  • Nov 2, 2011
  • #16
armand67Fstback said:
69gmachine,

I am curious as to what will happen when you try out the 4-hole spacer on your single plane. Please post some feedback on what you see.
Click to expand...

Well it took a while to get the new spacer on and do a test drive. It did make a noticeable difference, but keep in mind the Torker II is a small runner single plane and I've added a plenum divider separating the left and right banks. You may not notice as significant a difference on a Vic Jr.

I was able to lower the idle speed by about 200 rpm. That uncovered an off idle bog that I had not seen before. I believe I will also need to reduce my main jets as i have a stronger signal to the venturis now. It also pulls smoother at low speeds. I can go all the way down to 10 mph without it bucking, and that was one of the things I was trying to accomplish.

I will try a larger cam on the throttle to see if I can overcome the off idle bog, and drop the main jets two sizes and do another test drive.
 

mtaqua

Member
Oct 7, 2006
345
4
19
Nov 2, 2011
#17
  • Nov 2, 2011
  • #17
maybe bigger squirters
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Nov 5, 2011
#18
  • Nov 5, 2011
  • #18
There's still just the slightest hesitation if I stab the throttle from idle, but I found the major cause of the problem was a vacuum line had come off the nipple at the manifold. I tweaked the front end alignment, and after fixing the vacuum leak, I should be ready to return it to daily driver duty on Monday, woohoo!
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Nov 5, 2011
#19
  • Nov 5, 2011
  • #19
Typically when you add spacers you lean the car out, not make it run rich. Taking jets away is usually the wrong direction when adding spacers. That's of course only if you were correct to begin with. At least with the 4-5 motors I've ran on the dyno with various spacer combos. Never did it need jetting taken out.
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Nov 7, 2011
#20
  • Nov 7, 2011
  • #20
OK, thanks for the tip. I'll hold off on any carb changes until I can get it to a chassis dyno.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
351w na build combo opinions
  • Dan gibson
  • Dec 28, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 28, 2021
Dan gibson
D
M
408 Stroker build (what heads)
  • Mach1969
  • Feb 9, 2020
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
13K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2020
08GT500
A
1987 408 Stroker comperssion
  • AnonymousIguana
  • Oct 2, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 4, 2018
a91what
E
  • Locked
93 347 stroker svoblock lx 5000$
  • escosaint
  • Jul 14, 2011
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jul 14, 2011
escosaint
E
L
  • Locked
94 GT, Boss331, T-56, IRS
  • laserfiveohhh
  • Jun 4, 2011
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
4K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jun 14, 2011
laserfiveohhh
L
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?