• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

408 Vs Aftermarket 302 Block

  • Thread starter Thread starter 5point0stang88
  • Start date Start date Sep 16, 2012

5point0stang88

Active Member
Sep 9, 2011
205
15
29
Sep 16, 2012
#1
  • Sep 16, 2012
  • #1
Which one would be more cost effective? And hold reliable power? I am leaning toward the stroker.
I will write my plan for the car, but in my head is as follows.
Slap my gt40p heads, gt40 intake, tfs1 cam etc on til I order a turbo. (Boost bros) upper and lower control arms etc.
Turbo my gt40p setup 302 to 450rwhp and ride on that while I put together the 408 as basically all new engine with 205 Afr heads etc.
And possibly use same turbo to get the power to 700rwhp.
this car will be my daily on drag radial.
Does this sound like a good plan? I rather know now early cause I think about this every idle second I have in my mind. Thanks for reading
And you may notice, I don't start many threads at all because I research my ass off everyday. Every spare second. Everything has been done before and solved so no need to ask again. I like reading others posts just learning, and I get obsessed with researching.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,050
21,218
234
Box behind Walmart
Sep 16, 2012
#2
  • Sep 16, 2012
  • #2
Good... then you won't mind that I've shut down the thread in the 94/95 Talk section. Multiple threads about the same thing is a pet peeve of mine.

Regardless... Good luck with your project!
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Sep 16, 2012
#3
  • Sep 16, 2012
  • #3
Well for starters, theres nothing inexpensive about an aftermarket block

Sent from my rooted, rommed Galaxy Nexus....
 
Reactions: 95Vert383AOD and 88LX5.Oh

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Sep 16, 2012
#4
  • Sep 16, 2012
  • #4
205's on a 408!!! You can make plenty of power without having to go radical with the cam.
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
Sep 16, 2012
#5
  • Sep 16, 2012
  • #5
If you are going turbo, I would do the aftermarket 302 block. Even with the stronger 351 block, I think 700rwhp is too much. You can easily hit that number with a turbo and a 347, or even 363, if you use an aftermarket block and forged internals.

Joe
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Sep 16, 2012
#6
  • Sep 16, 2012
  • #6
700rwhp gets expensive quick

You can get there either way you want, with that said aftermarket block would be the best way to go.

Stock 351 blocks are indeed stronger but I would not be comfortable pushing one to 700rwhp and expecting longevity.
 

JordanB21

Active Member
Feb 6, 2012
804
27
29
Killeen, Texas
Sep 16, 2012
#7
  • Sep 16, 2012
  • #7
best of both worlds and just do an aftermarket 351 that can support the 700+ hp.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Sep 16, 2012
#8
  • Sep 16, 2012
  • #8
Look at the cost of a aftermarket 8.2 deck block and a 9.5 deck block. Not a big difference... I'd go 9.5 dart block poked and stroked around 427" With a smaller trick flow head and a turbo...
 

5point0stang88

Active Member
Sep 9, 2011
205
15
29
Sep 16, 2012
#9
  • Sep 16, 2012
  • #9
Lol sorry bout the multiple post didn't think you'd catch it

Hmmm true aftermarket block may be too much expense for my DD.
I am thinking the 408 with just 500 or 550 wheel HP should be better.
No power adder. I'm not gonna be tracking it, just cause mayhem around town lol
Oh and will look to shed weight, even if I have to take off the doors, hatch and hood

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
 

JordanB21

Active Member
Feb 6, 2012
804
27
29
Killeen, Texas
Sep 16, 2012
#10
  • Sep 16, 2012
  • #10
If I had the money that's how I would do it. Turbo to me (can't afford them, but if I could....) are toys. N/A has so much more heart.
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Sep 16, 2012
#11
  • Sep 16, 2012
  • #11
JordanB21 said:
If I had the money that's how I would do it. Turbo to me (can't afford them, but if I could....) are toys. N/A has so much more heart.
Click to expand...

:ban2:
 

JordanB21

Active Member
Feb 6, 2012
804
27
29
Killeen, Texas
Sep 16, 2012
#12
  • Sep 16, 2012
  • #12
RacEoHolic330 said:
:ban2:
Click to expand...

Hey now, I was just saying. N/A first. A great build, like a strong foundation. I do like power adders, prefer super over turbo, but I wouldn't bother with a power adder unless I had a built, stroked, block. They're the cherry on top in a sense to me.

Why toss a turbo on a 302(?), you're setting your eyes low. If you're dedicated to a stock 302 block like me, a turbo is a last touch I would bother with when I've ran out of ways to free up and improve horsepower and ETs.

By toys, I don't mean they're useless or pointless or even lesser than a built engine. But there's so much more supporting mods and building that should be worried about before you 'toy' with a turbo/super/Nos. So forth.

For lets say the 2.3 guys, a turbo is all them, Gas effiecent, fast, versatile, best of both worlds. I like it. For a 5.0 and up, build it, then shove air down it's throat like no tomorrow.

.02
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Sep 16, 2012
#13
  • Sep 16, 2012
  • #13
if you consider the fact that youll most likely never come near the horsepower goals youve set (no offense to you, but 99% of people end up with a very badass car on paper that never makes its way to pavement) then an R block or a dart block are both a very large waste of money that could have been put towards a blower or a decent top end.

not to be negative but facts are facts, and i include myself in that 99%
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Sep 16, 2012
#14
  • Sep 16, 2012
  • #14
JordanB21 said:
but I wouldn't bother with a power adder unless I had a built, stroked, block. They're the cherry on top in a sense to me.
Click to expand...
building a balls out N/A motor really puts you the opposite direction youd want to go to build a turbo motor making the same power. They require very different parts in some cases so the idea of building an N/A car to set the world on fire and THEN throwing a turbo on it is just silly to me. Im not saying i disagree, ive grown to love naturally aspirated cars more than anything, but you kind of have to chose early in your build.
 

5point0stang88

Active Member
Sep 9, 2011
205
15
29
Sep 17, 2012
#15
  • Sep 17, 2012
  • #15
Yes true I know it's a different set-up. Really wish I could have my cake and eat it too.
And I hear is easy to get 500+rwhp no problem N/A 408, so I wanna do that.
Yeah, I'd never put out enough power to need aftermarket block, not for a street car, so I made now more realistic goal.

Sent front my SGS3 Epic 4GLTE Touch
 

tannerc91gt

This last 25% is foreign territory at this point
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
4,392
2,967
234
Indiana
Sep 17, 2012
#16
  • Sep 17, 2012
  • #16
5point0stang88 said:
Yes true I know it's a different set-up. Really wish I could have my cake and eat it too.
And I hear is easy to get 500+rwhp no problem N/A 408, so I wanna do that.
Yeah, I'd never put out enough power to need aftermarket block, not for a street car, so I made now more realistic goal.

Sent front my SGS3 Epic 4GLTE Touch
Click to expand...
with the right H/C/I combo 500rwhp isnt all that difficult going either route. its a matter of preference at this point. And everyone on this board has their own
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Sep 17, 2012
#17
  • Sep 17, 2012
  • #17
JordanB21 said:
Hey now, I was just saying. N/A first. A great build, like a strong foundation. I do like power adders, prefer super over turbo, but I wouldn't bother with a power adder unless I had a built, stroked, block. They're the cherry on top in a sense to me.

Why toss a turbo on a 302(?), you're setting your eyes low. If you're dedicated to a stock 302 block like me, a turbo is a last touch I would bother with when I've ran out of ways to free up and improve horsepower and ETs.

By toys, I don't mean they're useless or pointless or even lesser than a built engine. But there's so much more supporting mods and building that should be worried about before you 'toy' with a turbo/super/Nos. So forth.

For lets say the 2.3 guys, a turbo is all them, Gas effiecent, fast, versatile, best of both worlds. I like it. For a 5.0 and up, build it, then shove air down it's throat like no tomorrow.

.02
Click to expand...

I'm just giving you a hard time. Usually people that build big block setups are going in a very different direction than those that build turbocharged small blocks. Each has their place.
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Sep 17, 2012
#18
  • Sep 17, 2012
  • #18
tannerc91gt said:
building a balls out N/A motor really puts you the opposite direction youd want to go to build a turbo motor making the same power. They require very different parts in some cases so the idea of building an N/A car to set the world on fire and THEN throwing a turbo on it is just silly to me. Im not saying i disagree, ive grown to love naturally aspirated cars more than anything, but you kind of have to chose early in your build.
Click to expand...

only difference between a bad ass NA motor and a bad ass turbo motor is the cam and pistons.

only difference between a bad ass NA motor and a bad ass blower motor is the cam and pistons

only difference between a bad ass NA motor and a bad ass nitrous motor is... NOTHING
 

S&B

I hate my CT. :(
10 Year Member
Dec 18, 2005
1,634
695
204
Cheesehead
Sep 17, 2012
#19
  • Sep 17, 2012
  • #19
your going to need
Fuel system
Transmission setup
new rear unless thats done already
some way to manage the engine (efi or Carb)
Some way to the cool the engine
Some way to control spark

Then you can choose what motor you want to go with. Since you going for such big power everything needs to be upgraded, iv'e done it before I know. The turbo is cool if you want people to be impressed with you. The 408 is nice if you actually want to use the car.

used your looking 6-8k new your looking 10k and up
 

JordanB21

Active Member
Feb 6, 2012
804
27
29
Killeen, Texas
Sep 17, 2012
#20
  • Sep 17, 2012
  • #20
RacEoHolic330 said:
I'm just giving you a hard time. Usually people that build big block setups are going in a very different direction than those that build turbocharged small blocks. Each has their place.
Click to expand...
I wasn't sure if it was like 'screw this idiot' or 'lol lemme toss some faces his way' so I was like. OPINIONs everywhere.

But hey, my final answer. still aftermarket stroked 351w!

Went back and read that it'll be DD too, I change my response, non-aftermarket 351w will do it. If you want 500+ on a 302 block you'll crack it soon enough. Go the safer route that supports the power and gets to the power easier.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
624
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
303
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
851
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Progress Thread Evolution of the 'Hudson Heap' plans (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Jan 5, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 26, 2024
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?