429 Help to 1967 mustang!!!!!!!!!

lookout4me

Banned
Apr 3, 2005
35
0
0
I was wondering if i could easly put a 429ci engine from a 1969 thunderbird
into a 1967 coupe.
if not could you plz tell me what engines would fit directly in or some modifications that might be needed i want a differnt engine.
 
no i was wondering how hard is it to just put it in and get it to work or if it can fit into the engine bay.
and i was just wondering how it could be done because i have a to chose a new engine and i wanted a big 429 or maybe a small 351w the stock engine was a 302.
 
Well since no mustang prior to 1971 came with a 385 series 429 it's not easy to put one in those cars. Hence the link to mpgheads.com because they provide the components necessary to make it happen. Sure you can make mounts yourself but it's not easy trying to fab up mounts while that monster is on the hook. I don't think the average weekend wrench could build an exhaust to fit within the confines of the early shock towers. If you want easy then go with a windsor pick your size and drop it in.
 
Great link Rhyno9. It's certainly not cheap. I would also ask if you could change spark plugs without unbolting the engine.
Personally, I would go with a stroked 351W for almost the same displacement, less weight and therefore better handling.
 
THe 429 will drop right in . I did the same thing in the 80's to a 67 coupe. 429 out of a 69 tbird. Had to use the stock exhaust manifolds and a c6.

The car ran like a raped ape. the hood closed and NOOOBODY had any idea what was sitting next to them at the lights.

Ford Power Parts in Norwalk Ca. made the engine brackets and I used a very flat flex fan for the narrow gap between the nose of the WP and the radiator.

Now for the downside. The 429 has gobbs of low end torque and the car will feel phenomenal, however, you can get more power, better performance out of a nicely worked small block w/ FI today and not be saddled with such a heavy motor and bad gas mileage.

Shock towers are not in the way for this (or a 460) swap. The engine is tall and skinny.

BTW - I uesd to always race this same idiot on rooselvelt blvd with a brand new (at the time) 86 Grand National. The 2 cars were about dead even which used to frustrate the hell out of him, since my mustang looked like such a POS.

jer
 
PS - I have not been able to find the post, but someone on one of the other forums ran a 69 429 on a chassis dyno in a 67 mustang and it had 237 rear wheel hp. (FWIW)
 
I have two 429/460 Stangs and love the big blocks. Yes it's easy to do. Yes it runs great. Yes you can easily do maintenance and yes, I'd do it again. Small blocks look puny to me. My current blown 460 has over 800 HP for my 67. Stock 429's came with 370 or so HP, so I have no idea how someone could have 200 HP unless it was running on 5 cylinders.